IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8482-d428090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moose Management Strategies under Changing Legal and Institutional Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Linas Balčiauskas

    (Laboratory of Mammalian Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Yukichika Kawata

    (Faculty of Economics, Kindai University, 4-1 Kowakae 3-chome, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan)

  • Laima Balčiauskienė

    (Laboratory of Mammalian Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Moose ( Alces alces ) management strategies in Lithuania, East Europe, were analyzed. The study was intended to show the (un)sustainability of the current management approach in relation to changes in hunting rules, hunting organization and development of the responsible administrative bodies. Moose population and bag dynamics were analyzed using I index in connected scatterplots and compound annual growth rates (CAGR). In 1962–2020, the CAGR of the moose population was 3.84%, resulting in a population size increase of nearly 10 times. The seesaw principle in moose management was confirmed, showing three periods of population decrease (1973–1977, 1989–1995, 2000–2005), and two periods of hunting bag decrease (1976–1978 and 1990–1993). All decline phases were related to legal and administrative issues in the country. Since 2006, population growth has not been controlled. Lithuania has no long-term strategy of the moose population management at any administrative level. The current management approach is not sustainable, as it has not ensured long-term stability of the moose population. The current continuous growth of population, followed by only a moderate increase in the hunting bag, is related to the possibility for owners to adopt long-term planning of the hunting plot units.

Suggested Citation

  • Linas Balčiauskas & Yukichika Kawata & Laima Balčiauskienė, 2020. "Moose Management Strategies under Changing Legal and Institutional Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8482-:d:428090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paula Horne & Leena Petäjistö, 2003. "Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(4), pages 472-482.
    2. Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt & Treue, Thorsten, 2012. "Hunting for the Benefits of Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot: Effects on Bushmeat Hunters and Wildlife in the Udzungwa Mountains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1224-1239.
    3. Mattias Boman & Leif Mattsson & Göran Ericsson & Bengt Kriström, 2011. "Moose Hunting Values in Sweden Now and Two Decades Ago: The Swedish Hunters Revisited," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(4), pages 515-530, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linas Balčiauskas & Yukichika Kawata, 2022. "Red Deer in Lithuania: History, Status and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Linas Balčiauskas, 2022. "Mammal Status: Diversity, Abundance and Dynamics: An Editorial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-3, April.
    3. Linas Balčiauskas & Laima Balčiauskienė & John A. Litvaitis & Eugenijus Tijušas, 2020. "Citizen Scientists Showed a Four-Fold Increase of Lynx Numbers in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engelman, Marc & Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan & Gren, Ing-Marie, 2018. "Hunters' trade-off in valuation of different game animals in Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 73-81.
    2. Häggmark-Svensson, Tobias & Elofsson, Katarina & Engelmann, Marc & Gren, Ing-Marie, 2015. "A review of the literature on benefits, costs, and policies for wildlife management," Working Paper Series 2015:1, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department Economics.
    3. Bart Neuts & Peter Nijkamp & Eveline Van Leeuwen, 2012. "Crowding Externalities from Tourist Use of Urban Space," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(3), pages 649-670, June.
    4. Kaiza R. Kaganzi & Aida Cuni-Sanchez & Fatuma Mcharazo & Emanuel H. Martin & Robert A. Marchant & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2021. "Local Perceptions of Climate Change and Adaptation Responses from Two Mountain Regions in Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Olivier Beaumais & Anne Briand & Katrin Millock & Céline Nauges, 2010. "What are Households Willing to Pay for Better Tap Water Quality? A Cross-Country Valuation Study," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10051, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. Ouvrard, Benjamin & Abildtrup, Jens & Bostedt, Göran & Stenger, Anne, 2019. "Determinants of forest owners attitudes towards wood ash recycling in Sweden - Can the nutrient cycle be closed?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Rasolofoson, Ranaivo A. & Nielsen, Martin R. & Jones, Julia P.G., 2018. "The potential of the Global Person Generated Index for evaluating the perceived impacts of conservation interventions on subjective well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 107-118.
    8. Birol, Ekin & Koundouri, Phoebe & Kountoyris, Yiannis, 2008. "Applications of the Choice Experiment Method in Europe: A Review," MPRA Paper 41903, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Jonzén, Niclas & Sand, Håkan & Wabakken, Petter & Swenson, Jon E. & Kindberg, Jonas & Liberg, Olof & Chapron, Guillaume, 2013. "Sharing the bounty—Adjusting harvest to predator return in the Scandinavian human–wolf–bear–moose system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 140-148.
    10. Sahan T. M. Dissanayake & Amy W. Ando, 2014. "Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(2), pages 237-259.
    11. He, Xiaoyang & Poe, Gregory L., 2021. "Exploring the shelf-life of travel cost methods of valuing recreation for benefits transfer," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Sergio Colombo & Nick Hanley, 2008. "How Can We Reduce the Errors from Benefits Transfer? An Investigation Using the Choice Experiment Method," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 128-147.
    13. Colombo, Sergio & Hanley, Nick, 2007. "What Determines Prediction Errors In "Benefits Transfer" Models?," 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK 7967, Agricultural Economics Society.
    14. Sabrina Dressel & Annelie Sjölander-Lindqvist & Maria Johansson & Göran Ericsson & Camilla Sandström, 2021. "Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Ferrini, Silvia & Scarpa, Riccardo, 2007. "Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 342-363, May.
    16. Jayalath, Tharaka A. & Grala, Robert K. & Grado, Stephen C. & Evans, David L., 2021. "Increasing provision of ecosystem services through participation in a conservation program," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    17. Dressel, S. & Ericsson, G. & Johansson, M. & Kalén, C. & Pfeffer, S.E. & Sandström, C., 2020. "Evaluating the outcomes of collaborative wildlife governance: The role of social-ecological system context and collaboration dynamics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Kalén, Christer & Andrén, Henrik & Månsson, Johan & Sand, Håkan, 2022. "Using citizen data in a population model to estimate population size of moose (Alces alces)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    19. Birol, Ekin & Phoebe, Koundouri & Yiannis, Kountouris, 2008. "Using the Choice Experiment Method to Inform River Management in Poland: Flood Risk Reduction vs. Habitat Conservation in the Upper Silesia Region," MPRA Paper 41906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Broch, Stine Wamberg & Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth, 6. "Contract design from a landowner perspective," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 42, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8482-:d:428090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.