IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4797-d370345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Demeterova

    (Department of Geography, Chair for Economic Geography and Tourism Research, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Tatjana Fischer

    (Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement (IRUB), Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, BOKU—University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria)

  • Jürgen Schmude

    (Department of Geography, Chair for Economic Geography and Tourism Research, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Recent EU environmental and spatial policies notably strive towards the development paradigm of green growth and economic competitiveness. However, operationalizing spatial policies through growth-driven GDP logics promotes an unequal race towards narrowly defined developmental ‘success’, while perpetuating social, economic and environmental inequalities. Meanwhile, the EU’s territorial cohesion approach has remained a conceptual ‘black box’, its apparent inadequacy for notably mitigating territorial disparities leading to renewed questions about territorial policy’s relevance, delivery and evaluation. In this paper, we add to calls for redesigning territorial cohesion by proposing a turn towards spatial justice for territorial sustainability. Pointing out the need to refocus on regional capabilities and alternative development trajectories, we argue that the ‘right to not catch up’ enables a more locally meaningful and globally sustainable development. Drawing from regional statistics, policy analyses and an empirical case study of three European Territorial Cooperation programs in the heterogeneous Austrian-Czech-Slovak-Hungarian border region, we illustrate how current EU spatial policy approaches evolve in regional practice and why current policy aims fall short for sustainable transformations. Through interrogating development discourses and their alternatives, we contribute to emerging new perspectives on sustainable territorial development at the European as well as at regional levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4797-:d:370345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Amartya, 2001. "Development as Freedom," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192893307.
    2. Jacek Zaucha & Kai Böhme, 2020. "Measuring territorial cohesion is not a mission impossible," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 627-649, March.
    3. Lisa Van Well, 2012. "Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1549-1567, September.
    4. Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P., 2001. "Monopolistic competition, trade, and endogenous spatial fluctuations," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 51-77, February.
    5. Andreas Faludi, 2016. "EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 302-313, April.
    6. Barbara Demeterova & Bryonny Goodwin-Hawkins & Tatjana Fischer, 2020. "Conceptualisations of Territorial Cohesion in Central European border regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(12), pages 2287-2306, December.
    7. Roberto Ezcurra & Carlos Gil & Pedro Pascual, 2005. "Regional Bipolarization: The Case of the European Union," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 984-995, December.
    8. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier X., 1996. "Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1325-1352, June.
    9. Linda Shi & Eric Chu & Isabelle Anguelovski & Alexander Aylett & Jessica Debats & Kian Goh & Todd Schenk & Karen C. Seto & David Dodman & Debra Roberts & J. Timmons Roberts & Stacy D. VanDeveer, 2016. "Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 131-137, February.
    10. Teresa Sá Marques & Miguel Saraiva & Gonçalo Santinha & Paula Guerra, 2018. "Re‐Thinking Territorial Cohesion in the European Planning Context," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 547-572, July.
    11. Nicolai Van Gorp, 2009. "Backwardness Of Border Regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(3), pages 358-364, July.
    12. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    13. Henk Van Houtum & Ton Van Naerssen, 2002. "Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(2), pages 125-136, May.
    14. Neil Adams & Giancarlo Cotella & Richard Nunes, 2014. "The Engagement of Territorial Knowledge Communities with European Spatial Planning and the Territorial Cohesion Debate: A Baltic Perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 712-734, April.
    15. David Evers, 2008. "Reflections On Territorial Cohesion And European Spatial Planning," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 303-315, July.
    16. Romina Boarini & Åsa Johansson & Marco Mira d'Ercole, 2006. "Alternative Measures of Well-Being," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 476, OECD Publishing.
    17. Susan S. Fainstein, 2001. "Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their Implications for Social Justice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 884-888, December.
    18. Philippe Doucet, 2006. "Territorial Cohesion of Tomorrow: A Path to Cooperation or Competition?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1473-1485, November.
    19. Guillaume Faburel, 2012. "The Environment as a Factor of Spatial Injustice: A New Challenge for the Sustainable Development of European Regions?," Chapters, in: Chaouki Ghenai (ed.), Sustainable Development - Policy and Urban Development - Tourism, Life Science, Management and Environment, IntechOpen.
