IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p327-d303754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta

Author

Listed:
  • Tuomo Joensuu

    (Construction Management and Economics Unit, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Markku Norvasuo

    (Construction Management and Economics Unit, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Harry Edelman

    (Construction Management and Economics Unit, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

Policy objectives aimed toward zero-energy buildings call for the utilization of building-integrated renewable energy and distributed energy resources (DER). To enhance the utilization of DER, previous literature proposed the concept of an integrated community energy system (ICES). This research suggested using superblocks (units of multiple urban blocks) to define geographical limits, social contexts, and possibly common administrations for ICESs along with other living- and sustainability-related activities in an urban context. Through interviews with key stakeholders and an analysis, this research investigates the applicability of the superblock-ICES as a way of reaching the low-carbon objectives in the Hiedanranta brownfield development project in the city of Tampere, Finland. This research confirms that the driving forces of community-based solutions are economic benefits, technical development, and objectives of sustainability, and reveals or confirms that social acceptability, missing planning practices, economic risk, and missing or hindering legislation are the main issues or barriers of superblock-ICESs. For a wider adoption of superblock-ICESs, this research suggests cross-disciplinary piloting, together with developing planning practices and simulation tools. In Finland, legislative reforms are needed to remove the barriers and clarify issues related to security, reliability, customer protection, and public interest in governing a locally and collectively owned energy system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuomo Joensuu & Markku Norvasuo & Harry Edelman, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:327-:d:303754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Wei & Jin, Xiaolong & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie & Xu, Xiandong & Yu, Xiaodan & Zhao, Bo, 2018. "A two-stage multi-objective scheduling method for integrated community energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 428-441.
    2. Müller, Simon C. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 492-503.
    3. Amro Elshurafa & Shahad Albardi & Carlo Andrea Bollino, 2017. "Estimating the Learning Curve of Solar PV Balance-of-Systems for Over 20 Countries," Discussion Papers ks-2017--dp015, King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center.
    4. Soshinskaya, Mariya & Crijns-Graus, Wina H.J. & Guerrero, Josep M. & Vasquez, Juan C., 2014. "Microgrids: Experiences, barriers and success factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 659-672.
    5. Orehounig, Kristina & Evins, Ralph & Dorer, Viktor, 2015. "Integration of decentralized energy systems in neighbourhoods using the energy hub approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 277-289.
    6. Delso, Javier & Martín, Belén & Ortega, Emilio, 2018. "A new procedure using network analysis and kernel density estimations to evaluate the effect of urban configurations on pedestrian mobility. The case study of Vitoria –Gasteiz," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-72.
    7. Rehman, Hassam ur & Hirvonen, Janne & Sirén, Kai, 2018. "Performance comparison between optimized design of a centralized and semi-decentralized community size solar district heating system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1072-1094.
    8. von Wirth, Timo & Gislason, Linda & Seidl, Roman, 2018. "Distributed energy systems on a neighborhood scale: Reviewing drivers of and barriers to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2618-2628.
    9. Walker, Gordon, 2008. "What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4401-4405, December.
    10. Engelken, Maximilian & Römer, Benedikt & Drescher, Marcus & Welpe, Isabell M. & Picot, Arnold, 2016. "Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 795-809.
    11. Mendes, Gonçalo & Ioakimidis, Christos & Ferrão, Paulo, 2011. "On the planning and analysis of Integrated Community Energy Systems: A review and survey of available tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4836-4854.
    12. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Peng, Zhenwei & Feng, Yifu, 2017. "Planning community energy system in the industry 4.0 era: Achievements, challenges and a potential solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 710-721.
    13. Geels, Frank W., 2002. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1257-1274, December.
    14. Michael W. Mehaffy & Sergio Porta & Ombretta Romice, 2015. "The "neighborhood unit" on trial: a case study in the impacts of urban morphology," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 199-217, June.
    15. Bünning, Felix & Wetter, Michael & Fuchs, Marcus & Müller, Dirk, 2018. "Bidirectional low temperature district energy systems with agent-based control: Performance comparison and operation optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 502-515.
    16. Xu, Xiandong & Jin, Xiaolong & Jia, Hongjie & Yu, Xiaodan & Li, Kang, 2015. "Hierarchical management for integrated community energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 231-243.
