IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v5y2015i1p43-64d44647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dutch Cyberbullying Victims’ Experiences, Perceptions, Attitudes and Motivations Related to (Coping with) Cyberbullying: Focus Group Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Niels C.L. Jacobs

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Linda Goossens

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Francine Dehue

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Trijntje Völlink

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Lilian Lechner

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, PO Box 2960, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Because of the negative effects of cyberbullying; and because of its unique characteristics; interventions to stop cyberbullying are needed. For this purpose, more insightful information is needed about cyberbullying victims’ ( i.e., the target group) experiences, perceptions, attitudes and motivations related to (coping with) cyberbullying. Five schools with 66 low-educated Dutch adolescents between 12 and 15 (53% female) participated in 10 focus group interviews. Results show that victims do not perceive all behaviors as cyberbullying and traditional bullying is generally perceived as worse than cyberbullying. Cyberbullies are perceived as sad, cowards and embarrassing themselves. Victims are perceived as easy targets; they wear strange clothes, act in a provocative manner and have a bad appearance. These perceptions often depend on context, the level of anonymity, being in a fight or not, the person sending the message and his/her behavior. Further, victims reacted to cyberbullying by acting nonchalant, by not actually saying anything and seeking help from others ( i.e. , parents are not often asked for help because they do not want to bother them; fear of restricted Internet privileges). It can be concluded that asking cyberbullying victims about their experiences in an open manner, and allowing them to discuss these experiences, likely results in new and insightful information compared to using self-reports. In this questioning the perception of adolescents is key to see what is perceived as cyberbullying.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels C.L. Jacobs & Linda Goossens & Francine Dehue & Trijntje Völlink & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "Dutch Cyberbullying Victims’ Experiences, Perceptions, Attitudes and Motivations Related to (Coping with) Cyberbullying: Focus Group Interviews," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:43-64:d:44647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/1/43/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/1/43/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mishna, Faye & Saini, Michael & Solomon, Steven, 2009. "Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1222-1228, December.
    2. Schneider, S.K. & O'donnell, L. & Stueve, A. & Coulter, R.W.S., 2012. "Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(1), pages 171-177.
    3. Hopkins, Lisa & Taylor, Laura & Bowen, Erica & Wood, Clare, 2013. "A qualitative study investigating adolescents' understanding of aggression, bullying and violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 685-693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ljiljana Rakic & Milena Santric-Milicevic & Dejan Nikolic & Milena Vasic & Uros Babic & Jovana Todorovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Sanja Milenkovic, 2021. "The Relationship between Individual and Family Characteristics and Cyberbullying Exposure in a Nationally Representative Sample of School-Aged Children Living in Serbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Niels C.L. Jacobs & Trijntje Völlink & Francine Dehue & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "The Development of a Self-Report Questionnaire on Coping with Cyberbullying: The Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Pabian, Sara & Erreygers, Sara & Vandebosch, Heidi & Van Royen, Kathleen & Dare, Julie & Costello, Leesa & Green, Lelia & Hawk, Dianne & Cross, Donna, 2018. "“Arguments online, but in school we always act normal”: The embeddedness of early adolescent negative peer interactions within the whole of their offline and online peer interactions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Lee, Serim & Chun, JongSerl, 2020. "Conceptualizing the impacts of cyberbullying victimization among Korean male adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Eloy López-Meneses & Esteban Vázquez-Cano & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2020. "Socioeconomic Effects in Cyberbullying: Global Research Trends in the Educational Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-31, June.
    6. Dennehy, Rebecca & Meaney, Sarah & Cronin, Mary & Arensman, Ella, 2020. "The psychosocial impacts of cybervictimisation and barriers to seeking social support: Young people’s perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Låftman, Sara Brolin & Modin, Bitte & Östberg, Viveca, 2013. "Cyberbullying and subjective health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-119.
    2. Mishna, Faye & Khoury-Kassabri, Mona & Schwan, Kaitlin & Wiener, Judith & Craig, Wendy & Beran, Tanya & Pepler, Debra & Daciuk, Joanne, 2016. "The contribution of social support to children and adolescents' self-perception: The mediating role of bullying victimization," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 120-127.
    3. Kim, Joonggon & Shim, Hee Sub & Hay, Carter, 2020. "Unpacking the dynamics involved in the impact of bullying victimization on adolescent suicidal ideation: Testing general strain theory in the Korean context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Shuhuan Zhou, 2021. "Status and Risk Factors of Chinese Teenagers’ Exposure to Cyberbullying," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    5. Mary Callaghan & Colette Kelly & Michal Molcho, 2015. "Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(2), pages 199-206, February.
    6. Eliot Simangunsong, 2020. "Cyberbullying: Identification Of Factors Affecting The Quality Of Higher Education In Indonesia," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 15-19, January.
    7. Sung Seek Moon & Heeyoung Kim & Kristen Seay & Eusebius Small & Youn Kyoung Kim, 2016. "Ecological Factors of Being Bullied Among Adolescents: a Classification and Regression Tree Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(3), pages 743-756, September.
    8. Niels C.L. Jacobs & Trijntje Völlink & Francine Dehue & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "The Development of a Self-Report Questionnaire on Coping with Cyberbullying: The Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, May.
    9. Silvia Gabrielli & Silvia Rizzi & Sara Carbone & Enrico Maria Piras, 2021. "School Interventions for Bullying–Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Sebastian Wachs & Juan Manuel Machimbarrena & Michelle F. Wright & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Soeun Yang & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskalou & , 2022. "Associations between Coping Strategies and Cyberhate Involvement: Evidence from Adolescents across Three World Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Rachel Brydolf-Horwitz, 2022. "Embodied and entangled: Slow violence and harm via digital technologies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 391-408, March.
    12. Saleem, Sumera & Khan, Naurin Farooq & Zafar, Saad, 2021. "Prevalence of cyberbullying victimization among Pakistani Youth," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Matteo Angelo Fabris & Claudio Longobardi & Rosalba Morese & Davide Marengo, 2022. "Exploring Multivariate Profiles of Psychological Distress and Empathy in Early Adolescent Victims, Bullies, and Bystanders Involved in Cyberbullying Episodes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1, August.
    14. Park, Sora & Na, Eun-Yeong & Kim, Eun-mee, 2014. "The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 74-81.
    15. Sophie Evelyn & Elizabeth M. Clancy & Bianca Klettke & Ruth Tatnell, 2022. "A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Kyung Im Kang & Kyonghwa Kang & Chanhee Kim, 2021. "Risk Factors Influencing Cyberbullying Perpetration among Middle School Students in Korea: Analysis Using the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Linlin Xie & Qingchen Da & Jingyu Huang & Zhekuan Peng & Liping Li, 2023. "A Cross-Sectional Survey of Different Types of School Bullying before and during COVID-19 in Shantou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    18. Kabir Dasgupta, 2019. "Youth response to state cyberbullying laws," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 184-202, May.
    19. Jacek Pyżalski & Piotr Plichta & Anna Szuster & Julia Barlińska, 2022. "Cyberbullying Characteristics and Prevention—What Can We Learn from Narratives Provided by Adolescents and Their Teachers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Ana María Martínez-Martínez & Remedios López-Liria & José Manuel Aguilar-Parra & Rubén Trigueros & María José Morales-Gázquez & Patricia Rocamora-Pérez, 2020. "Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Cybervictimization, and Academic Performance in Secondary School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:43-64:d:44647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.