IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i4p235-d1124261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Role of Gamification in the Online Shopping Experience in Retail Stores: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • João M. Lopes

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    NECE-UBI—Research Unit in Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Sofia Gomes

    (REMIT—Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Pedro Lopes

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Adriana Silva

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Daniel Lourenço

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Duarte Esteves

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Mafalda Cardoso

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Valter Redondo

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, NECE—Research Center for Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

Online retail shops increasingly implement gamified marketing strategies to enrich consumers’ online experience and increase engagement. This study aims to evaluate the ludic experience of consumers in online retail stores and the role of gamification and game mechanics in changing the online shopping experience. It seeks to assess, through a qualitative methodology, based on an exploratory study approach obtained through 30 interviews with Portuguese consumers, whether consumers have playful experiences when shopping in online retail shops and whether the introduction of game mechanics changes this experience by generating co-creation. The results show that online shopping can be playful and generate positive emotional benefits. However, gamification in online retail shops is not guided by a co-creation process, nor do game mechanics create greater online consumer engagement. There is a need to review how gamification is introduced in online retail shops, and strategies should be designed to co-create experience value and brand co-creation. This study is original, as it contributes to developing knowledge about gamification in the context of the online retail experience. Studies on this topic are scarce, and this study contributes to filling that gap.

Suggested Citation

  • João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Pedro Lopes & Adriana Silva & Daniel Lourenço & Duarte Esteves & Mafalda Cardoso & Valter Redondo, 2023. "Exploring the Role of Gamification in the Online Shopping Experience in Retail Stores: An Exploratory Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:235-:d:1124261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Karen L. & Duxbury, Linda, 2010. "The view from the field: A case study of the expatriate boundary-spanning role," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 29-40, January.
    2. Maya Kavaliova & Farzad Virjee & Natalia Maehle & Ingeborg Astrid Kleppe, 2016. "Crowdsourcing innovation and product development: Gamification as a motivational driver," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1128132-112, December.
    3. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Hogan, Suellen J. & Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah, 2017. "Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-66.
    4. Hwang, Jiyoung & Choi, Laee, 2020. "Having fun while receiving rewards?: Exploration of gamification in loyalty programs for consumer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 365-376.
    5. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yipeng & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: The case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    2. Powen Fang & Yaochuan Tsai & Hsinhsin Chang, 2013. "Relationship Performance on Self-Service Technology: Relationship Maintenance and Perceived Relationship Investment," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    3. Jung, Jae Min & Hui, Hang Chu (“Michel”) & Min, Kyeong Sam & Martin, Drew, 2014. "Does telic/paratelic user mode matter on the effectiveness of interactive internet advertising? A reversal theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1303-1309.
    4. Meents, S. & Verhagen, T. & Vlaar, P.W.L., 2011. "How sellers can stimulate purchasing in electronic marketplaces: Using information as a risk reduction signal," Serie Research Memoranda 0014, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    6. Osama Sohaib & Kyeong Kang & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2018. "Gender-Based iTrust in E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. De Silva, Muthu & Rossi, Federica & Yip, Nick K.T. & Rosli, Ainurul, 2021. "Does affective evaluation matter for the success of university-industry collaborations? A sentiment analysis of university-industry collaborative project reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    9. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Nesset, Erik & Bergem, Ola & Nervik, Bjørn & Schiøll Sørlie, Even & Helgesen, Øyvind, 2021. "Building chain loyalty in grocery retailing by means of loyalty programs – A study of ‘the Norwegian case’," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Smyth, Hedley J., 2019. "Multiplex value cocreation in unique service exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-286.
    12. Han, Sang-Lin & An, Myounga & Han, Jerry J. & Lee, Jiyoung, 2020. "Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 311-320.
    13. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    14. Julia Backmann & Rouven Kanitz & Amy Wei Tian & Patrick Hoffmann & Martin Hoegl, 2020. "Cultural gap bridging in multinational teams," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(8), pages 1283-1311, October.
    15. Wagner, Gerhard & Schramm-Klein, Hanna & Steinmann, Sascha, 2017. "Consumers' attitudes and intentions toward Internet-enabled TV shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 278-286.
    16. Mifsud, Matthieu & Molines, Mathieu & Cases, Anne-Sophie & N'Goala, Gilles, 2019. "It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 307-315.
    17. Holdack, Eric & Lurie-Stoyanov, Katja & Fromme, Harro Fabian, 2022. "The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Song-yi Youn & Joohye Hwang & Li Zhao & Jong-Bum Kim, 2023. "Privacy paradox in 3D body scanning technology: the effect of 3D virtual try-on experience in the relationship between privacy concerns and mobile app adoption intention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Kirk, Colleen P. & Chiagouris, Larry & Gopalakrishna, Pradeep, 2012. "Some people just want to read: The roles of age, interactivity, and perceived usefulness of print in the consumption of digital information products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 168-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:235-:d:1124261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.