IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7870-d418026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Will Mechanizing Mung Bean Harvesting Affect Women Hired Laborers in Myanmar and Bangladesh?

Author

Listed:
  • Cathy Rozel Farnworth

    (Independent Gender Consultant, Pandia Consulting, 48145 Münster, Nordrheinwestfalen, Germany)

  • Aye Moe San

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Yezin Agricultural University, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar)

  • Nanda Dulal Kundu

    (Agricultural Economics Division, Regional Pulses Research Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Madaripur 7901, Bangladesh)

  • Md Monjurul Islam

    (Department of Rural Development, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh)

  • Rownok Jahan

    (Independent Gender Consultant, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh)

  • Lutz Depenbusch

    (World Vegetable Center, P.O. Box 1010, Bangkok 10903, Thailand)

  • Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair

    (World Vegetable Center, South Asia, ICRISAT Campus, Hyderabad 502324, India)

  • Theingi Myint

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Yezin Agricultural University, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar)

  • Pepijn Schreinemachers

    (World Vegetable Center, P.O. Box 1010, Bangkok 10903, Thailand)

Abstract

Farm mechanization can promote the economic sustainability of small farms and in the context of cereal-legume systems strengthen plant protein-based diets, which support human health and environmental sustainability. However, mechanization inevitably displaces hired laborers who depend on manual farm work for their income. Few studies have systematically analyzed the differential effects on women and men hired labor. Here, we use primarily qualitative data from Myanmar and Bangladesh to test the hypothesis that the effects of mechanizing mung bean harvesting—which is now commencing in both countries—are likely to weaken women hired workers’ economic and personal empowerment. We focus on rural landless women laborers as an important part of the agricultural labor force. The results broadly confirm the hypothesis, although there is variation between the research sites. Harvesting mung beans is the only fieldwork task available to many landless women, particularly married women with children, in both countries. Gendered restrictions on women’s mobility and their role as family caregivers, as well as norms about appropriate work for women and men, restrict women’s options regarding alternative work both locally and further away. The effects are likely to be particularly negative in locations with minimal off-farm economic diversity and more restrictive gender norms. Overall, men across all sites will be less affected since their participation rates in harvesting and post-harvest processing are low. They are less restricted by gender norms and can travel freely to find work elsewhere. However, women and men in low asset households will find it problematic to find alternative income sources. Less restrictive gender norms would help to mitigate the adverse effects of farm mechanization. It is important to invest in gender transformative approaches to stimulate change in norms and associated behaviors to make a wider range of choices possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Aye Moe San & Nanda Dulal Kundu & Md Monjurul Islam & Rownok Jahan & Lutz Depenbusch & Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair & Theingi Myint & Pepijn Schreinemachers, 2020. "How Will Mechanizing Mung Bean Harvesting Affect Women Hired Laborers in Myanmar and Bangladesh?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7870-:d:418026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7870/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7870/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cole, S.M. & Kantor, P. & Sarapura, S. & Rajaratnam, S., 2014. "Gender-transformative approaches to address inequalities in food, nutrition and economic outcomes in aquatic agricultural systems," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40459, April.
    2. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Tahseen Jafry & Kanchan Lama & Sushila Chatterjee Nepali & Lone B. Badstue, 2019. "From Working in the Wheat Field to Managing Wheat: Women Innovators in Nepal," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 293-313, April.
    3. Petesch, Patti & Badstue, Lone & Camfield, Laura & Feldman, Shelley & Prain, Gordon & Kantor, Paula, 2018. "Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: The GENNOVATE field methodology," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 3(1), September.
    4. Win, Myat Thida & Thinzar, Aye Mya & Zu, A Myint, 2016. "Supply Side Evidence Of Myanmar’S Growing Agricultural Mechanization Market," Miscellaneous Publications 251851, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Hom Gartaula & Leontine Visser & Anke Niehof, 2012. "Socio-Cultural Dispositions and Wellbeing of the Women Left Behind: A Case of Migrant Households in Nepal," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 401-420, September.
    6. Sraboni, Esha & Quisumbing , Agnes R & Ahmed, Akhter U, 2014. "How Empowered are Bangladeshi Women in the Agricultural Setting? Empirical Evidence using a New Index," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 37(3), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Takashi Kurosaki, 2006. "Labor Contracts, Incentives, and Food Security in Rural Myanmar," Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series d05-134, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    8. Itishree Pattnaik & Kuntala Lahiri-Dutt & Stewart Lockie & Bill Pritchard, 2018. "The feminization of agriculture or the feminization of agrarian distress? Tracking the trajectory of women in agriculture in India," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 138-155, January.
    9. Pepijn Schreinemachers & Teresa Sequeros & Saima Rani & Md. Abdur Rashid & Nithya Vishwanath Gowdru & Muhammad Shahrukh Rahman & Mohammed Razu Ahmed & Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair, 2019. "Counting the beans: quantifying the adoption of improved mungbean varieties in South Asia and Myanmar," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(3), pages 623-634, June.