    17. Cristina Acosta & Mariana Ortega & Till Bunsen & Binod Prasad Koirala & Amineh Ghorbani, 2018. "Facilitating Energy Transition through Energy Commons: An Application of Socio-Ecological Systems Framework for Integrated Community Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Merei, Ghada & Moshövel, Janina & Magnor, Dirk & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2016. "Optimization of self-consumption and techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in commercial applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-178.
    19. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    20. Zhou, Yizhou & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang & Cheung, Kwok W. & Zang, Haixiang & Chen, Sheng, 2018. "A robust optimization approach for integrated community energy system in energy and ancillary service markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-15.
    21. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    22. Har Ye Kan & Ann Forsyth & Peter Rowe, 2017. "Redesigning China’s superblock neighbourhoods: policies, opportunities and challenges," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 757-777, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brenner, Anna-Katharina & Haas, Willi & Rudloff, Christian & Lorenz, Florian & Wieser, Georg & Haberl, Helmut & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Pichler, Melanie, 2024. "How experiments with superblocks in Vienna shape climate and health outcomes and interact with the urban planning regime," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Na & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Lukszo, Zofia, 2022. "Cost allocation in integrated community energy systems — Performance assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    3. Binod Prasad Koirala & José Pablo Chaves Ávila & Tomás Gómez & Rudi A. Hakvoort & Paulien M. Herder, 2016. "Local Alternative for Energy Supply: Performance Assessment of Integrated Community Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Longxi Li, 2020. "Optimal Coordination Strategies for Load Service Entity and Community Energy Systems Based on Centralized and Decentralized Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Koirala, Binod Prasad & van Oost, Ellen & van der Windt, Henny, 2018. "Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 570-585.
    7. Cristina Acosta & Mariana Ortega & Till Bunsen & Binod Prasad Koirala & Amineh Ghorbani, 2018. "Facilitating Energy Transition through Energy Commons: An Application of Socio-Ecological Systems Framework for Integrated Community Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Binod Prasad Koirala & Ellen van Oost & Henny van der Windt, 2020. "Innovation Dynamics of Socio-Technical Alignment in Community Energy Storage: The Cases of DrTen and Ecovat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Charani Shandiz, Saeid & Rismanchi, Behzad & Foliente, Greg, 2021. "Energy master planning for net-zero emission communities: State of the art and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Wolsink, Maarten, 2020. "Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Thomas Sachs & Anna Gründler & Milos Rusic & Gilbert Fridgen, 2019. "Framing Microgrid Design from a Business and Information Systems Engineering Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 729-744, December.
    12. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Chu, Xiangyang & Peng, Zhenwei, 2018. "A novel optimization model based on game tree for multi-energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 109-121.
    13. Scheller, Fabian & Bruckner, Thomas, 2019. "Energy system optimization at the municipal level: An analysis of modeling approaches and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 444-461.
    14. Zhang, Youjun & Hao, Junhong & Ge, Zhihua & Zhang, Fuxiang & Du, Xiaoze, 2021. "Optimal clean heating mode of the integrated electricity and heat energy system considering the comprehensive energy-carbon price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Vallecha, Harshit & Bhattacharjee, Debraj & Osiri, John Kalu & Bhola, Prabha, 2021. "Evaluation of barriers and enablers through integrative multicriteria decision mapping: Developing sustainable community energy in Indian context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Li, Na & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Cost allocation in integrated community energy systems - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Warneryd, Martin & Håkansson, Maria & Karltorp, Kersti, 2020. "Unpacking the complexity of community microgrids: A review of institutions’ roles for development of microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Hugo Lucas & Ruth Carbajo & Tomoo Machiba & Evgeny Zhukov & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Improving Public Attitude towards Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Eitan, Avri & Herman, Lior & Fischhendler, Itay & Rosen, Gillad, 2019. "Community–private sector partnerships in renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 95-104.
    20. Bouw, Kathelijne & Noorman, Klaas Jan & Wiekens, Carina J. & Faaij, André, 2021. "Local energy planning in the built environment: An analysis of model characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:327-:d:303754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.