    20. Romina Boarini & Åsa Johansson & Marco Mira d'Ercole, 2006. "Alternative Measures of Well-Being," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 33, OECD Publishing.
    21. Annekatrin Niebuhr & Silvia Stiller, 2003. "Territorial disparities in Europe," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 38(3), pages 156-164, May.
    22. Heidenreich, Martin, 2005. "The renewal of regional capabilities: Experimental regionalism in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 739-757, June.
    23. François Perroux, 1950. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(1), pages 89-104.
    24. Daniel Rauhut & Alois Humer, 2020. "EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: trajectories in economic thought," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 2116-2133, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Cordini & Tatjana Boczy & Ruggero Cefalo, 2021. "Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Jarrín-V, Pablo & Falconí, Fander & Cango, Pedro & Ramos-Martin, Jesus, 2021. "Knowledge gaps in Latin America and the Caribbean and economic development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Lodovico Gherardi & Anna Maria Linsalata & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Rebecca Levy Orelli, 2021. "Accountability and Reporting for Sustainability and Public Value: Challenges in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Marco Rossitti & Marta Dell’Ovo & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): A Critical Analysis of the Indicator Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Luigi Capoani & Gianluca Bortoletto & Samuele Fratini & Violetta Van Veen & Cristoforo Imbesi, 2022. "The Genesis and Evolution of the Blue Banana Region," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 5-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanié Rossouw & Talita Greyling, 2017. "Regional disparities in non-economic quality of life in South Africa: convergence or divergence?," Working Papers 2017-06, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    2. Paul Allin, 2015. "Official Statistics On Personal Well-Being: Some Reflections On The Development And Some Reflections On The Development And In The Uk," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 397-408, September.
    3. Florence Jany-Catrice & Stephan Kampelmann, 2007. "L'indicateur de bien-être économique : une application à la France," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 22(1), pages 107-148.
    4. Francesca Giambona & Mariano Porcu & Isabella Sulis, 2023. "Does education protect families' well-being in times of crisis? Measurement issues and empirical findings from IT-SILC data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 299-328, March.
    5. Donadelli, M. & Jüppner, M. & Paradiso, A. & Ghisletti, M., 2020. "Tornado activity, house prices, and stock returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Lars Osberg & Andrew Sharpe, 2011. "Moving from a GDP-Based to a Well-Being Based Metric of Economic Performance and Social Progress: Results from the Index of Economic Well-Being for OECD Countries, 1980-2009," CSLS Research Reports 2011-12, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    7. Paul Dolan & Tessa Peasgood, 2008. "Measuring Well-Being for Public Policy: Preferences or Experiences?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(S2), pages 5-31, June.
    8. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 555-562, August.
    9. Modrego, Félix & Berdegué, Julio A., 2015. "A Large-Scale Mapping of Territorial Development Dynamics in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 11-31.
    10. Ryo Itoh, 2010. "Economic Development And Non‐Monotonic Spatial Transitions," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 234-251, June.
    11. Allin Paul, 2015. "Official Statistics on Personal Well-Being: Some Reflections on the Development and use of Subjective Well-Being Measures in the UK," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 397-408, September.
    12. Marta Cordini & Tatjana Boczy & Ruggero Cefalo, 2021. "Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Carla Collicelli, 2013. "Subjective Indicators in the Health Sector and Their Usefulness in Policy Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 87-103, October.
    14. Garashchuk, Anna & Castillo, Fernando Isla & Rivera, Pablo Podadera, 2023. "Economic cohesion and development of the European Union's regions and member states - A methodological proposal to measure and identify the degree of regional economic cohesion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Alessandra Faggian & M. Rose Olfert & Mark D. Partridge, 2011. "Inferring regional well-being from individual revealed preferences: the 'voting with your feet' approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 5(1), pages 163-180.
    16. Van Ootegem, Luc & Spillemaeckers, Sophie, 2010. "With a focus on well-being and capabilities," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 384-390, June.
    17. Xing, Yangang & Horner, R. Malcolm W. & El-Haram, Mohamed A. & Bebbington, Jan, 2009. "A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 209-224.
    18. Cappelli, Federica & Caravaggio, Nicola & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Buen Vivir and forest conservation in Bolivia: False promises or effective change?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    20. Francová, Olga & Korhonen, Kari & Kovačević, Dušan, 2023. "Quality of life: A way to buttress crisis program evaluations?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4797-:d:370345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.