IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p622-d200662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biochemical Hydrogen Potential Tests Using Different Inocula

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Pecorini

    (DESTEC—Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesco Baldi

    (DIEF—Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Renato Iannelli

    (DESTEC—Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Four inocula collected from different operating facilities were tested in their hydrogenic performances by means of two biochemical hydrogen potential test set-ups using sucrose and food waste as substrates, with the aim of evaluating the influence of inoculum media in batch fermentative assays. The selected inocula were: activated sludge collected from the aerobic unit of a municipal wastewater treatment plant, digested sludge from an anaerobic reactor treating organic waste and cattle manure, digested sludge from an anaerobic reactor treating agroindustrial residues, and digested sludge from an anaerobic reactor of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Test results, in terms of specific hydrogen production, hydrogen conversion efficiency, and volatile solids removal efficiency, were significantly dependent on the type of inoculum. Statistical analysis showed different results, indicating that findings were due to the different inocula used in the tests. In particular, assays performed with activated sludge showed the highest performances for both substrates and both experimental set-ups.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Pecorini & Francesco Baldi & Renato Iannelli, 2019. "Biochemical Hydrogen Potential Tests Using Different Inocula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:622-:d:200662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    2. Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina & Girotto, Francesca & Rafieenia, Razieh & Danieli, Luciano & Alibardi, Luca, 2018. "Two-stage anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste – Effects of process conditions during batch tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 14-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domagoj Talapko & Jasminka Talapko & Ivan Erić & Ivana Škrlec, 2023. "Biological Hydrogen Production from Biowaste Using Dark Fermentation, Storage and Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Isabella Pecorini & Renato Iannelli, 2020. "Characterization of Excavated Waste of Different Ages in View of Multiple Resource Recovery in Landfill Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Isabella Pecorini & Eleonora Peruzzi & Elena Albini & Serena Doni & Cristina Macci & Grazia Masciandaro & Renato Iannelli, 2020. "Evaluation of MSW Compost and Digestate Mixtures for a Circular Economy Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Isabella Pecorini & Elena Rossi & Renato Iannelli, 2020. "Bromatological, Proximate and Ultimate Analysis of OFMSW for Different Seasons and Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Isabella Pecorini & Elena Rossi & Simone Becarelli & Francesco Baldi & Simona Di Gregorio & Renato Iannelli, 2023. "Wet Anaerobic Codigestion of Sewage Sludge and OFMSW in Pilot-Scale Continuously Stirred Tank Reactors: Focus on the Reactor Microbial Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Baldi, F. & Pecorini, I. & Iannelli, R., 2019. "Comparison of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and activated sludge for hydrogen and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1755-1765.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    2. Sayedin, Farid & Kermanshahi-pour, Azadeh & He, Quan Sophia, 2019. "Evaluating the potential of a novel anaerobic baffled reactor for anaerobic digestion of thin stillage: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and recycle ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 975-983.
    3. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    4. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    5. Rajat Kumar Sharma & Mohammad Ali Nazari & Juma Haydary & Triveni Prasad Singh & Sandip Mandal, 2023. "A Review on Advanced Processes of Biohydrogen Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass with Special Emphasis on Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Trchounian, Karen & Poladyan, Anna & Trchounian, Armen, 2016. "Optimizing strategy for Escherichia coli growth and hydrogen production during glycerol fermentation in batch culture: Effects of some heavy metal ions and their mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 335-340.
    7. Tran Thi Giang & Siriporn Lunprom & Qiang Liao & Alissara Reungsang & Apilak Salakkam, 2019. "Enhancing Hydrogen Production from Chlorella sp. Biomass by Pre-Hydrolysis with Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (PSSF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Vasmara, Ciro & Marchetti, Rosa & Carminati, Domenico, 2021. "Wastewater from the production of lactic acid bacteria as feedstock in anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Ayiguzhali Tuluhong & Qingpu Chang & Lirong Xie & Zhisen Xu & Tengfei Song, 2024. "Current Status of Green Hydrogen Production Technology: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-47, October.
    10. Vaez, Elhamossadat & Zilouei, Hamid, 2020. "Towards the development of biofuel production from paper mill effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1408-1415.
    11. Zdeněk Jegla & Silvio Bonaita & Komi Apélété Amou & Marcus Reppich, 2025. "Assessing the Theoretical Biohydrogen Potential from Agricultural Residues Using Togo as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.
    13. Chalima, Angelina & Hatzidaki, Angeliki & Karnaouri, Anthi & Topakas, Evangelos, 2019. "Integration of a dark fermentation effluent in a microalgal-based biorefinery for the production of high-added value omega-3 fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 130-138.
    14. Elbeshbishy, Elsayed & Dhar, Bipro Ranjan & Nakhla, George & Lee, Hyung-Sool, 2017. "A critical review on inhibition of dark biohydrogen fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 656-668.
    15. Karolina Kucharska & Patrycja Makoś-Chełstowska & Edyta Słupek & Jacek Gębicki, 2021. "Management of Dark Fermentation Broth via Bio Refining and Photo Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Luo, Shuai & Jain, Akshay & Aguilera, Anibal & He, Zhen, 2017. "Effective control of biohythane composition through operational strategies in an innovative microbial electrolysis cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 879-886.
    17. Batista, Ana Paula & Gouveia, Luísa & Marques, Paula A.S.S., 2018. "Fermentative hydrogen production from microalgal biomass by a single strain of bacterium Enterobacter aerogenes – Effect of operational conditions and fermentation kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 203-209.
    18. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Norouzi, Omid & Mersky, Ronald L., 2019. "The effectiveness of anaerobic digestion of bio-waste in replacing primary energies: An EU28 case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 347-354.
    19. Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Cardozo, Emanuélle & Bittencourt Machado, Jones & Maximilla Pereira, Peterson & Costa dos Santos, Maele & Gomes de Souza, Eduarda & Haertel, Paula & Kunde Correa, Erico & Vie, 2023. "Hydrogen and electricity potential generation from rice husks and persiculture biomass in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Ekwenna, Emeka Boniface & Wang, Yaodong & Roskilly, Anthony, 2023. "Bioenergy production from pretreated rice straw in Nigeria: An analysis of novel three-stage anaerobic digestion for hydrogen and methane co-generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:622-:d:200662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.