IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p6940-d294602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of Industrial Symbiosis in the Humber Region Using the EPOS Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Hélène Cervo

    (Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, 13451 Marseille, France
    Electrical Energy Laboratory (EELAB), Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park—Campus A, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 131, B-9052 Gent, Belgium
    INEOS Technologies France, 13117 Lavéra, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work and are cited in alphabetical order.)

  • Stéphane Ogé

    (EVS-CRGA UMR 5600, University of Lyon 3, 69362 Lyon CEDEX 7, France
    ITECH, 69134 Ecully CEDEX, France
    Strane Innovation, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work and are cited in alphabetical order.)

  • Amtul Samie Maqbool

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory (EELAB), Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park—Campus A, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 131, B-9052 Gent, Belgium)

  • Francisco Mendez Alva

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory (EELAB), Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park—Campus A, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 131, B-9052 Gent, Belgium)

  • Lindsay Lessard

    (Quantis, EPFL Science Park (PSE-D), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Alexandre Bredimas

    (Strane Innovation, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France)

  • Jean-Henry Ferrasse

    (Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, 13451 Marseille, France)

  • Greet Van Eetvelde

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory (EELAB), Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park—Campus A, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 131, B-9052 Gent, Belgium
    INEOS Technologies France, 13117 Lavéra, France)

Abstract

For the last 20 years, the field of industrial symbiosis (IS) has raised interest among academics and industries. IS consists of dissimilar entities sharing and valorising underutilised resources such as materials, energy, information, services, or technologies in the view of increasing the industrial system’s circularity. Despite the benefits brought by IS, though, barriers hindering the full dissemination of IS remain. This paper presents a methodology developed in the framework of the H2020 European project EPOS that aims at removing some of the obstacles to the implementation of IS. The method follows a multidisciplinary approach that intents to trigger the interest of industry decision-makers and initiate efforts to optimise the use of energy and material resources through symbiosis. It is applied to an industrial cluster located in the Humber region of UK. The case study shows how the approach helped to identify several IS opportunities, how one particular high-potential symbiosis was further assessed, and how it led to the creation of a business case. It was estimated that the identified symbiosis could bring substantial economic (+2000 k€ pa), environmental (−4000 t of CO 2 eq. pa) and social (+7 years of healthy life) gains to the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Hélène Cervo & Stéphane Ogé & Amtul Samie Maqbool & Francisco Mendez Alva & Lindsay Lessard & Alexandre Bredimas & Jean-Henry Ferrasse & Greet Van Eetvelde, 2019. "A Case Study of Industrial Symbiosis in the Humber Region Using the EPOS Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6940-:d:294602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Rachel Lombardi & Peter Laybourn, 2012. "Redefining Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 28-37, February.
    2. Alexandra S Penn & Christopher J K Knight & David J B Lloyd & Daniele Avitabile & Kasper Kok & Frank Schiller & Amy Woodward & Angela Druckman & Lauren Basson, 2013. "Participatory Development and Analysis of a Fuzzy Cognitive Map of the Establishment of a Bio-Based Economy in the Humber Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Marian Chertow & John Ehrenfeld, 2012. "Organizing Self‐Organizing Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 13-27, February.
    4. Bernard Dussuc & Sébastien Geindre, 2012. "Capital social, théorie des réseaux sociaux et recherche en PME : une revue de la littérature," Post-Print halshs-00747912, HAL.
    5. Pauline Deutz & David Gibbs, 2008. "Industrial Ecology and Regional Development: Eco-Industrial Development as Cluster Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1313-1328.
    6. Aurélien Bruel & Jakub Kronenberg & Nadège Troussier & Bertrand Guillaume, 2019. "Linking Industrial Ecology and Ecological Economics: A Theoretical and Empirical Foundation for the Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 12-21, February.
    7. Weslynne S. Ashton & Shauhrat S. Chopra & And Rahul Kashyap, 2017. "Life and Death of Industrial Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Zhiquan Yeo & Donato Masi & Jonathan Sze Choong Low & Yen Ting Ng & Puay Siew Tan & Stuart Barnes, 2019. "Tools for promoting industrial symbiosis: A systematic review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1087-1108, October.
    9. Rachel Lombardi, 2017. "Non-technical barriers to (and drivers for) the circular economy through industrial symbiosis: A practical input," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1-2), pages 171-189.
    10. Tudor, Terry & Adam, Emma & Bates, Margaret, 2007. "Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 199-207, March.
    11. Pauline Deutz & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2015. "From Theory to Practice: Enhancing the Potential Policy Impact of Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Alan Murray & Keith Skene & Kathryn Haynes, 2017. "The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 369-380, February.
