IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1482-d321440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Railway Network Performance in Countries of the TEN-T Orient–East Med Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Svetla Stoilova

    (Faculty of Transport, Technical University of Sofia, 8 Kl. Ohridski Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Nolberto Munier

    (Institute for the Management and Innovation of Knowledge (INGENIO), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camí de Vera, s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Martin Kendra

    (Department of Railway Transport, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Tomáš Skrúcaný

    (Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Railway networks have different levels of development, which affects the overall transport process and integrated sustainable development. This paper presents a methodology to assess and classify the railway network performance along the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) core network corridor. The Orient–East Med corridor (OEM) has been examined. Twenty-two infrastructural, economic and technological criteria for assessment of railway transport have been proposed. The countries were ranked used multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), by applying the Sequential Interactive Modelling for Urban Systems (SIMUS). A sensitivity analysis was performed regarding each objective, and then, their allowable range of variation was determined without modifying the whole ranking of countries. The criteria weights have been determined on the basis of the output of using the SIMUS method. It was found that the main criteria for ranking the countries are: length of the connecting railway lines of the corridor in the country, length of the railway lines in the country, number of intermodal terminals, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, passengers transport performance, freight transport performance for the railway network, corridor freight usage intensity. It was found that the railway transport in the area of the OEM corridor located in Central Europe is better developed than in the Southeast European area. A cluster analysis was performed to classify countries into groups to verify the results. The results show that the eight countries included in the OEM corridor can be classified into three groups. The methodology could be used to make decisions about transport planning and improvement of the connectivity and sustainability of the railway transport, considering their development.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetla Stoilova & Nolberto Munier & Martin Kendra & Tomáš Skrúcaný, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Railway Network Performance in Countries of the TEN-T Orient–East Med Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1482-:d:321440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nolberto Munier & Eloy Hontoria & Fernando Jiménez-Sáez, 2019. "Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-030-02726-1, September.
    2. Jourquin, Bart & Beuthe, Michel, 2019. "Cost, transit time and speed elasticity calculations for the European continental freight transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Saeedi, Hamid & Wiegmans, Bart & Behdani, Behzad & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2017. "European intermodal freight transport network: Market structure analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 141-154.
    4. Jourquin, Bart & Beuthe, Michel, 2019. "Cost, transit time and speed elasticity calculations for the European continental freight transport," LIDAM Reprints CORE 3085, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Maria Öberg & Kristina L. Nilsson & Charlotta M. Johansson, 2018. "Expected benefits and drawbacks of Baltic Sea European transport corridors—Implications for complementary governance of TEN-T Core network corridors," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1423870-142, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esther Jose & Puneet Agarwal & Jun Zhuang & Jose Swaminathan, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1133-1168, June.
    2. Eva Brumercikova & Adrian Sperka, 2020. "Problems of Access to Services at Railway Stations in Freight Transport in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Eloy Hontoria & Alejandro López-Belchí & Nolberto Munier & Francisco Vera-García, 2021. "A MCDM Methodology to Determine the Most Critical Variables in the Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Minichannels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Marzena Kramarz & Katarzyna Dohn & Edyta Przybylska & Lilla Knop, 2020. "Scenarios for the Development of Multimodal Transport in the TRITIA Cross-Border Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Sandra Lourenço Amaro & Sofia Barbosa & Gloria Ammerer & Aina Bruno & Jordi Guimerà & Ioannis Orfanoudakis & Anna Ostręga & Evangelia Mylona & Jessica Strydom & Michael Hitch, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating Transitional and Post-Mining Options—An Innovative Perspective from the EIT ReviRIS Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Elzbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Ogrodnik, 2021. "A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Vladimir Simić & Radovan Soušek & Stefan Jovčić, 2020. "Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Michal Drábek & Vít Janoš, 2021. "Construction of Differentiated Periodic Freight Train Paths in Dense Mixed Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    9. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    10. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Qiu, Yanjun & Stević, Željko & Simić, Vladimir, 2023. "Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Hailin & Lv, Haibin & Lv, Zhihan, 2023. "Resilience towarded Digital Twins to improve the adaptability of transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Niérat, Patrick, 2022. "Methodological shortcuts in intermodal freight transport: Critical review and proposals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Čarný Štefan & Zitrický Vladislav & Šipuš Denis, 2020. "Harmonization of Transport Charging in Slovak Republic," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Vitalii Naumov & Gaziza Zhumatayeva & Igor Taran & Madina Bazarbekova & Batyrbek Kenzhegaliyev, 2022. "Selecting a Rational Scheme of Delivery by Road Transport: A Case Study of Goods Deliveries from China to Russia through Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Pier Paolo Miglietta, 2023. "A Novel Axial-Distance-Based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) Method for the Evaluation of Agri-Food Circular-Economy-Based Business Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    7. Jiří KOLÁŘ & Ondrej STOPKA & Srećko KRILE, 2018. "Specification Of A Location For Opted Port Logistics Center In A Given Area Using The Method Of Operational Research," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(4), pages 56-63, December.
    8. Tadić, Snežana & Krstić, Mladen & Brnjac, Nikolina, 2019. "Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 170-180.
    9. Mohammed Al Awadh, 2022. "Utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Evaluate the Quality of Healthcare Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2022. "The Complexity of Logistics Services at Transshipment Terminals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Hamid Saeedi & Bart Wiegmans & Behzad Behdani, 2021. "Measuring concentration in transhipment markets: methodologies and application to a European case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 548-568, September.
    12. Sunil Tiwari & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Justyna Żywiołek, 2022. "Internet of Things as a Sustainable Energy Management Solution at Tourism Destinations in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Svetla Stoilova & Nolberto Munier, 2021. "Analysis of Policies of Railway Operators Using SWOT Criteria and the SIMUS Method: A Case for the Bulgarian Railway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Yevang Nhiavue & Han Soo Lee & Sylvester William Chisale & Jonathan Salar Cabrera, 2022. "Prioritization of Renewable Energy for Sustainable Electricity Generation and an Assessment of Floating Photovoltaic Potential in Lao PDR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Jorge Iván Pérez Rave & Gloria Patricia Jaramillo Álvarez & Juan Carlos Correa Morales, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision-making leveraged by text analytics and interviews with strategists," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 30-49, March.
    16. Sandra Lourenço Amaro & Sofia Barbosa & Gloria Ammerer & Aina Bruno & Jordi Guimerà & Ioannis Orfanoudakis & Anna Ostręga & Evangelia Mylona & Jessica Strydom & Michael Hitch, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating Transitional and Post-Mining Options—An Innovative Perspective from the EIT ReviRIS Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Eloy Hontoria & Alejandro López-Belchí & Nolberto Munier & Francisco Vera-García, 2021. "A MCDM Methodology to Determine the Most Critical Variables in the Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Minichannels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Mohammad Dehghani & Mohammad Mardaneh & Om P. Malik & Josep M. Guerrero & Carlos Sotelo & David Sotelo & Morteza Nazari-Heris & Kamal Al-Haddad & Ricardo A. Ramirez-Mendoza, 2020. "Genetic Algorithm for Energy Commitment in a Power System Supplied by Multiple Energy Carriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Saeedi, Hamid & Behdani, Behzad & Wiegmans, Bart & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2019. "Assessing the technical efficiency of intermodal freight transport chains using a modified network DEA approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 66-86.
    20. Katarina Urošević & Zoran Gligorić & Igor Miljanović & Čedomir Beljić & Miloš Gligorić, 2021. "Novel Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Process (MCRAT and RAPS)—Application in the Mining Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1482-:d:321440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.