IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v37y1990i3p403-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interactive branch‐and‐bound algorithm for bicriterion nonconvex/mixed integer programming

Author

Listed:
  • Yasemin Aksoy

Abstract

Although there has been extensive research on interactive multiple objective decision making in the last two decades, there is still a need for specialized interactive algorithms that exploit the relatively simple structure of bicriterion programming problems. This article develops an interactive branch‐and‐bound algorithm for bicriterion nonconvex programming problems. The algorithm searches among only the set of nondominated solutions since one of them is a most preferred solution that maximizes the overall value function of the decision maker over the set of achievable solutions. The interactive branch‐and‐bound algorithm requires only pairwise preference comparisons from the decision maker. Based on the decision maker's responses, the algorithm reduces the set of nondominated solutions and terminates with his most preferred nondominated solution. Branching corresponds to dividing the subset of nondominated solutions considered at a node into two subsets. The incumbent solution is updated based on the preference of the decision maker between two nondominated solutions. Fathoming decisions are based on the decision maker's preference between the incumbent solution and the ideal solution of the node in consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasemin Aksoy, 1990. "An interactive branch‐and‐bound algorithm for bicriterion nonconvex/mixed integer programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 403-417, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:3:p:403-417
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800370305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800370305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800370305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walker, John, 1978. "An interactive method as an aid in solving multi-objective mathematical programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(5), pages 341-349, September.
    2. Gerald W. Evans, 1984. "An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multiobjective Mathematical Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(11), pages 1268-1282, November.
    3. Harold P. Benson & Thomas L. Morin, 1987. "A Bicriteria Mathematical Programming Model for Nutrition Planning in Developing Nations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(12), pages 1593-1601, December.
    4. Mary W. Cooper, 1981. "A Survey of Methods for Pure Nonlinear Integer Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 353-361, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan S. Shin & Diane Breivik Allen, 1994. "An interactive paired comparison method for bicriterion integer programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 423-434, April.
    2. Rui Chen & Xinglu Liu & Lixin Miao & Peng Yang, 2020. "Electric Vehicle Tour Planning Considering Range Anxiety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Ted Ralphs & Matthew Saltzman & Margaret Wiecek, 2006. "An improved algorithm for solving biobjective integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 43-70, October.
    4. Ching‐Jong Liao & Cheng‐Hsing Chuang, 1996. "Sequencing with setup time and order tardiness trade‐offs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(7), pages 971-984, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harold P. Benson & Serpil Sayin, 1997. "Towards finding global representations of the efficient set in multiple objective mathematical programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 47-67, February.
    2. Kaliszewski, Ignacy & Michalowski, Wojtek, 1999. "Searching for psychologically stable solutions of multiple criteria decision problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 549-562, November.
    3. Francisco J. André & Laura Riesgo, 2006. "A Duality Procedure to Elicit Nonlinear Multiattribute Utility Functions," Working Papers 06.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    4. Daniel P. Loucks & László Somlyódy, 1986. "Multiobjective Assessment of Multipurpose Water Resources Projects for Developing Countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75, February.
    5. Alves, Maria Joao & Climaco, Joao, 1999. "Using cutting planes in an interactive reference point approach for multiobjective integer linear programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 565-577, September.
    6. Aouni, Belaid & Kettani, Ossama, 2001. "Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 225-231, January.
    7. H. P. Benson & E. Sun, 2000. "Outcome Space Partition of the Weight Set in Multiobjective Linear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 17-36, April.
    8. Kalu, Timothy Ch. U., 1999. "Capital budgeting under uncertainty: An extended goal programming approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 235-251, January.
    9. Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
    10. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Kalu, Timothy Ch. U., 1998. "Domestic petroleum-related expertise utilization and Nigeria's oil industry survival: A multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 457-473, November.
    12. Vetschera, Rudolf, 1992. "Estimating preference cones from discrete choices: Computational techniques and experiences," Discussion Papers, Series I 259, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    13. Sarathy, Rathindra & Shetty, Bala & Sen, Arun, 1997. "A constrained nonlinear 0-1 program for data allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(3), pages 626-647, November.
    14. Reiner Horst, 1990. "Deterministic methods in constrained global optimization: Some recent advances and new fields of application," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 433-471, August.
    15. Gass, Saul I. & Roy, Pallabi Guha, 2003. "The compromise hypersphere for multiobjective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 459-479, February.
    16. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    17. Wan S. Shin & Diane Breivik Allen, 1994. "An interactive paired comparison method for bicriterion integer programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 423-434, April.
    18. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Ross, Anthony & Shetty, Bala, 1999. "Nonlinear integer programming for optimal allocation in stratified sampling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 667-680, August.
    19. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    20. André, Francisco J. & Cardenete, M. Alejandro, 2009. "Defining efficient policies in a general equilibrium model: a multi-objective approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 192-200, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:3:p:403-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.