    13. Pierre Desrochers & Joanna Szurmak, 2017. "Long Distance Trade, Locational Dynamics and By-Product Development: Insights from the History of the American Cottonseed Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Guido Capelleveen & Chintan Amrit & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2018. "A Literature Survey of Information Systems Facilitating the Identification of Industrial Symbiosis," Progress in IS, in: Benoît Otjacques & Patrik Hitzelberger & Stefan Naumann & Volker Wohlgemuth (ed.), From Science to Society, pages 155-169, Springer.
    15. Shafer, Scott M. & Smith, H. Jeff & Linder, Jane C., 2005. "The power of business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 199-207.
    16. Gabriel B. Grant & Thomas P. Seager & Guillaume Massard & Loring Nies, 2010. "Information and Communication Technology for Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(5), pages 740-753, October.
    17. Thomas Magnusson & Hans Andersson & Mikael Ottosson, 2019. "Industrial ecology and the boundaries of the manufacturing firm," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1211-1225, October.
    18. Ioannis Siskos & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2017. "Synergy Management Services Companies: A New Business Model for Industrial Park Operators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(4), pages 802-814, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Kulakovskaya & C. Knoeri & F. Radke & N. U. Blum, 2023. "Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    2. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Arash Najmaei & Zahra Sadeghinejad, 2023. "Green and sustainable business models: historical roots, growth trajectory, conceptual architecture and an agenda for future research—A bibliometric review of green and sustainable business models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 957-999, February.
    4. Aurélien Bruel & Radu Godina, 2023. "A Smart Contract Architecture Framework for Successful Industrial Symbiosis Applications Using Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel A. Artacho-Ramírez & Bélgica Pacheco-Blanco & Víctor A. Cloquell-Ballester & Mónica Vicent & Irina Celades, 2020. "Quick Wins Workshop and Companies Profiling to Analyze Industrial Symbiosis Potential. Valenciaport’s Cluster as Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Fraccascia, Luca & Yazan, Devrim Murat & Albino, Vito & Zijm, Henk, 2020. "The role of redundancy in industrial symbiotic business development: A theoretical framework explored by agent-based simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    4. Andrea Cecchin & Roberta Salomone & Pauline Deutz & Andrea Raggi & Laura Cutaia, 2021. "What Is in a Name? The Rising Star of the Circular Economy as a Resource-Related Concept for Sustainable Development," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    5. Fraccascia, Luca, 2020. "Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Amtul Samie Maqbool & Francisco Mendez Alva & Greet Van Eetvelde, 2018. "An Assessment of European Information Technology Tools to Support Industrial Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Fraccascia, Luca, 2019. "The impact of technical and economic disruptions in industrial symbiosis relationships: An enterprise input-output approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 161-174.
    9. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Andreas Schmiegelow & Maj Munch Andersen, 2018. "Measuring the Readiness of SMEs for Eco-Innovation and Industrial Symbiosis: Development of a Screening Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Rachelle LeBlanc & Carole Tranchant & Yves Gagnon & Raymond Côté, 2016. "Potential for Eco-Industrial Park Development in Moncton, New Brunswick (Canada): A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. João Azevedo & Inês Ferreira & Rui Dias & Cristina Ascenço & Bruno Magalhães & Juan Henriques & Muriel Iten & Fernando Cunha, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis Implementation Potential—An Applied Assessment Tool for Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Daniel Jato-Espino & Carmen Ruiz-Puente, 2020. "Fostering Circular Economy Through the Analysis of Existing Open Access Industrial Symbiosis Databases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Sergio Barile & Clara Bassano & Raffaele D’Amore & Paolo Piciocchi & Marialuisa Saviano & Pietro Vito, 2021. "Insights of Digital Transformation Processes in Industrial Symbiosis from the Viable Systems Approach ( vSa )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Lucyna Łȩkawska-Andrinopoulou & Georgios Tsimiklis & Sarah Leick & Manuel Moreno Nicolás & Angelos Amditis, 2021. "Circular Economy Matchmaking Framework for Future Marketplace Deployment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Haiyan Shan & Junliang Yang & Guo Wei, 2019. "Industrial Symbiosis Systems: Promoting Carbon Emission Reduction Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Vanessa Prieto‐Sandoval & Marta Ormazabal & Carmen Jaca & Elisabeth Viles, 2018. "Key elements in assessing circular economy implementation in small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1525-1534, December.
    19. Chris Davis & Graham Aid, 2022. "Machine learning‐assisted industrial symbiosis: Testing the ability of word vectors to estimate similarity for material substitutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 27-43, February.
    20. Fraccascia, Luca & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Albino, Vito, 2021. "Ecosystem indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6940-:d:294602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.