IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4674-d1741046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Theoretical Biohydrogen Potential from Agricultural Residues Using Togo as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Zdeněk Jegla

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Silvio Bonaita

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, An der Hochschule 1, 86161 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Komi Apélété Amou

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, University of Lomé, Lomé 02 BP 1515, Togo)

  • Marcus Reppich

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic
    Faculty of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, An der Hochschule 1, 86161 Augsburg, Germany)

Abstract

Hydrogen is key to achieving a net-zero carbon future, yet current production remains predominantly fossil-based. Biohydrogen derived from agricultural residues represents a sustainable alternative aligned with circular economy principles. While several studies have assessed the bioenergy potential from agricultural residues in various African countries, their potential in Togo remains largely unexplored. This study employed an exploratory mixed-methods approach to quantify residue availability, evaluate production pathways, and estimate potential biohydrogen yields. Secondary data on crop production from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and theoretical conversion factors were used to assess the availability of agricultural residues from the eight major crops in Togo, resulting in a residue potential of 7.95 million tons per year. Considering ecological and competing aspects of residue utilization, a sustainable share of 3.1 to 6.6 million tons was estimated to be available for biohydrogen production, depending on the residue recoverability assumptions. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was used to evaluate different biohydrogen production processes, identifying dark fermentation as the most suitable due to its low energy requirements and decentralized applicability. The theoretical biohydrogen potential was estimated at 20,991–42,293 tons per year (2.5–5.1 PJ per year) based on biochemical residue composition data and stoichiometric calculations. This study established a baseline assessment of biohydrogen potential from agricultural residues in Togo, offering a methodological framework for assessing biohydrogen potential in other regions. The results also underscore the need for site-specific data to reduce uncertainty and support evidence-based energy planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdeněk Jegla & Silvio Bonaita & Komi Apélété Amou & Marcus Reppich, 2025. "Assessing the Theoretical Biohydrogen Potential from Agricultural Residues Using Togo as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4674-:d:1741046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fariha Kanwal & Angel A. J. Torriero, 2022. "Biohydrogen—A Green Fuel for Sustainable Energy Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Wenting Cheng & Sora Lee, 2022. "How Green Are the National Hydrogen Strategies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Kelly-Yong, Tau Len & Lee, Keat Teong & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman & Bhatia, Subhash, 2007. "Potential of hydrogen from oil palm biomass as a source of renewable energy worldwide," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5692-5701, November.
    4. Alison L. Olechowski & Steven D. Eppinger & Nitin Joglekar & Katharina Tomaschek, 2020. "Technology readiness levels: Shortcomings and improvement opportunities," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 395-408, July.
    5. Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad & Zhou, John L. & Li, Xiaowei & Afsari, Morteza & Altaee, Ali, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    7. Escapa, A. & Mateos, R. & Martínez, E.J. & Blanes, J., 2016. "Microbial electrolysis cells: An emerging technology for wastewater treatment and energy recovery. From laboratory to pilot plant and beyond," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 942-956.
    8. José Ramón Copa Rey & Cecilia Mateos-Pedrero & Andrei Longo & Bruna Rijo & Paulo Brito & Paulo Ferreira & Catarina Nobre, 2024. "Renewable Hydrogen from Biomass: Technological Pathways and Economic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-36, July.
    9. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Nikolaidis, Pavlos & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2017. "A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 597-611.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinxin & Zhao, Junhui & He, Chao & Liu, Liang & Li, Gang & Pan, Xiaohui & Xu, Guizhuan & Lu, Chaoyang & Zhang, Quanguo & Jiao, Youzhou, 2023. "A new approach for evaluating photosynthetic bio-hydrogen production: The dissipation rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Rajat Kumar Sharma & Mohammad Ali Nazari & Juma Haydary & Triveni Prasad Singh & Sandip Mandal, 2023. "A Review on Advanced Processes of Biohydrogen Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass with Special Emphasis on Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Ahmed Fathy & Hegazy Rezk & Dalia Yousri & Abdullah G. Alharbi & Sulaiman Alshammari & Yahia B. Hassan, 2023. "Maximizing Bio-Hydrogen Production from an Innovative Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Hasan Ozcan & Rami S. El-Emam & Bahman Amini Horri, 2023. "Recent Advances in High-Temperature Steam Electrolysis with Solid Oxide Electrolysers for Green Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-50, April.
    6. Shahbaz, Muhammad & yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Patrick, David Onoja & Ammar, Muhammad, 2017. "The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 468-476.
    7. Ramprakash, Balasubramani & Lindblad, Peter & Eaton-Rye, Julian J. & Incharoensakdi, Aran, 2022. "Current strategies and future perspectives in biological hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Machineni, Lakshmi & Deepanraj, B. & Chew, Kit Wayne & Rao, A. Gangagni, 2023. "Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstock: Abiotic and biotic methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Ghimire, Anish & Ezeokoli, Obinna T. & Rao, Subramanya & Ngan, Wing Y. & Habimana, Olivier & Yao, Yuan & Yang, Pu & Yiu Fung, Aster Hei & Yoro, Kelvin O. & Daramola, Michael O. & , 2021. "Valorization of volatile fatty acids from the dark fermentation waste Streams-A promising pathway for a biorefinery concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Liang, Dandan & Zhang, Lijuan & He, Weihua & Li, Chao & Liu, Junfeng & Liu, Shaoqin & Lee, Hyung-Sool & Feng, Yujie, 2020. "Efficient hydrogen recovery with CoP-NF as cathode in microbial electrolysis cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Antony V. Samrot & Deenadhayalan Rajalakshmi & Mahendran Sathiyasree & Subramanian Saigeetha & Kasirajan Kasipandian & Nachiyar Valli & Nellore Jayshree & Pandurangan Prakash & Nagarajan Shobana, 2023. "A Review on Biohydrogen Sources, Production Routes, and Its Application as a Fuel Cell," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Ferraren-De Cagalitan, D.D.T. & Abundo, M.L.S., 2021. "A review of biohydrogen production technology for application towards hydrogen fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. A K M Khabirul Islam & Patrick S. M. Dunlop & Neil J. Hewitt & Rose Lenihan & Caterina Brandoni, 2021. "Bio-Hydrogen Production from Wastewater: A Comparative Study of Low Energy Intensive Production Processes," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    16. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    17. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    18. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    19. Mamo Abawalo & Krzysztof Pikoń & Marcin Landrat & Waldemar Ścierski, 2025. "Hydrogen Production from Biowaste: A Systematic Review of Conversion Technologies, Environmental Impacts, and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-42, August.
    20. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4674-:d:1741046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.