IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p432-d197935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Processes and Collective Impact in Tourist Rural Villages—Insights from a Comparative Analysis between Argentinian and Italian Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Chiodo

    (Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Via Balzarini, 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

  • Héctor Luis Adriani

    (Centro de Investigaciones Geográficas CIG IdIHCS UNLP-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Calle 51 Entre 124 y 125 No 0, 1925 Ensenada, Argentina)

  • Fernando Pablo Navarro

    (Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo del Turismo, Cidetur-EEyN, Escuela de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Caseros 2241, B1650 San Martín, Argentina)

  • Rita Salvatore

    (Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Via Balzarini, 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

Abstract

Multi-case-study research conducted in some rural villages of Argentina and Italy is intended to propose a model of analysis and monitoring of the “collaborative processes” which stands behind the tourist enhancement of local assets. Based on the definition of “collective impact”, three main issues are analyzed: (1) the shortage of social capital, typical of some contemporary rural areas as a social problem; (2) the commitment of actors from different sectors to the common agenda of tourist development; (3) the structured form of coordination driven by extra-local organizations and programs, aimed at fostering sustainable tourism in rural villages. These issues are developed into key concepts used for the comparative description and analysis of the cases and for the definition of a common model of measurement and monitoring of the ongoing development processes. The main results are synthesized into a bidimensional plot, where the x-axis represents the “integration” dimension and the y-axis the “coordination”. Each village is then represented as a point of the Cartesian plan. The final idea is to use the model to monitor the processes within each different rural village and to measure the changes over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Chiodo & Héctor Luis Adriani & Fernando Pablo Navarro & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Collaborative Processes and Collective Impact in Tourist Rural Villages—Insights from a Comparative Analysis between Argentinian and Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:432-:d:197935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasuo Ohe & Adriano Ciani, 2012. "Accessing demand characteristics of agritourism in Italy," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 18(2), pages 281-296, December.
    2. Phillip, Sharon & Hunter, Colin & Blackstock, Kirsty, 2010. "A typology for defining agritourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 754-758.
    3. Salvatore, Rita & Chiodo, Emilio & Fantini, Andrea, 2018. "Tourism transition in peripheral rural areas: Theories, issues and strategies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 41-51.
    4. Victoria Sanagustin-Fons & Teresa Lafita-Cortés & José A. Moseñe, 2018. "Social Perception of Rural Tourism Impact: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Karin Mahony & Jurgens Van Zyl, 2002. "The impacts of tourism investment on rural communities: Three case studies in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 83-103.
    6. Bertolini, Paola & Pagliacci, Francesco, . "Quality of life and territorial imbalances. A focus on italian inner and rural areas," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 6(2).
    7. Yasuo Ohe & Adriano Ciani, 2011. "Evaluation of Agritourism Activity in Italy: Facility Based or Local Culture Based?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 17(3), pages 581-601, June.
    8. Gil Arroyo, Claudia & Barbieri, Carla & Rozier Rich, Samantha, 2013. "Defining agritourism: A comparative study of stakeholders' perceptions in Missouri and North Carolina," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Cehan & Mihail Eva & Corneliu Iațu & Carlos Costa, 2020. "Inquiring Structure and Forms of Collaboration in Tourism through Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Luigi Mastronardi & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Community-Based Cooperatives: A New Business Model for the Development of Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Emilio Chiodo & Andrea Fantini & Lori Dickes & Temitope Arogundade & R. David Lamie & Lucilene Assing & Corinne Stewart & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Agritourism in Mountainous Regions—Insights from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    5. De Toni, Andrea & Vizzarri, Matteo & Di Febbraro, Mirko & Lasserre, Bruno & Noguera, Joan & Di Martino, Paolo, 2021. "Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial evidence to support policy contextualization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Franklin Omar Zavaleta Chavez Arroyo & Alex Javier Sánchez Pantaleón & Yajaira Paulina Navarro-Mendoza & Rosse Marie Esparza-Huamanchumo, 2023. "Community Tourism Conditions and Sustainable Management of a Community Tourism Association: The Case of Cruz Pata, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Giovanni Peira & Davide Longo & Francesca Pucciarelli & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2021. "Rural Tourism Destination: The Ligurian Farmers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Andrea Salustri, 2022. "An Out-of-Town Trip in the Province of Rieti: A Multidimensional Analysis of the Tourism Attractiveness and Territorial Development of the Localities," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Biconne, Valentina & Colombelli, Alessandra, 2024. "Needs and Barriers of Innovation and Coordination Perceived by DMOs, Trade Associations and Tourism Consortia," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202417, University of Turin.
    10. Emilio Chiodo & Luigi Giordano & Jody Tubi & Rita Salvatore, 2020. "Wine Routes and Sustainable Social Organization within Local Tourist Supply: Case Studies of Two Italian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Chiodo & Andrea Fantini & Lori Dickes & Temitope Arogundade & R. David Lamie & Lucilene Assing & Corinne Stewart & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Agritourism in Mountainous Regions—Insights from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Sofia Karampela & Alexis Andreopoulos & Alex Koutsouris, 2021. "“Agro”, “Agri”, or “Rural”: The Different Viewpoints of Tourism Research Combined with Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2019. "Recreational Services Provision and Farm Diversification: A Technical Efficiency Analysis on Italian Agritourism," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    5. Chiara Aleffi & Sabrina Tomasi & Concetta Ferrara & Cristina Santini & Gigliola Paviotti & Federica Baldoni & Alessio Cavicchi, 2020. "Universities and Wineries: Supporting Sustainable Development in Disadvantaged Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Agnès Durrande-Moreau & François Courvoisier & Anne-Marie Bocquet, 2017. "The new integrated agritourism, a sustainable tourism trend [Le nouvel agritourisme intégré, une tendance du tourisme durable]," Post-Print hal-01555233, HAL.
    8. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2021. "Economic performance of agritourism: an analysis of farms located in a less favoured area in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Flanigan, Sharon & Blackstock, Kirsty & Hunter, Colin, 2014. "Agritourism from the perspective of providers and visitors: a typology-based study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 394-405.
    10. Kumar Bhatta & Yasuo Ohe, 2020. "A Review of Quantitative Studies in Agritourism: The Implications for Developing Countries," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Angelo Belliggiano & Eugenio Cejudo Garcia & Marilena Labianca & Francisco Navarro Valverde & Stefano De Rubertis, 2020. "The “Eco-Effectiveness” of Agritourism Dynamics in Italy and Spain: A Tool for Evaluating Regional Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Matthias Firgo & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2023. "The causal effect of agritourism on farm survival," Economics working papers 2023-15, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    15. Liang, Austin Rong-Da, 2017. "Considering the role of agritourism co-creation from a service-dominant logic perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 354-367.
    16. Tong Wu & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & John N. Ng’ombe & Richard T. Melstrom, 2020. "Chinese Demand for Agritourism in Rural America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    17. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Dubois, Charline & Cawley, Mary & Schmitz, Serge, 2017. "The tourist on the farm: A ‘muddled’ image," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 298-311.
    19. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2017. "When distinction does not pay off - Investigating the determinants of European agritourism prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-52.
    20. Gualter Couto & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Carlos Santos & Pedro Pimentel & Áurea Sousa & Sandra Faria & Maria da Graça Batista, 2021. "Guidelines for Tourism Sustainability in Ultra-Peripheral Territories: A Research Based on the Azores Region’s Touristic Companies’ Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:432-:d:197935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.