IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2672-d338291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Difference of User Satisfaction and Net Benefit of a Mobile Learning Management System According to Self-Directed Learning: An Investigation of Cyber University Students in Hospitality

Author

Listed:
  • Eun-Yong Lee

    (Department of Hotel Restaurant Management, Kyung Hee Cyber University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Yu Jung Jennifer Jeon

    (Department of Hotel and Tourism Management, Far East University, 76-32 Daehak-gil, Gamgok-myeon, Eumseong-gun, Chungbuk 27601, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the features affecting user satisfaction and net benefits of a mobile learning management system (LMS) for cyber university students working in the hospitality industry using the quality factors from the updated DeLone and McLean information system success model. Also, the study focuses on finding whether there is a difference in the perception of the cyber university’s mobile LMS depending on self-directed learning (SDL). A series of theory-based hypotheses were examined through structural equation modelling using empirical data collected from a sample of 328 students in cyber universities in Korea. The results indicate that information quality, system quality, and service quality have a positive effect on user satisfaction, and the subsequent user satisfaction has a positive effect on net benefits. The multi-group analysis revealed that all the paths were significant for high SDL groups, whereas for low SDL groups, a path between information quality and user satisfaction was not statistically supported. These results suggest that a differentiated strategy based on SDL level is needed to improve user satisfaction and the net benefit of the mobile LMS. The results are expected to provide implications for the stable operation of mobile LMSs for cyber universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun-Yong Lee & Yu Jung Jennifer Jeon, 2020. "The Difference of User Satisfaction and Net Benefit of a Mobile Learning Management System According to Self-Directed Learning: An Investigation of Cyber University Students in Hospitality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2672-:d:338291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajay Purohit & Gaurav Chopra & Parshuram G. Dangwal, 2022. "Measuring the Effectiveness of the Project Management Information System (PMIS) on the Financial Wellness of Rural Households in the Hill Districts of Uttarakhand, India: An IS-FW Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Waleed A. Hammood & Ruzaini Abdullah Arshah & Salwana Mohamad Asmara & Hussam Al Halbusi & Omar A. Hammood & Salem Al Abri, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Flood Early Warning and Response System (FEWRS): A Deep Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Keol Lim & Yeong Ok Nam & Sanghyeon Eom & Yoonho Jang & Donjeong Kim & Mi Hwa Kim, 2020. "Structural Gender Differences in LMS Use Patterns among College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Abdullah F. Alnaim & Nadia Abdelhamid Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed, 2023. "Examining the Impact of Marketing Motives and Concerns on User Satisfaction and Re-Purchase Intentions in a Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan & Nour Awni Albelbisi & Omar Hujran & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Ali Alkhalifah, 2021. "Developing a Holistic Success Model for Sustainable E-Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Dodik Ariyanto & Ayu Aryista Dewi & Henny Triyana Hasibuan & Rizky Bagus Paramadani, 2022. "The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Mohammed Abdo Albaom & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rusli Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Nur Anita Yunikawati & Magistyo Purboyo Priambodo & Mohammed Saleh Nusari & Dhakir Abbas Ali, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Personal Innovativeness in Tourists’ Intention to Use Web 3.0 Based on Updated Information Systems Success Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    3. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    4. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    5. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    6. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    7. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    8. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    9. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    10. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    11. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    12. Landrum, Hollis & Prybutok, Victor R., 2004. "A service quality and success model for the information service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 628-642, August.
    13. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou & Willem-Paul Brinkman & Banita Lal, 2010. "Examining the influence of service quality and secondary influence on the behavioural intention to change internet service provider," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 207-217, April.
    14. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    15. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.
    18. Mohammad Fakhrulnizam Mohammad & Rusli Abdullah & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan & Nor Aida Abdul Rahman, 2018. "Towards The Integration Of Quality Management System And Knowledge Management System In Higher Education Institution: Development Of Q-Edge Kms Model," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 4-9, February.
    19. Sameera Butt & Asif Mahmood & Saima Saleem & Shah Ali Murtaza & Sana Hassan & Edina Molnár, 2023. "The Contribution of Learner Characteristics and Perceived Learning to Students’ Satisfaction and Academic Performance during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2672-:d:338291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.