IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v5y2015i2p460-491d49738.html

The Development of a Self-Report Questionnaire on Coping with Cyberbullying: The Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Niels C.L. Jacobs

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Trijntje Völlink

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Francine Dehue

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Lilian Lechner

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The negative effects and the continuation of cyberbullying seem to depend on the coping strategies the victims use. To assess their coping strategies, self-report questionnaires (SRQs) are used. However, these SRQs are often subject to several shortcomings: the (single and topological) categorizations used in SRQs do not always adequately differentiate among various coping responses, in addition the strategies of general SRQs fail to accurately measure coping with cyberbullying. This study is therefore aimed to develop a SRQ that specifically measures coping with cyberbullying ( i.e. , Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire; CCQ) and to discover whether other, not single and topological, categorizations of coping strategies can be found. Based on previous SRQs used in the (cyber)bullying ( i.e. , traditional and cyberbullying) literature ( i.e. , 49 studies were found with three different SRQs measuring coping with traditional bullying, cyberbullying or (cyber)bullying) items and categorizations were selected, compared and merged into a new questionnaire. In compliance with recommendations from the classical test-theory, a principal component analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were done, and a final model was constructed. Seventeen items loaded onto four different coping categorizations: mental-, passive-, social-, and confrontational-coping. The CCQ appeared to have good internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability, good discriminant validity and the development of the CCQ fulfilled many of the recommendations from classical test-theory. The CCQ omits working in single and topological categorizations and measures cognitive, behavioral, approach and avoidance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels C.L. Jacobs & Trijntje Völlink & Francine Dehue & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "The Development of a Self-Report Questionnaire on Coping with Cyberbullying: The Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:460-491:d:49738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels C.L. Jacobs & Linda Goossens & Francine Dehue & Trijntje Völlink & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "Dutch Cyberbullying Victims’ Experiences, Perceptions, Attitudes and Motivations Related to (Coping with) Cyberbullying: Focus Group Interviews," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Schneider, S.K. & O'donnell, L. & Stueve, A. & Coulter, R.W.S., 2012. "Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(1), pages 171-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Serim & Chun, JongSerl, 2020. "Conceptualizing the impacts of cyberbullying victimization among Korean male adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Sung Seek Moon & Heeyoung Kim & Kristen Seay & Eusebius Small & Youn Kyoung Kim, 2016. "Ecological Factors of Being Bullied Among Adolescents: a Classification and Regression Tree Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(3), pages 743-756, September.
    3. Silvia Gabrielli & Silvia Rizzi & Sara Carbone & Enrico Maria Piras, 2021. "School Interventions for Bullying–Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Brigita Mieziene & Arunas Emeljanovas & Vida Janina Cesnaitiene & Daiva Vizbaraite & Renata Zumbakyte-Sermuksniene, 2020. "Health Behaviors and Psychological Distress Among Conscripts of the Lithuanian Military Service: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Eloy López-Meneses & Esteban Vázquez-Cano & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2020. "Socioeconomic Effects in Cyberbullying: Global Research Trends in the Educational Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-31, June.
    6. Chai, Lei & Xue, Jia & Han, Ziqiang, 2020. "School bullying victimization and self-rated health and life satisfaction: The gendered buffering effect of educational expectations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Elbedour, Salman & Alqahtani, Salihah & El Sheikh Rihan, Ibrahim & Bawalsah, Joseph A. & Booker-Ammah, Beverly & Turner, J. Fidel, 2020. "Cyberbullying: Roles of school psychologists and school counselors in addressing a pervasive social justice issue," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Rachel Brydolf-Horwitz, 2022. "Embodied and entangled: Slow violence and harm via digital technologies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 391-408, March.
    9. Kennedy, Reeve S., 2020. "Gender differences in outcomes of bullying prevention programs: A meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Xiongfei Cao & Ali Nawaz Khan & Ahsan Ali & Naseer Abbas Khan, 2020. "Consequences of Cyberbullying and Social Overload while Using SNSs: A Study of Users’ Discontinuous Usage Behavior in SNSs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1343-1356, December.
    11. Lynne Edwards & April Edwards Kontostathis & Christina Fisher, 2016. "Cyberbullying, Race/Ethnicity and Mental Health Outcomes: A Review of the Literature," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 71-78.
    12. Saleem, Sumera & Khan, Naurin Farooq & Zafar, Saad, 2021. "Prevalence of cyberbullying victimization among Pakistani Youth," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Matteo Angelo Fabris & Claudio Longobardi & Rosalba Morese & Davide Marengo, 2022. "Exploring Multivariate Profiles of Psychological Distress and Empathy in Early Adolescent Victims, Bullies, and Bystanders Involved in Cyberbullying Episodes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Sophie Evelyn & Elizabeth M. Clancy & Bianca Klettke & Ruth Tatnell, 2022. "A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Ljiljana Rakic & Milena Santric-Milicevic & Dejan Nikolic & Milena Vasic & Uros Babic & Jovana Todorovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Sanja Milenkovic, 2021. "The Relationship between Individual and Family Characteristics and Cyberbullying Exposure in a Nationally Representative Sample of School-Aged Children Living in Serbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Linlin Xie & Qingchen Da & Jingyu Huang & Zhekuan Peng & Liping Li, 2023. "A Cross-Sectional Survey of Different Types of School Bullying before and during COVID-19 in Shantou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Kabir Dasgupta, 2019. "Youth response to state cyberbullying laws," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 184-202, May.
    18. Jacek Pyżalski & Piotr Plichta & Anna Szuster & Julia Barlińska, 2022. "Cyberbullying Characteristics and Prevention—What Can We Learn from Narratives Provided by Adolescents and Their Teachers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Helfrich, Emily L. & Doty, Jennifer L. & Su, Yi-Wen & Yourell, Jacqlyn L. & Gabrielli, Joy, 2020. "Parental views on preventing and minimizing negative effects of cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Jolita Vveinhardt & Vilija Bite Fominiene & Regina Andriukaitiene & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Harassment and Bullying among Students in Higher Education Institutions: Manifestation of Single Cases of Harassment and Bullying in Aspects of Demographic Variables," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(51), pages 409-409.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:460-491:d:49738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.