IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2707-d338851.html

When a Girl Awakened the World: A User and Social Message Analysis of Greta Thunberg

Author

Listed:
  • Jieun Jung

    (Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

  • Peter Petkanic

    (Department of Big Data Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Dongyan Nan

    (Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

  • Jang Hyun Kim

    (Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

Abstract

Young climate activist Greta Thunberg was Time magazine’s Person of the Year for 2019. In this study, the authors examine the role of social media in Thunberg’s rise to prominence by investigating Twitter communications over 14 months, analyzing tweet contents and user profiles. The changes in sentiment revealed on Twitter are examined, along with four major events from the period. The paper also compares Swedish and American user characteristics in relation to Thunberg. The findings reveal that celebrities and public figures played an essential role in amplifying the influence of the activist. To categorize the influencer group, the authors identified each user’s occupation, organization, location and position on other social issues. The results show that some people held a negative attitude toward Thunberg, not only because of their skepticism about climate change but also because of their views on other social issues, such as gender and age.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieun Jung & Peter Petkanic & Dongyan Nan & Jang Hyun Kim, 2020. "When a Girl Awakened the World: A User and Social Message Analysis of Greta Thunberg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2707-:d:338851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Druckman, James N. & Peterson, Erik & Slothuus, Rune, 2013. "How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 57-79, February.
    2. Clare Llewellyn & Laura Cram & Robin L. Hill & Adrian Favero, 2019. "For Whom the Bell Trolls: Shifting Troll Behaviour in the Twitter Brexit Debate," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 1148-1164, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crispino, Marta & Loberto, Michele, 2024. "Do people pay attention to climate change? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 434-449.
    2. Su, Chi-Wei & Li, Wenhao & Umar, Muhammad & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Can green credit reduce the emissions of pollutants?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 205-219.
    3. Bulmer, Sandy & Palakshappa, Nitha & Dodds, Sarah & Harper, Sarah, 2024. "Sustainability, brand authenticity and Instagram messaging," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Hettinga, Sanne & Boter, Jaap & Dias, Eduardo & Fruijtier, Steven & de Vogel, Brian & Scholten, Henk, 2021. "Urban energy transition in a gaming context: The role of children," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellani, Luna & Berriochoa, Kattalina & Kapteina, Mark & Schwerdt, Guido, 2024. "Information Provision and Support for Inheritance Taxation: Evidence from a Representative Survey Experiment in Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 17099, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Leonie Geyer & Patrick Mellacher, 2024. "Simulating Party Competition in Dynamic Voter Distributions," Graz Economics Papers 2024-19, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    3. Joel Lansing Reed, 2026. "Utility and Democracy in Political Campaign Advertising: Toward a Rule-Utilitarian Ethic for Political Marketing and the Ethics of Meddling in the Other Party’s Primary," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 611-630, January.
    4. Cohle, Zachary & Ortega, Alberto, 2022. "Life of the party: The polarizing effect of foreign direct investment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Wanyun Shao & Feng Hao, 2020. "Approval of political leaders can slant evaluation of political issues: evidence from public concern for climate change in the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 201-212, January.
    6. Elizabeth Suhay & James N. Druckman, 2015. "The Politics of Science," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 6-15, March.
    7. Barron, Kai & Becker, Anna & Huck, Steffen, 2025. "Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Andrea Junqueira & Ali Kagalwala & Christine S. Lipsmeyer, 2023. "What's your problem? How issue ownership and partisan discourse influence personal concerns," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(1), pages 25-37, January.
    9. Hengda Jin & Kenneth Merkley & Anish Sharma & Karen Ton, 2025. "Customers’ response to firms’ disclosure of social stances: evidence from voting reform laws," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 202-246, March.
    10. Ben M. Tappin & Adam J. Berinsky & David G. Rand, 2023. "Partisans’ receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 568-582, April.
    11. Kendrick B. Roberson, 2024. "Insidious racism and institutional constraints: evidence from national and local case studies in the United States," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Steven Jokinsky & Christine S. Lipsmeyer & Andrew Q. Philips & Laron K. Williams & Guy D. Whitten, 2024. "Look over there. Where? A compositional approach to the modeling of public opinion on the most important problem," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 913-933, July.
    13. Federico Vegetti, 2019. "The Political Nature of Ideological Polarization: The Case of Hungary," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 78-96, January.
    14. Victor Y. Wu, 2025. "Messages from co-partisan elected officials can increase climate mitigation intentions without changing climate beliefs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Natalia Garbiras-Díaz & Miguel García-Sánchez & Aila M Matanock, 2024. "Political elite cues and attitude formation in post-conflict contexts," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(5), pages 874-890, September.
    16. Fine, Adam D. & Rowan, Zachary & Simmons, Cortney, 2019. "Do politics Trump race in determining America's youths' perceptions of law enforcement?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 48-57.
    17. Asmus Leth Olsen & Anders Woller, 2023. "Citizens’ economic recovery models for a pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Dieter Dekeyser & Henk Roose, 2022. "Polarizing policy opinions with conflict framed information: activating negative views of political parties in a multi-party system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1121-1138, June.
    19. Hilary Boudet & Chad Zanocco & Greg Stelmach & Mahmood Muttaqee & June Flora, 2021. "Public preferences for five electricity grid decarbonization policies in California," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(5), pages 510-528, September.
    20. Marten Risius & Kevin Marc Blasiak, 2024. "Shadowbanning," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(6), pages 817-829, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2707-:d:338851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.