IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v8y2015i2p199-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The "neighborhood unit" on trial: a case study in the impacts of urban morphology

Author

Listed:
  • Michael W. Mehaffy
  • Sergio Porta
  • Ombretta Romice

Abstract

The organization of modern city planning into "neighborhood units" - most commonly associated with the Clarence Perry proposal of 1929 - has been enormously influential in the evolution of modern city form, and at the same time has also been the subject of intense controversy and debate that continues to the present day. New issues under debate include social and economic diversity, maintenance of viable pedestrian and public transit modes, viability of internalized community service hubs, and efficient use of energy and natural resources, including greenhouse gas emissions. We trace the history of this controversy up to the present day, and we discuss new developments that may point the way to needed reforms of best practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael W. Mehaffy & Sergio Porta & Ombretta Romice, 2015. "The "neighborhood unit" on trial: a case study in the impacts of urban morphology," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 199-217, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:199-217
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2014.908786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2014.908786
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2014.908786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duy Thinh Do & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2019. "A Comparative Study of User Behaviors on Unimproved and Improved Street Spaces in Da Nang, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Tuomo Joensuu & Markku Norvasuo & Harry Edelman, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Lin Lin & Xueming (Jimmy) Chen & Anne Vernez Moudon, 2021. "Measuring the Urban Forms of Shanghai’s City Center and Its New Districts: A Neighborhood-Level Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Ziyao Zhao & Yi Zhang & Yi Zhang & Kaifeng Ji & He Qi, 2020. "Neural-Network-Based Dynamic Distribution Model of Parking Space Under Sharing and Non-Sharing Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Martin Scoppa & Rim Anabtawi, 2021. "Connectivity in Superblock Street Networks: Measuring Distance, Directness, and the Diversity of Pedestrian Paths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Scoppa, Martin & Bawazir, Khawla & Alawadi, Khaled, 2019. "Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 770-782.
    7. Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Ayyoob Sharifi & Mohammad Hajian Hossein Abadi & Zahra Moradi, 2023. "From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Paweł Pedrycz, 2021. "Form-Based Regulations to Prevent the Loss of Urbanity of Historic Small Towns: Replicability of the Monte Carasso Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:199-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.