IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i5p145-d942017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Food Sovereignty Approach to Localization in International Solidarity

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Oliver

    (Director of International Programs, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada)

  • Leticia Ama Deawuo

    (Executive Director, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada)

  • Sheila Rao

    (Gender and Social Inclusion Specialist, SeedChange, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B1, Canada
    Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

Abstract

Renewed calls for localization and the “decolonization of aid” are raising questions about whose knowledge and control are privileged. This article argues that in order to support local decision-making on food systems and agricultural aid, international solidarity work should look towards food sovereignty and agroecology approaches. Food sovereignty and agroecology, informed by feminist approaches, can provide important lessons for localization as they prioritize local knowledge and decision-making, and are based on social justice principles. They also provide alternatives to the problematic concept of “development”, particularly the agro-industrial development model which contributes to environmental and health crises, corporate concentration, colonialism and inequality. An example of the trajectory of the NGO SeedChange is provided to help illustrate how food sovereignty can: (1) provide an alternative to problematic development concepts, and (2) encourage localization and greater priority to global South perspectives. While acknowledging that there exist contradictions and challenges to shared decision-making, learning from partners in the global South working for seed and food sovereignty has been crucial to shaping the organization’s programs and policy advocacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Oliver & Leticia Ama Deawuo & Sheila Rao, 2022. "A Food Sovereignty Approach to Localization in International Solidarity," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:145-:d:942017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2003. "Reaching the Rural Poor : A Renewed Strategy for Rural Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14084, December.
    2. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "The Paradox of Agricultural Subsidies: Measurement Issues, Agricultural Dumping, and Policy Reform," GDAE Working Papers 04-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Micevska & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2008. "Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in the Himalayas," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 163-193, October.
    2. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Thanh Thu Do, "undated". "A Review Of The Role Of Collectors In Vietnams Rice Value Network," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201713, Reviewsep.
    5. Ruth Stewart & Yvonne Erasmus & Hazel Zaranyika & Natalie Rebelo Da Silva & Marcel Korth & Laurenz Langer & Nicola Randall & Nolizwe Madinga & Thea de Wet, 2014. "The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 58-68, January.
    6. Elanor Starmer & Aimee Witteman & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Feeding the Factory Farm: Implicit Subsidies to the Broiler Chicken Industry," GDAE Working Papers 06-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Bernard, Tanguy & Spielman, David J. & Seyoum Taffesse, Alemayehu & Gabre-Madhin, Eleni Z., 2010. "Cooperatives for staple crop marketing: Evidence from Ethiopia," Research reports 164, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Tina L. Saitone & Richard J. Sexton & Benoît Malan, 2018. "Price premiums, payment delays, and default risk: understanding developing country farmers’ decisions to market through a cooperative or a private trader," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 363-380, May.
    9. Ibrahim Demir, 2016. "The firm size, farm size, and transaction costs: the case of hazelnut farms in Turkey," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 81-90, January.
    10. Ruth Stewart & Yvonne Erasmus & Hazel Zaranyika & Natalie Rebelo Da Silva & Evans Muchiri & Marcel Korth & Laurenz Langer & Nolizwe Madinga & Nicola Randall & Thea de Wet, 2014. "PROTOCOL: The Effects of Training, Innovation and New Technology on African Smallholder Farmers' Wealth and Food Security: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-87.
    11. Benjamin, Emmanuel O. & Ola, Oreoluwa & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2018. "Does an agroforestry scheme with payment for ecosystem services (PES) economically empower women in sub-Saharan Africa?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 1-11.
    12. von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher, 2015. "Small Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic Development," Discussion Papers 210464, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    13. World Bank, 2004. "Drainage for Gain : Integrated Solutions to Drainage in Land and Water Management," World Bank Publications - Reports 14419, The World Bank Group.
    14. Gustavo Anríquez & Kostas Stamoulis, 2007. "Rural development and poverty reduction: is agriculture still the key?," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 4(1), pages 5-46.
    15. Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2011. "Scale Effects, Technical Efficiency and Land Lease in China," 2011 ASAE 7th International Conference, October 13-15, Hanoi, Vietnam 290658, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    16. Elgizouli, Ismail & Umbadda, Siddig, 2013. "Foreign Aid and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 081, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Is Economics a Natural Science?," GDAE Working Papers 04-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    18. Demirdöğen, Alper, 2011. "Tarımsal Korumacılık, Korumacılığın Ölçümü ve Türkiye [Agricultural Protectionism, Its Measurement and Turkey]," MPRA Paper 35083, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Pavlos Karanikolas & Dimitrios Bourdaras & Dimitrios Kremmydas & Nikos Martinos, 2008. "Support And Protection of Greek Agriculture: Inter-temporal Developments and Sectoral Diversification," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 6(2), pages 197-212.
    20. Md. Tanveer Ahmed & Jun Zhuang & Changhyun Kwon, 2017. "Understanding Conflicting Interests of a Government and a Tobacco Manufacturer: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 1209-1230, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:145-:d:942017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.