IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p256-d90087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Resource Benefits Evaluation Model on Remanufacturing Processes of End-of-Life Construction Machinery under the Uncertainty in Recycling Price

Author

Listed:
  • Qian-wang Deng

    (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Hao-lan Liao

    (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Bo-wen Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Xia-hui Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

Abstract

In the process of end-of-life construction machinery remanufacturing, the existence of uncertainties in all aspects of the remanufacturing process increase the difficulty and complexity of resource benefits evaluation for them. To quantify the effects of those uncertainty factors, this paper makes a mathematical analysis of the recycling and remanufacturing processes, building a resource benefits evaluation model for the end-of-life construction machinery. The recycling price and the profits of remanufacturers can thereby be obtained with a maximum remanufacturing resource benefit. The study investigates the change regularity of the resource benefits, recycling price, and profits of remanufacturers when the recycling price, quality fluctuation coefficient, demand coefficient, and the reusing ratio of products or parts are varying. In the numerical experiment, we explore the effects of uncertainties on the remanufacturing decisions and the total expected costs. The simulated analysis shows when the quality fluctuation coefficient is approaching to 1, the values of the profits of remanufacturer, the maximal resource benefits and recycling price grade into constants.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian-wang Deng & Hao-lan Liao & Bo-wen Xu & Xia-hui Liu, 2017. "The Resource Benefits Evaluation Model on Remanufacturing Processes of End-of-Life Construction Machinery under the Uncertainty in Recycling Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:256-:d:90087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Geyer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Atalay Atasu, 2007. "The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 88-100, January.
    2. Ferrer, Geraldo & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2010. "Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 370-379, June.
    3. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2015. "Reprint of “Supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 94-108.
    4. Hamidreza Zahedi & Christian Mascle & Pierre Baptiste, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation model to measure the disassembly difficulty; application of the semi-destructive methods in aviation End-of-Life," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3736-3748, June.
    5. Kai Meng & Peihuang Lou & Xianghui Peng & Victor Prybutok, 2016. "An improved co-evolutionary algorithm for green manufacturing by integration of recovery option selection and disassembly planning for end-of-life products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5567-5593, September.
    6. Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2014. "Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 460-471.
    7. Sabharwal, Srishti & Garg, Suresh, 2013. "Determining cost effectiveness index of remanufacturing: A graph theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 521-532.
    8. Qianwang Deng & Xiahui Liu & Haolan Liao, 2015. "Identifying Critical Factors in the Eco-Efficiency of Remanufacturing Based on the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Teunter, Ruud H. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P., 2011. "Optimal core acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain core quality fractions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 241-248, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Duan & Hengli Cao & Desheng Xu, 2023. "Research on the Impact of New Parts Price Increase on the Stability of Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Qingshan Gong & Yurong Xiong & Zhigang Jiang & Xugang Zhang & Mingmao Hu & Zhanlong Cao, 2022. "Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits Analysis of Remanufacturing Strategies for Used Products," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2015. "Strategic and operational decisions under sales competition and collection competition for end-of-use products in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-20.
    2. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    3. Huihui Liu & Xiaolin Wu & Desheng Dou & Xu Tang & G. Keong Leong, 2018. "Determining Recycling Fees and Subsidies in China’s WEEE Disposal Fund with Formal and Informal Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Rafael Diaz & Erika Marsillac, 2017. "Evaluating strategic remanufacturing supply chain decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 2522-2539, May.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    6. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Li, Lu, 2023. "Optimal procurement strategy for multi-echelon remanufacturing systems under quality uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Mohsen Zamani & Mahdi Abolghasemi & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2019. "Considering pricing and uncertainty in designing a reverse logistics network," Papers 1909.11633, arXiv.org.
    8. Gernot Lechner & Marc Reimann, 2013. "The effect of active used product acquisition on manufacturing and remanufacturing strategies," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2013-01, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    9. Zhu, Xiaoxi & Wang, Miaomiao & Chen, Guofu & Chen, Xiaoshan, 2016. "The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 856-868.
    10. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    11. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    12. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
    13. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2017. "Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 120-132.
    15. Matsui, Kenji, 2022. "Optimal timing of acquisition price announcement for used products in a dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 615-632.
    16. Chen, Wenyi & Kucukyazici, Beste & Verter, Vedat & Jesús Sáenz, María, 2015. "Supply chain design for unlocking the value of remanufacturing under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 804-819.
    17. Xue, Dongmei & Teunter, Ruud H. & Zhu, Stuart X. & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Entering the high-end market by collecting and remanufacturing a competitor’s high-end cores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Hong, Xianpei & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Wang, Wenjuan, 2015. "Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 12-22.
    19. Wang, Nengmin & He, Qidong & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 246-258.
    20. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:256-:d:90087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.