IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3634-d244959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Neighborhood Search Algorithm Based on Decomposition for Multi-Objective Minimum Weighted Vertex Cover Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Shuli Hu

    (School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Xiaoli Wu

    (School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Huan Liu

    (School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Yiyuan Wang

    (School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Ruizhi Li

    (School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Minghao Yin

    (School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China
    Key Laboratory of Applied Statistics of MOE, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

The multi-objective minimum weighted vertex cover problem aims to minimize the sum of different single type weights simultaneously. In this paper, we focus on the bi-objective minimum weighted vertex cover and propose a multi-objective algorithm integrating iterated neighborhood search with decomposition technique to solve this problem. Initially, we adopt the decomposition method to divide the multi-objective problem into several scalar optimization sub-problems. Meanwhile, to find more possible optimal solutions, we design a mixed score function according to the problem feature, which is applied in initializing procedure and neighborhood search. During the neighborhood search, three operators ( A d d , D e l e t e , S w a p ) explore the search space effectively. We performed numerical experiments on many instances, and the results show the effectiveness of our new algorithm (combining decomposition and neighborhood search with mixed score) on several experimental metrics. We compared our experimental results with the classical multi-objective algorithm non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II. It was obviously shown that our algorithm can provide much better results than the comparative algorithm considering the different metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuli Hu & Xiaoli Wu & Huan Liu & Yiyuan Wang & Ruizhi Li & Minghao Yin, 2019. "Multi-Objective Neighborhood Search Algorithm Based on Decomposition for Multi-Objective Minimum Weighted Vertex Cover Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3634-:d:244959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3634/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3634/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alikar, Najmeh & Mousavi, Seyed Mohsen & Raja Ghazilla, Raja Ariffin & Tavana, Madjid & Olugu, Ezutah Udoncy, 2017. "Application of the NSGA-II algorithm to a multi-period inventory-redundancy allocation problem in a series-parallel system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Gerald W. Evans, 1984. "An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multiobjective Mathematical Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(11), pages 1268-1282, November.
    3. Shyong Shyu & Peng-Yeng Yin & Bertrand Lin, 2004. "An Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for the Minimum Weight Vertex Cover Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 283-304, October.
    4. Elliot R. Lieberman, 1991. "Soviet Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming Methods: An Overview," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(9), pages 1147-1165, September.
    5. Limin Wang & Wenxue Du & Zhao Zhang & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2017. "A PTAS for minimum weighted connected vertex cover $$P_3$$ P 3 problem in 3-dimensional wireless sensor networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 106-122, January.
    6. Rollon Emma & Larrosa Javier, 2009. "Constraint Optimization Techniques for Exact Multi-Objective Optimization," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Vincent Barichard & Matthias Ehrgott & Xavier Gandibleux & Vincent T'Kindt (ed.), Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming, pages 89-98, Springer.
    7. Mauricio G.C. Resende & Celso C. Ribeiro, 2010. "Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedures: Advances, Hybridizations, and Applications," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michel Gendreau & Jean-Yves Potvin (ed.), Handbook of Metaheuristics, chapter 0, pages 283-319, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raka Jovanovic & Antonio P. Sanfilippo & Stefan Voß, 2022. "Fixed set search applied to the multi-objective minimum weighted vertex cover problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 481-508, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raka Jovanovic & Antonio P. Sanfilippo & Stefan Voß, 2022. "Fixed set search applied to the multi-objective minimum weighted vertex cover problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 481-508, August.
    2. Musmanno, Leonardo M. & Ribeiro, Celso C., 2016. "Heuristics for the generalized median graph problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 371-384.
    3. Zaretalab, Arash & Sharifi, Mani & Guilani, Pedram Pourkarim & Taghipour, Sharareh & Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan, 2022. "A multi-objective model for optimizing the redundancy allocation, component supplier selection, and reliable activities for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Daniel P. Loucks & László Somlyódy, 1986. "Multiobjective Assessment of Multipurpose Water Resources Projects for Developing Countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75, February.
    5. Aouni, Belaid & Kettani, Ossama, 2001. "Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 225-231, January.
    6. H. P. Benson & E. Sun, 2000. "Outcome Space Partition of the Weight Set in Multiobjective Linear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 17-36, April.
    7. Kalu, Timothy Ch. U., 1999. "Capital budgeting under uncertainty: An extended goal programming approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 235-251, January.
    8. Juan, Yi-Kai & Castro, Daniel & Roper, Kathy, 2010. "Decision support approach based on multiple objectives and resources for assessing the relocation plan of dangerous hillside aggregations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 265-272, April.
    9. Angel Juan & Javier Faulin & Albert Ferrer & Helena Lourenço & Barry Barrios, 2013. "MIRHA: multi-start biased randomization of heuristics with adaptive local search for solving non-smooth routing problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 109-132, April.
    10. Yasemin Aksoy, 1990. "An interactive branch‐and‐bound algorithm for bicriterion nonconvex/mixed integer programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 403-417, June.
    11. Wan S. Shin & Diane Breivik Allen, 1994. "An interactive paired comparison method for bicriterion integer programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 423-434, April.
    12. Luzhi Wang & Shuli Hu & Mingyang Li & Junping Zhou, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for Minimum Vertex Cover Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-8, July.
    13. Victor Reyes & Ignacio Araya, 2021. "A GRASP-based scheme for the set covering problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2391-2408, December.
    14. Pedro Pinacho-Davidson & Christian Blum, 2020. "Barrakuda : A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Minimum Capacitated Dominating Set Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    16. Hemmat Esfe, Mohammad & Sadati Tilebon, Seyyed Mohamad, 2020. "Statistical and artificial based optimization on thermo-physical properties of an oil based hybrid nanofluid using NSGA-II and RSM," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    17. Luciano Ferreira Cruz & Flavia Bernardo Pinto & Lucas Camilotti & Angelo Marcio Oliveira Santanna & Roberto Zanetti Freire & Leandro Santos Coelho, 2022. "Improved multiobjective differential evolution with spherical pruning algorithm for optimizing 3D printing technology parametrization process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1565-1587, December.
    18. Jean C. Bedard & Babu R. Gopi & B. Vijayalakshmi, 1991. "A multiple criteria model for audit planning decisions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 293-308, September.
    19. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Rima Tamošiūnienė, 2016. "Sustainability-Oriented Financial Resource Allocation in a Project Portfolio through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Nath, Rahul & Muhuri, Pranab K., 2022. "Evolutionary Optimization based Solution approaches for Many Objective Reliability-Redundancy Allocation Problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3634-:d:244959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.