IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p2979-d165032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Recycling Fees and Subsidies in China’s WEEE Disposal Fund with Formal and Informal Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Huihui Liu

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Xiaolin Wu

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Desheng Dou

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Xu Tang

    (School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • G. Keong Leong

    (College of Business Administration and Public Policy, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA)

Abstract

At present, most of China’s waste electrical and electronic equipment (hereafter referred to as WEEE) flow into the informal recycling sector, which has no official disassembly certification. To regulate the WEEE recycling industry, the policy of the WEEE disposal fund has been implemented to levy recycling fees from producers and subsidize the formal recycling sector. This paper aims to solve the challenging problem of how to optimize recycling fees and subsidies. We first study the competition between the formal and informal sectors, and construct the game models of the dismantling and refurbishing processes. Based on the equilibrium outcomes, we then examine the impact of the disposal fund on producers, as well as the formal and informal recycling sectors. With the goal of maximizing social welfare and maintaining a balanced budget for the disposal fund, we study the optimal recycling fee levied on producers and the corresponding subsidy provided to the formal sector. Social welfare is a function of producer and formal-recycler profits, consumer surplus, and the negative externality caused by informal dismantling and refurbishing, such as environmental pollution and safety problems. Results show that the use of subsidy can increase the acquisition quantity of used products in the formal sector, but the increase will slow down with higher subsidy. If the recycling fee that producers are charged is small, social welfare will be improved. In addition, as the fee is increased, social welfare will rise first and then fall. As such, any excessive increase in recycling fees should be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Huihui Liu & Xiaolin Wu & Desheng Dou & Xu Tang & G. Keong Leong, 2018. "Determining Recycling Fees and Subsidies in China’s WEEE Disposal Fund with Formal and Informal Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:2979-:d:165032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/2979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/2979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Huihui & Lei, Ming & Deng, Honghui & Keong Leong, G. & Huang, Tao, 2016. "A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 290-302.
    2. Jian Cao & Jiayang Xu & Hui Wang & Xuemei Zhang & Xihui Chen & Yunwen Zhao & Xiaoli Yang & Gengui Zhou & Jerald L. Schnoor, 2018. "Innovating Collection Modes for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-33, May.
    3. Zhen-Zheng Zhang & Zong-Jun Wang & Li-Wen Liu, 2015. "Retail Services and Pricing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Tong Shu & Yongjian Wang & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Decisions on Remanufacturing with WTP Disparity and Recycling Competition under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Kangzhou Wang & Yingxue Zhao & Yonghong Cheng & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2014. "Cooperation or Competition? Channel Choice for a Remanufacturing Fashion Supply Chain with Government Subsidy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Xiangyun Chang & Junjie Fan & Yabing Zhao & Jie Wu, 2016. "Impact of China’s Recycling Subsidy Policy in the Product Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Renzheng Xue & Fengbin Zhang & Feng Tian & Richard Oloruntoba & Shidi Miao, 2018. "Dual Chains Competition under Two Recycling Modes Based on System Dynamics Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    9. Qianwang Deng & Xiahui Liu & Haolan Liao, 2015. "Identifying Critical Factors in the Eco-Efficiency of Remanufacturing Based on the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2014. "Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 460-471.
    11. Bansal, Sangeeta & Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis, 2003. "Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 333-355, March.
    12. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    13. Ferrer, Geraldo & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2010. "Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 370-379, June.
    14. Besiou, Maria & Georgiadis, Patroklos & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2012. "Official recycling and scavengers: Symbiotic or conflicting?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 563-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miaomei Guo & Weilun Huang, 2023. "Consumer Willingness to Recycle The Wasted Batteries of Electric Vehicles in the Era of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Horațiu Vermeșan & Ancuța-Elena Tiuc & Marius Purcar, 2019. "Advanced Recovery Techniques for Waste Materials from IT and Telecommunication Equipment Printed Circuit Boards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Xiao-Shan Yang & Xiao-Xue Zheng & Tian-Yu Zhang & Ying Du & Fengru Long, 2021. "Waste Electrical and Electronic Fund Policy: Current Status and Evaluation of Implementation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Tingting Liu & Qian Zhang & Zichen Zheng & Shangyun Wu & Zhixiong Weng, 2022. "Stakeholder Analysis of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Internet Recycling Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov & Mladen Krstić & Dejan Spasić, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability: The Case of Waste Recycling Projects in the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Hilal Shams & Altaf Hossain Molla & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin & Zambri Harun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Specific Research Themes on E-Waste: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Qiang Xiao & Hongshuang Wang, 2022. "Prediction of WEEE Recycling in China Based on an Improved Grey Prediction Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.
    2. Huihui Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Hui Ding & G. Keong Leong, 2017. "Optimal Remanufacturing Certification Contracts in the Electrical and Electronic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Shizhen Bai & Ling Ge & Xuelian Zhang, 2022. "Platform or direct channel: government-subsidized recycling strategies for WEEE," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 347-369, June.
    5. Liu, Huihui & Lei, Ming & Deng, Honghui & Keong Leong, G. & Huang, Tao, 2016. "A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 290-302.
    6. Mohammed Alkahtani & Aiman Ziout & Bashir Salah & Moath Alatefi & Abd Elatty E. Abd Elgawad & Ahmed Badwelan & Umar Syarif, 2021. "An Insight into Reverse Logistics with a Focus on Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    8. Ze-Bin Wang & Yao-Yu Wang & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Optimal distribution channel strategy for new and remanufactured products," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 269-295, June.
    9. Dongxue Guo & Yi He & Yuanyuan Wu & Qingyun Xu, 2016. "Analysis of Supply Chain under Different Subsidy Policies of the Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. He, Peng & He, Yong & Xu, Henry, 2019. "Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 108-123.
    12. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Kangzhou Wang & Yingxue Zhao & Yonghong Cheng & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2014. "Cooperation or Competition? Channel Choice for a Remanufacturing Fashion Supply Chain with Government Subsidy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Xiaohua Han & Ying Shen & Yiwen Bian, 2020. "Optimal recovery strategy of manufacturers: Remanufacturing products or recycling materials?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 463-489, July.
    15. Jiaru Bai & Shu Hu & Luyi Gui & Kut C. So & Zu‐Jun Ma, 2021. "Optimal Subsidy Schemes and Budget Allocations for Government‐Subsidized Trade‐in Programs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2689-2706, August.
    16. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    17. Qian-wang Deng & Hao-lan Liao & Bo-wen Xu & Xia-hui Liu, 2017. "The Resource Benefits Evaluation Model on Remanufacturing Processes of End-of-Life Construction Machinery under the Uncertainty in Recycling Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    19. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:2979-:d:165032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.