IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i5p145-d942017.html

A Food Sovereignty Approach to Localization in International Solidarity

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Oliver

    (Director of International Programs, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada)

  • Leticia Ama Deawuo

    (Executive Director, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada)

  • Sheila Rao

    (Gender and Social Inclusion Specialist, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada
    Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

Abstract

Renewed calls for localization and the “decolonization of aid” are raising questions about whose knowledge and control are privileged. This article argues that in order to support local decision-making on food systems and agricultural aid, international solidarity work should look towards food sovereignty and agroecology approaches. Food sovereignty and agroecology, informed by feminist approaches, can provide important lessons for localization as they prioritize local knowledge and decision-making, and are based on social justice principles. They also provide alternatives to the problematic concept of “development”, particularly the agro-industrial development model which contributes to environmental and health crises, corporate concentration, colonialism and inequality. An example of the trajectory of the NGO SeedChange is provided to help illustrate how food sovereignty can: (1) provide an alternative to problematic development concepts, and (2) encourage localization and greater priority to global South perspectives. While acknowledging that there exist contradictions and challenges to shared decision-making, learning from partners in the global South working for seed and food sovereignty has been crucial to shaping the organization’s programs and policy advocacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Oliver & Leticia Ama Deawuo & Sheila Rao, 2022. "A Food Sovereignty Approach to Localization in International Solidarity," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:145-:d:942017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14084 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "The Paradox of Agricultural Subsidies: Measurement Issues, Agricultural Dumping, and Policy Reform," GDAE Working Papers 04-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy Hinton & Sophia Carodenuto, 2025. "Exploring recipes of (de)colonization: a scoping review of decolonization and food systems scholarship," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 2261-2282, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Agricultural Dumping Under NAFTA: Estimating the Costs of U.S. Agricultural Policies to Mexican Producers," GDAE Working Papers 09-08, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Identifying the Real Winners from U.S. Agricultural Policies," GDAE Working Papers 05-07, GDAE, Tufts University.
    4. Elanor Starmer & Aimee Witteman & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Feeding the Factory Farm: Implicit Subsidies to the Broiler Chicken Industry," GDAE Working Papers 06-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    5. van Schoor, Melt, 2005. "General Equilibrium Effects in the South African Maize Market: International Trade Simulations," Working Paper Series 15632, PROVIDE Project.
    6. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Policy Space for Mexican Maize:Protecting Agro-biodiversity by Promoting Rural Livelihoods," GDAE Working Papers 07-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Is Economics a Natural Science?," GDAE Working Papers 04-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    8. Demirdöğen, Alper, 2011. "Tarımsal Korumacılık, Korumacılığın Ölçümü ve Türkiye [Agricultural Protectionism, Its Measurement and Turkey]," MPRA Paper 35083, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Pavlos Karanikolas & Dimitrios Bourdaras & Dimitrios Kremmydas & Nikos Martinos, 2008. "Support And Protection of Greek Agriculture: Inter-temporal Developments and Sectoral Diversification," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 6(2), pages 197-212.
    10. Md. Tanveer Ahmed & Jun Zhuang & Changhyun Kwon, 2017. "Understanding Conflicting Interests of a Government and a Tobacco Manufacturer: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 1209-1230, November.
    11. Vibeke Bjornlund & Henning Bjornlund & André Rooyen, 2022. "Why food insecurity persists in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of existing evidence," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(4), pages 845-864, August.
    12. James Boyce, 2004. "A Future for Small Farms? Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture," Working Papers wp86, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    13. Jean Balié & Badri Narayanan, 2019. "What Should be the Focus of Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa? A CGE Analysis," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 401-435, November.
    14. Michel Fok, 2006. "Liberalization and globalization: Trojan Horse for the cotton traders' domination in Francophone Africa," Post-Print halshs-00325019, HAL.
    15. Sridhar, V., . "The WTO Threat to Food Security," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 7(2).
    16. Mora-Alfaro, Jorge, 2005. "Política agraria y desarrollo rural en Costa Rica: elementos para su definición en el nuevo entorno internacional [Agrarian policies and rural development in Costa Rica: definitions elements in the new international context]," MPRA Paper 1525, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Mahon, N. & Crute, I. & Di Bonito, M. & Simmons, E.A. & Islam, M.M., 2018. "Towards a broad-based and holistic framework of Sustainable Intensification indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 576-597.
    18. Perry, Santiago, 2008. "Tropical and Diversification Products: Strategic Options for Developing Countries," WTO Doha Round 320144, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    19. Sarah Bowen & Peter Gerritsen, 2007. "Reverse leasing and power dynamics among blue agave farmers in western Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(4), pages 473-488, December.
    20. NDOUTORLENGAR Médard & TAMTIAL Ngariban & DAOUYA Philémon, 2015. "Peasants of Tropical Africa Face the Challenges of Agricultural Produce Markets (Case Study of the Self-Managed Market of Cotton in Chad)," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 4(07), pages 21-27, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:145-:d:942017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.