IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i4p118-d886396.html

The Psychology of Financial Giving: Values Congruence and Normative Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Alumni Monetary Donations to Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Donald G. Gardner

    (College of Business, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA)

  • Jon L. Pierce

    (Labovitz School of Business, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812, USA)

Abstract

Many universities around the world depend on financial donations to maintain and enhance their operations. We propose that donating money to an organization is a specific form of organizational citizenship behavior. We theorize that perceived values congruence between alumni and their colleges/universities and normative organizational commitment each provide motivation for people to donate money. We tested our hypotheses using alumni from a private college in the USA, measuring both the amount as well as the frequency of their donations to the college. We also measured alumni self-reports of values congruence and normative organizational commitment. We found empirical support for a positive relationship between values congruence and commitment and between commitment and financial giving. Values congruence, however, was not related to giving behavior; normative organizational commitment fully mediated the relationship between values congruence, and the alumnus’ financial giving behaviors. Higher education organizations that depend on donations from members to sustain their operations might focus advancement efforts on developing a perception of values congruence in potential donors, and/or by stimulating a sense of obligation to give back to the colleges from which they have previously derived benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald G. Gardner & Jon L. Pierce, 2022. "The Psychology of Financial Giving: Values Congruence and Normative Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Alumni Monetary Donations to Higher Education," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:118-:d:886396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/4/118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/4/118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Dijk, Mathilde & Van Herk, Hester & Prins, Remco, 2019. "Choosing your charity: The importance of value congruence in two-stage donation choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 283-292.
    2. René Bekkers & Pamala Wiepking, 2011. "Accuracy of self-reports on donations to charitable organizations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1369-1383, October.
    3. Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Rozélia Laurett & Nívea Coelho Pereira Degasperi & Sarah Venturim Lasso, 2016. "What motivates an individual to make donations of money and / or goods?," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(1), pages 81-99, April.
    4. David Weerts & Justin Ronca, 2009. "Using classification trees to predict alumni giving for higher education," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 95-122.
    5. Beatty, Sharon E. & Kahle, Lynn R. & Homer, Pamela, 1991. "Personal values and gift-giving behaviors: A study across cultures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 149-157, March.
    6. Tomás González & Manuel Guillén, 2008. "Organizational Commitment: A Proposal for a Wider Ethical Conceptualization of ‘Normative Commitment’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 401-414, March.
    7. Christen Lara & Daniel Johnson, 2014. "The anatomy of a likely donor: econometric evidence on philanthropy to higher education," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 293-304, June.
    8. Imer, Pinar H. & Kabasakal, Hayat & Dastmalchian, Ali, 2014. "Personality and contextual antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior: A study of two occupational groups," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 441-462, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laila Kundzina & Baiba Rivza & Liva Grinevica & Peteris Rivza, 2023. "General Fundraising Trends among University Patrons and Entrepreneurs to Promote the Sustainability of Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minguez, Ana & Javier Sese, F., 2022. "Why do you want a relationship, anyway? Consent to receive marketing communications and donors’ willingness to engage with nonprofits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 356-367.
    2. Dong Lyu & Zhongfeng Wang & Rongrong Song & Jia Jin, 2025. "Greater effort, greater pain: Givers’ feelings of social exclusion in gift failures across close and distant relationships," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Dana M. Williams, 2025. "University Alumni Donations as Threats to Punish or Promises to Reward: Alumni Loyalty Before and After the Elimination of a Native American Nickname and Logo," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(1), pages 1-28, February.
    4. repec:pri:cepsud:224rosen is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Daoust, Jean-François & Nadeau, Richard & Dassonneville, Ruth & Lachapelle, Erick & Bélanger, Éric & Savoie, Justin & van der Linden, Clifton, 2020. "How to survey citizens’ compliance with COVID-19 public health measures? Evidence from three survey experiments," SocArXiv gursd, Center for Open Science.
    6. Dave Webb & Janine Wong, 2014. "Exploring Antecedents of Charitable Giving and Their Impact on Subjective Well-Being in Singapore," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 65-87, May.
    7. João R. Faria & Franklin G. Mixon, 2018. "Entrepreneurial Philanthropy and University Creation: An Economic Model," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 1067-1086, September.
    8. Guido, Gianluigi & Pino, Giovanni & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2016. "Assessing individuals' re-gifting motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5956-5963.
    9. Cam Caldwell, 2011. "Duties Owed to Organizational Citizens – Ethical Insights for Today’s Leader," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 343-356, September.
    10. Adalberto Rangone & Luca Busolli, 2021. "Managing charity 4.0 with Blockchain: a case study at the time of Covid-19," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 491-521, December.
    11. Jonathan Meer & Harvey S. Rosen, 2009. "Family Bonding with Universities," Working Papers 1163, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    12. Spanuth, Thomas & Wald, Andreas, 2017. "Understanding the antecedents of organizational commitment in the context of temporary organizations: An empirical study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 129-138.
    13. Neel Das & Lubna Nafees & Unal O. Boya & Anindita Das, 2024. "Is roundup donation request always preferred: a case for checkout charity," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(3), pages 645-658, September.
    14. Ye Yang & Angela Paladino, 2015. "The case of wine: understanding Chinese gift-giving behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 335-361, September.
    15. Blanco, M. & Dalton, Patricio, 2019. "Generosity and Wealth : Experimental Evidence from Bogota Stratification," Other publications TiSEM 732a238e-a6d3-428b-a062-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. James H. McAlexander & Harold F. Koenig & Beth DuFault, 2014. "Advancement in higher education: the role of marketing in building philanthropic giving," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-256, December.
    17. Basant Hassan Ali & Nadia Elaref & Omneya Mokhtar Yacout, 2023. "The effect of charity brand experience on donors’ behavioral intentions: The mediating role of charity brand personality and donors’ satisfaction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(4), pages 875-903, December.
    18. Soffien Bataoui & Emmanuelle Boch, 2023. "The role of socially rich photos in generating favorable donation behavior on charity websites," Post-Print hal-04809364, HAL.
    19. Hee-Woong Kim & Atreyi Kankanhalli & So-Hyun Lee, 2018. "Examining Gifting Through Social Network Services: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 805-828, December.
    20. Grazyna Aleksandra Wiejak-Roy & Alice Elizabeth Williams, 2025. "Gifts, Corporate Policies, and Individual Morality in UK’s Alternative Real Estate Lending Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 641-661, October.
    21. Gao, Hailian & Huang, Songshan (Sam) & Brown, Graham, 2017. "The influence of face on Chinese tourists’ gift purchase behaviour: The moderating role of the gift giver–receiver relationship," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 97-106.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:118-:d:886396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.