IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p37-d466669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Conceptual Model for Assessing Quality, Production and Satisfaction (SQual4Agri), in Agricultural Production Units, in Cape Verde

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Simões

    (School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Cape Verde, 7600 Praia, Cape Verde)

  • Margarida Saraiva

    (Department of Management, School of Social Sciences, University of Évora, 7000-803 Évora, Portugal
    BRU—Business Research Unit/ISCTE, University Institute of Lisbon, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Gottlieb Basch

    (Crop Science Department of the School of Science and Technology, University of Évora & Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development (MED), 7002-554 Évora, Portugal)

  • António Ramos Pires

    (Research Unit of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, New University of Lisbon, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Álvaro Rosa

    (ISCTE—Business School, University Institute of Lisbon, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Elisa Chaleta

    (Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Évora & CIEP—Center for Research in Education and Psychology, 7000-803 Évora, Portugal)

Abstract

In Cape Verde, small family farming production suffers continuously from limited essential resources such as water and soil for a steady development. This situation is further aggravated by the lack of financial resources. We have developed a hybrid and multidimensional conceptual model for improvement of those small farming units by bringing together concepts of quality management, farmers’ satisfaction evaluation and production capabilities. The model we have built was the result of an inquiry based on Focus Group study with 15 farmers and it was carried out in 2019. We name the model as SQual4Agri and this is a step toward improvement in small family based agricultural organization, namely in productivity, responsibility sharing, communication and quality management.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Simões & Margarida Saraiva & Gottlieb Basch & António Ramos Pires & Álvaro Rosa & Elisa Chaleta, 2020. "Hybrid Conceptual Model for Assessing Quality, Production and Satisfaction (SQual4Agri), in Agricultural Production Units, in Cape Verde," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:37-:d:466669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaime Torres Fragoso & Ignacio Luna Espinoza, 2017. "Assessment of banking service quality perception using the SERVPERF model," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(4), pages 1294-1316, Octubre-D.
    2. Lowder, Sarah K. & Skoet, Jakob & Singh, Saumya, 2014. "What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world? Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2014," ESA Working Papers 288983, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Zhang & Ruifa Hu, 2020. "Does Fertilizer Use Intensity Respond to the Urban-Rural Income Gap? Evidence from a Dynamic Panel-Data Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Ilaria Fusacchia & Jean Balié & Luca Salvatici, 2022. "The AfCFTA impact on agricultural and food trade: a value added perspective," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 237-284.
    3. Jamie Anderson & Wajiha Ahmed, 2015. "Early Insights from Financial Diaries of Smallholder Households," World Bank Publications - Reports 23498, The World Bank Group.
    4. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Kryszak, Łukasz, 2017. "Wpływ typów rolnictwa na emisję gazów cieplarnianych," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 1(174).
    5. Giller, Ken E. & Andersson, Jens & Delaune, Thomas & Silva, João Vasco & Descheemaeker, Katrien & van de Ven, Gerrie & Schut, Antonius G.T. & van Wijk, Mark & Hammond, Jim & Hochman, Zvi & Taulya, God, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 83: The future of farming: who will produce our food?," IFAD Research Series 322005, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    6. Larson,Donald F. & Muraoka,Rie & Otsuka,Keijiro, 2016. "On the central role of small farms in African rural development strategies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7710, The World Bank.
    7. Rie Muraoka & Tomoya Matsumoto & Songqing Jin & Keijiro Otsuka, 2016. "On the Possibility of a Maize Green Revolution in the Highlands of Kenya: An Assessment of Emerging Intensive Farming Systems," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Keijiro Otsuka & Donald F. Larson (ed.), In Pursuit of an African Green Revolution, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 145-164, Springer.
    8. Arlindo Rodrigues Fortes & Vladmir Ferreira & Elsa Barbosa Simões & Isaurinda Baptista & Stefano Grando & Erik Sequeira, 2020. "Food Systems and Food Security: The Role of Small Farms and Small Food Businesses in Santiago Island, Cabo Verde," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    9. Karen Kaijuan Xu & Kenny Kuanchou Chen & Euisoo Kim & Jerónimo García-Fernández & John Nauright & James J. Zhang, 2021. "Dimensions of Service Quality in Health-Fitness Clubs in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher, 2015. "Small Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic Development," Discussion Papers 210464, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    11. Nhung Pham Thi & Martin Kappas & Heiko Faust, 2021. "Impacts of Agricultural Land Acquisition for Urbanization on Agricultural Activities of Affected Households: A Case Study in Huong Thuy Town, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Marioara RUSU & Violeta FLORIAN & Elisabeta ROȘU, 2020. "Marketing The Production Of Family Farms Within Limits Imposed By The Covid-19 Pandemic," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 125-134.
    13. Hanumantha Rao Sama & Long-Sheng Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Madhavaiah Chendragiri, 2023. "Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 479-501, June.
    14. Ray Bush, 2016. "Family farming in the Near East and North Africa," Working Papers 151, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    15. Drygas, Mirosław, 2015. "Kryteria Definiowania Gospodarstw Rodzinnych W Wybranych Krajach," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 1(166.1).
    16. Joseph Kangmennaang & Rachel Bezner Kerr & Esther Lupafya & Laifolo Dakishoni & Mangani Katundu & Isaac Luginaah, 2017. "Impact of a participatory agroecological development project on household wealth and food security in Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 561-576, June.
    17. Yonela Mndela & Naledzani Ndou & Adolph Nyamugama, 2023. "Irrigation Scheduling for Small-Scale Crops Based on Crop Water Content Patterns Derived from UAV Multispectral Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Elisabeth Simelton & Tuan Minh Duong & Ella Houzer, 2021. "When the “Strong Arms” Leave the Farms—Migration, Gender Roles and Risk Reduction in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    19. Rigg, Jonathan & Salamanca, Albert & Phongsiri, Monchai & Sripun, Mattara, 2018. "More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 327-337.
    20. Seth D. Baum & David C. Denkenberger & Joshua M. Pearce & Alan Robock & Richelle Winkler, 2015. "Resilience to global food supply catastrophes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 301-313, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:37-:d:466669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.