IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1870-d327232.html

Rethinking the Box for Sustainable Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús García-Arca

    (Grupo de Ingeniería de Organización (GIO), Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • José A. Comesaña-Benavides

    (Grupo de Ingeniería de Organización (GIO), Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • A. Trinidad González-Portela Garrido

    (Grupo de Ingeniería de Organización (GIO), Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • J. Carlos Prado-Prado

    (Grupo de Ingeniería de Organización (GIO), Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

Abstract

Packaging design is one of the potential strategies for increasing logistics performance, not only from a cost reduction perspective, but also from a sustainable point of view. The deployment of a sustainable vision in packaging design should demand a holistic view of packaging, supply chain and product; this integrated vision is the main point of the “Sustainable Packaging Logistics” (SPL) approach. At a logistics level, a key link with the different stages of the supply chain is the secondary packaging, which most commonly takes the form of a corrugated cardboard box. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to develop a systematic and dynamic method that makes it possible to connect design decisions about the dimensions of that box with their impact on overall efficiency and sustainability of the supply chain. In order to develop this model, the impact on three different logistics systems is described. Those systems are palletizing, multimodal containers and parcel services. Likewise, in addition to proposing the theoretical model, the authors have tested it successfully in three different companies (with the three logistics systems mentioned) following the “action research” approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús García-Arca & José A. Comesaña-Benavides & A. Trinidad González-Portela Garrido & J. Carlos Prado-Prado, 2020. "Rethinking the Box for Sustainable Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1870-:d:327232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1870/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1870/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingfeng Zhang & Sichao Liu & Yang Liu & Rui Li, 2016. "Smart box-enabled product–service system for cloud logistics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(22), pages 6693-6706, November.
    2. Maurizio Faccio & Mauro Gamberi & Francesco Pilati & Marco Bortolini, 2015. "Packaging strategy definition for sales kits within an assembly system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 3288-3305, June.
    3. Accorsi, Riccardo & Cascini, Alessandro & Cholette, Susan & Manzini, Riccardo & Mora, Cristina, 2014. "Economic and environmental assessment of reusable plastic containers: A food catering supply chain case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 88-101.
    4. Jesús García-Arca & A. Trinidad González-Portela Garrido & J. Carlos Prado-Prado, 2017. "“Sustainable Packaging Logistics”. The link between Sustainability and Competitiveness in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Morabito, Reinaldo & Morales, Silvia Regina & Widmer, João Alexandre, 2000. "Loading optimization of palletized products on trucks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 285-296, December.
    6. Bjorn De Koeijer & Jos De Lange & Renee Wever, 2017. "Desired, Perceived, and Achieved Sustainability: Trade-Offs in Strategic and Operational Packaging Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan-Ting Li & Yueh-Hsiu Cheng, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Development of the Destination with Tea Public Version Packaging Design by Obtaining Relational Space Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Xinyang Xu & Yang Yang, 2022. "Analysis of the Dilemma of Promoting Circular Logistics Packaging in China: A Stochastic Evolutionary Game-Based Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesus Garcia-Arca & Jose A. Comesaña-Benavides & A. Trinidad Gonzalez-Portela Garrido & J. Carlos Prado-Prado, 2021. "Methodology for selecting packaging alternatives: an “action research” application in the industrial sector," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1427-1446, December.
    2. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Maaike Mulder-Nijkamp & Bjorn De Koeijer & Robbert-Jan Torn, 2018. "Synthesizing Sustainability Considerations through Educational Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-37, December.
    4. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Sarah Verdonk & Keri Chiveralls & Drew Dawson, 2017. "Getting Wasted at WOMADelaide: The Effect of Signage on Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Cochran, Jeffery K. & Ramanujam, Balaji, 2006. "Carrier-mode logistics optimization of inbound supply chains for electronics manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 826-840, October.
    8. Camilla Tua & Laura Biganzoli & Mario Grosso & Lucia Rigamonti, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Novas, Juan M. & Ramello, Juan Ignacio & Rodríguez, María Analía, 2020. "Generalized disjunctive programming models for the truck loading problem: A case study from the non-alcoholic beverages industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Xinyang Xu & Yang Yang, 2022. "Analysis of the Dilemma of Promoting Circular Logistics Packaging in China: A Stochastic Evolutionary Game-Based Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Lins, Lauro & Lins, Sostenes & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2002. "An n-tet graph approach for non-guillotine packings of n-dimensional boxes into an n-container," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 421-439, September.
    14. Riccardo Accorsi & Lorenzo Versari & Riccardo Manzini, 2015. "Glass vs. Plastic: Life Cycle Assessment of Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Bottles across Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, March.
    15. E G Birgin & R D Lobato & R Morabito, 2010. "An effective recursive partitioning approach for the packing of identical rectangles in a rectangle," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(2), pages 306-320, February.
    16. Daniel Friedrich, 2024. "Success factors for effective plastic avoidance in tourism: a German consumer study with focus on beach holidays," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 563-574, September.
    17. Li, Huimin & Zhao, Jing & Cao, Yongchao & Su, Limin & Zhao, Zhichao & Zhang, Yafei, 2024. "Servitization and product service system: A literature review on value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Hong Sun, 2024. "Inventory control for reusable express packaging with under sharing policy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3677-3689, September.
    19. Izabella Almirante Porto Tiburcio Rodrigues & Roberta Vianna Alves & Maria José de Oliveira Cavalcanti Guimarães & Thiago Santiago Gomes & Elen Beatriz Acordi Vasques Pacheco, 2022. "Assessment of plastic lumber production in Brazil as a substitute for natural wood," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9705-9730, August.
    20. Hussein, Jelili Babatunde & Workneh, Tilahun Seyoum & Kassim, Alaika & Ntsowe, Khuthadzo & Melesse, Sileshi F. & El-Mesery, Hany S. & Zicheng, Hu, 2025. "A review of the use of artificial intelligence in renewable energy for food processing and preservation process optimisation, challenges, and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1870-:d:327232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.