IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p751-d135460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Strategic Inclinations of Japanese Environmental NPOs in Post-Fukushima Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Heuer

    (Sigmund Weis School of Business, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870, USA)

  • Shan Yan

    (Sigmund Weis School of Business, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870, USA)

Abstract

Following Sine and David’s research on the potential of environmental jolts shifting the status quo in U.S. energy policy, we focus on the potential for environmental non-profit organizations in Japan to shift the status quo through institutional entrepreneurial efforts following the environmental jolt from the Fukushima nuclear power catastrophe. We evaluate the institutionalization of energy policy in Japan both pre- and post-Fukushima as the context for examining the potential for change in Japan’s energy policy. We utilize mixed qualitative and quantitative research methods to evaluate the attitudes and strategic inclinations of privately funded Japanese environmental non-profit organizations. Following Dreiling and Wolf’s model of material–organizational dependencies versus ideological motivations of non-profit organizations, we develop a typology to identify which, if any, segments of environmental Japanese non-profit organizations might pursue institutional entrepreneurial (Levy and Scully) opportunities in support of renewable energy policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Heuer & Shan Yan, 2018. "Exploring the Strategic Inclinations of Japanese Environmental NPOs in Post-Fukushima Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:751-:d:135460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sine, Wesley D. & David, Robert J., 2003. "Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 185-207, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunjia Hu & Haili Zhang & Michael Song & Dapeng Liang, 2019. "Past Performance, Organizational Aspiration, and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Jolts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Zahra Gorjian Khanzad & Ali A. Gooyabadi, 2021. "Development of Strategic Resilience Framework for Small Businesses Post-COVID-19," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    2. Jones, Raymond J. & Barnir, Anat, 2019. "Properties of opportunity creation and discovery: Comparing variation in contexts of innovativeness," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Jiyoung Kimjeon & Per Davidsson, 2022. "External Enablers of Entrepreneurship: A Review and Agenda for Accumulation of Strategically Actionable Knowledge," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 643-687, May.
    4. Fahian Anisul Huq & Mark Stevenson, 2020. "Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 415-442, January.
    5. Kejia Yang & Johan Schot & Bernhard Truffer, 2020. "Shaping the Directionality of Sustainability Transitions: The Diverging Development Patterns of Solar PV in Two Chinese Provinces," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-14, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    6. Kathryn L. Heinze & Klaus Weber, 2016. "Toward Organizational Pluralism: Institutional Intrapreneurship in Integrative Medicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 157-172, February.
    7. Goll Irene & Rasheed Abdul A., 2011. "Environmental Jolts, Clocks, and Strategic Change in the U.S. Airline Industry: The Effects of Deregulation and the 9/11/2001 Terrorist Attacks," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-37, December.
    8. Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Entrepreneurial alertness toward responsible research and innovation: Digital technology makes the psychological heart of entrepreneurship pound," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Mountford, Nicola & Geiger, Susi, 2024. "Public actor roles in market experiments: Innovating digital health markets in New York and Ireland," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Jennifer L. Woolley, 2014. "The Creation and Configuration of Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship in Emerging Domains of Activity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(4), pages 721-747, July.
    11. Weiqi Dai & Mingqing Liao & Qiao Lin & Jincai Dong, 2022. "Does entrepreneurs’ proactive attention to government policies matter?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 396-431, July.
    12. Robert N. Eberhart & Charles E. Eesley & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2017. "Failure Is an Option: Institutional Change, Entrepreneurial Risk, and New Firm Growth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 93-112, February.
    13. Daniel Engler & Gino Cattani & Joe Porac, 2020. "Studying the Incubation of a New Product Market Through Realized and Alternative Histories," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 160-192, September.
    14. Manisaligil, Alperen & Gölgeci, İsmail & Bakker, Arnold B. & Faruk Aysan, Ahmet & Babacan, Mehmet & Gür, Nurullah, 2023. "Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Xiaojun Du & Fei Feng & Wei Lv, 2022. "Bibliometric Overview of Organizational Legitimacy Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Poisson-de Haro, Serge & Bitektine, Alex, 2015. "Global sustainability pressures and strategic choice: The role of firms’ structures and non-market capabilities in selection and implementation of sustainability initiatives," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 326-341.
    17. Arild Aspelund & Mohammad Javadinia Azari & Andreas Flåt Aglen & Sondre Gullord Graff, 2018. "The birth and development of a born global industry: The case of microelectronics in Norway," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 82-108, March.
    18. Pamela S. Tolbert & Robert J. David & Wesley D. Sine, 2011. "Studying Choice and Change: The Intersection of Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1332-1344, October.
    19. Smink, Magda & Negro, Simona O. & Niesten, Eva & Hekkert, Marko P., 2015. "How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 225-237.
    20. João Leitão & João Capucho, 2021. "Institutional, Economic, and Socio-Economic Determinants of the Entrepreneurial Activity of Nations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:751-:d:135460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.