IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7511-d589040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Proposal for Recognition Systems in Sustainable Freight Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Rodrigues de Freitas

    (Production Engineering Program, Federal Center of Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro 999074, Brazil
    Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 999074, Brazil)

  • Márcio de Almeida D’Agosto

    (Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 999074, Brazil)

  • Lino Guimarães Marujo

    (Production Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 999074, Brazil)

Abstract

Establishing a recognition system for sustainable freight transport is a process of change that requires the commitment of those involved and application of good practices. The pressures from consumers and competitors do not allow greater engagement with economic, social, and environmental aspects, and the maintenance stages require a long-term effort to obtain credibility, because the participation of external members of society in the evaluation contributes to reduce the influences and uncertainties of the recognition criterion. In light of the difficulties of establishing a green supply chain, we propose a method with multiple approaches with an emphasis on fuzzy logic. The purpose is to reduce the indecision of judgment, to debug the qualitative variables and to reduce interference from competitors. The procedure was applied to six companies that have carbon reduction programs, but we found that firms with a core business in transport had greater success in the transition to low carbon operations than contractors or shippers. The certification levels allowed visual contact between consumers and the company, making it possible to monitor sustainability actions in freight transportation operations and the competitiveness to achieve higher labeling levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Rodrigues de Freitas & Márcio de Almeida D’Agosto & Lino Guimarães Marujo, 2021. "Methodological Proposal for Recognition Systems in Sustainable Freight Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7511-:d:589040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roine Leiringer, 2020. "Sustainable Construction through Industry Self-Regulation: The Development and Role of Building Environmental Assessment Methods in Achieving Green Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Rocio de la Torre & Canan G. Corlu & Javier Faulin & Bhakti S. Onggo & Angel A. Juan, 2021. "Simulation, Optimization, and Machine Learning in Sustainable Transportation Systems: Models and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Finlay MacGregor & Vasna Ramasar & Kimberly A. Nicholas, 2017. "Problems with Firm-Led Voluntary Sustainability Schemes: The Case of Direct Trade Coffee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Wagner, Stefan & Ries, Andreas & Berbner, Ulrich & Witte, Henning, 2014. "4th Party Logistics – Chancen und Herausforderungen. Neue Wege im Logistikmanagement," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 70591, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Kerry Griffiths & Carol Boyle & Theunis F. P. Henning, 2018. "Beyond the Certification Badge—How Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tools Impact on Individual, Organizational, and Industry Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Chaher Alzaman, 2014. "Green supply chain modelling: literature review," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 16-39.
    7. Saman Hassanzadeh Amin & Guoqing Zhang, 2014. "Closed-loop supply chain network configuration by a multi-objective mathematical model," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15.
    8. Nishitani, Kimitaka, 2009. "An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 669-679, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Rodrigues de Freitas & Joyce Azevedo Caetano & Cintia Machado de Oliveira & Felipe do Carmo Amorim & Marcio Antelio Neves da Silva, 2022. "Transport Sustainability Index: An Application Multicriteria Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luay Jum’a & Dominik Zimon & Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "A Relationship between Supply Chain Practices, Environmental Sustainability and Financial Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Blackman, Allen & Guerrero, Santiago, 2012. "What drives voluntary eco-certification in Mexico?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 256-268.
    4. Arimura, Toshi H. & Darnall, Nicole & Katayama, Hajime, 2011. "Is ISO 14001 a gateway to more advanced voluntary action? The case of green supply chain management," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 170-182, March.
    5. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Muhammad Asif, 2020. "Role of Energy Conservation and Management in the 4D Sustainable Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-3, November.
    7. Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2009. "Performance environnementale et économique de l'entreprise," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 71-94.
    8. George Halkos & Stylianos Nomikos & Antonis Skouloudis, 2021. "Revisiting ISO 14001 diffusion among national terrains: panel data evidence from OECD countries and the BRIICS," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-803, October.
    9. Katherine Fuller & Carola Grebitus, 2023. "Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for coffee sustainability labels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1007-1025, October.
    10. Serdal Ozusaglam & Stéphane Robin & Chee Yew Wong, 2018. "Early and late adopters of ISO 14001-type standards: revisiting the role of firm characteristics and capabilities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1318-1345, October.
    11. Nishitani, Kimitaka, 2010. "Demand for ISO 14001 adoption in the global supply chain: An empirical analysis focusing on environmentally conscious markets," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 395-407, August.
    12. Rocio Carillo Labella & Manuel Parras Rosa & Fatiha Fort & Eva María Murgado Armenteros, 2017. "Certification of Quality as a Forerunner of Environmental Sustainability Standards Adoption in the Olive Oil Production Industry," Post-Print hal-01623961, HAL.
    13. Martínez, Cecilia & Skeet, Ann Gregg & Sasia, Pedro M., 2021. "Managing organizational ethics: How ethics becomes pervasive within organizations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 83-92.
    14. Emiko Inoue, 2015. "An empirical analysis on the relationship between emissions trading system and R&D investment," Discussion papers e-15-008, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    15. Gustavo Lannelongue & Oscar Gonzalez-Benito & Javier Gonzalez-Benito, 2014. "Environmental Motivations: The Pathway to Complete Environmental Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 135-147, September.
    16. Bang-Ning Hwang & Chi-Yo Huang & Chih-Hsiung Wu, 2016. "A TOE Approach to Establish a Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    17. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    18. Richey, Lisa Ann & Ponte, Stefano, 2021. "Brand Aid and coffee value chain development interventions: Is Starbucks working aid out of business?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Kimitaka Nishitani & M.B. Haider & Katsuhiko Kokubu, 2014. "Corporate Environmental Initiatives and Shareholder Value: Focusing on the Role of Environmental Information and Its Credibility," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-13, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    20. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7511-:d:589040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.