    10. Badstue, Lone & Lopez, Diana E. & Umansteva, Anya & Williams, George & Elias, Marlene & Farnworth, Cathy Rozel & Rietveld, Anne & Njuguna-Mungai, Esther & Luis, Joyce & Najjar, Dina & Kandiwa, Vongai, 2018. "What drives capacity to innovate? Insights from women and men small-scale farmers in Africa, Asia, and Latin America," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 3(1), September.
    11. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Tahseen Jafry & Preeti Bharati & Lone Badstue & Ashok Yadav, 0. "From Working in the Fields to Taking Control. Towards a Typology of Women's Decision-Making in Wheat in India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    12. Theis, Sophie & Krupnik, Timothy J. & Sultana, Nasrin & Rahman, Syed-Ur & Seymour, Gregory & Abedin, Naveen, 2019. "Gender and agricultural mechanization: A mixed-methods exploration of the impacts of multi-crop reaper-harvester service provision in Bangladesh:," IFPRI discussion papers 1837, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Els Lecoutere & Alessandra Galiè & Bjorn Van Campenhout & Marlène Elias & Markus Ihalainen & Lara Roeven & Preeti Bharati & Ana Maria Paez Valencia & Mary Crossland & Barbara, 2023. "Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 294-316, July.
    2. Phyo Pa Pa Aung & Ji-Yong Lee, 2021. "Technical Efficiency of Mung Bean Producers: The Case of Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Hassan A. A. Sayed & Qishuo Ding & Mahmoud A. Abdelhamid & Joseph O. Alele & Alfadhl Y. Alkhaled & Mohamed Refai, 2022. "Application of Machine Learning to Study the Agricultural Mechanization of Wheat Farms in Egypt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhawana, KC & Race, Digby, 2020. "Women’s approach to farming in the context of feminization of agriculture: A case study from the middle hills of Nepal," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    2. Ruth Haug & Dismas L. Mwaseba & Donald Njarui & Mokhele Moeletsi & Mufunanji Magalasi & Mupenzi Mutimura & Feyisa Hundessa & Julie T. Aamodt, 2021. "Feminization of African Agriculture and the Meaning of Decision-Making for Empowerment and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Margaret A. McEwan & Moses S. Matui & Sarah Mayanja & Sam Namanda & Kwame Ogero, 2023. "Gender dynamics in seed systems: female makeover or male takeover of specialized sweetpotato seed production, in Lake Zone Tanzania?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 693-710, June.
    4. Diana E Lopez & Romain Frelat & Lone B Badstue, 2022. "Towards gender-inclusive innovation: Assessing local conditions for agricultural targeting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Paudel, Gokul P. & Gartaula, Hom & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Craufurd, Peter, 2020. "Gender differentiated small-scale farm mechanization in Nepal hills: An application of exogenous switching treatment regression," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Lone Badstue & Patti Petesch & Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Lara Roeven & Mahlet Hailemariam, 2020. "Women Farmers and Agricultural Innovation: Marital Status and Normative Expectations in Rural Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Henrik Hansen & John Rand & Neda Trifković, 2021. "Traditional and modern employee benefits in Myanmar's manufacturing sector," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-41, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Khed, Vijayalaxmi D. & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2023. "Agency and time poverty: Linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    9. Amita Shah & Itishree Pattnaik, 2021. "Pattern and dynamics of the rural non-farm economy: a case study of Gujarat," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(1), pages 48-70, June.
    10. Sinha, Shreya & Narain, Nivedita & Bhanjdeo, Arundhita, 2022. "Building back better? Resilience as wellbeing for rural migrant households in Bihar, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Sari, I. & McDougall, C. & Rajaratnam, S. & Park, C.M.Y., 2017. "Women’s empowerment in aquaculture: Two case studies from Indonesia," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40703, April.
    12. Lewis, David & Biggs, Stephen & Justice, Scott, 2022. "Rural mechanization for equitable development: disarray, disjuncture and disruption," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112769, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Sandhya R. Mahapatro, 2018. "Impact of Labour Migration on Socioeconomic Position of Left-Behind Women in Bihar," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 61(4), pages 701-718, December.
    14. Paudel, Gokul P. & KC, Dilli Bahadur & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Khanal, Narayan P. & Justice, Scott E. & McDonald, Andrew J., 2019. "Smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: Evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Quisumbing, Agnes & Ahmed, Akhter & Hoddinott, John & Pereira, Audrey & Roy, Shalini, 2021. "Designing for empowerment impact in agricultural development projects: Experimental evidence from the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Stéphanie Jaquet & Thomas Kohler & Gudrun Schwilch, 2019. "Labour Migration in the Middle Hills of Nepal: Consequences on Land Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Giroux, Stacey & Kaminski, Patrick & Waldman, Kurt & Blekking, Jordan & Evans, Tom & Caylor, Kelly K., 2023. "Smallholder social networks: Advice seeking and adaptation in rural Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Iqra Mohiuddin & Muhammad Asif Kamran & Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Mobin-ud-Din Ahmad & Sultan Ali Adil & Raza Ullah & Tasneem Khaliq, 2020. "Scale and Drivers of Female Agricultural Labor: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Sudha Narayanan & Sharada Srinivasan, 2020. "No country for young women farmers: A situation analysis for India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2020-041, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    20. Rajkumar, Vidya Bharathi, 2021. "Male Migration and the Emergence of Female Farm Management in India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315329, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7870-:d:418026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.