IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i5p200-d807637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method for Detecting Far-Right Extremist Communities on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Karpova

    (Division for Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Core Engineering Education, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Aleksei Savelev

    (Division for Information Technology, School of Computer Science & Robotics, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Alexander Vilnin

    (Division for Information Technology, School of Computer Science & Robotics, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Sergey Kuznetsov

    (Division for Information Technology, School of Computer Science & Robotics, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

Abstract

Far-right extremist communities actively promote their ideological preferences on social media. This provides researchers with opportunities to study these communities online. However, to explore these opportunities one requires a way to identify the far-right extremists’ communities in an automated way. Having analyzed the subject area of far-right extremist communities, we identified three groups of factors that influence the effectiveness of the research work. These are a group of theoretical, methodological, and instrumental factors. We developed and implemented a unique algorithm of calendar-correlation analysis (CCA) to search for specific online communities. We based CCA on a hybrid calendar correlation approach identifying potential far-right communities by characteristic changes in group activity around key dates of events that are historically crucial to those communities. The developed software module includes several functions designed to automatically search, process, and analyze social media data. In the current paper we present a process diagram showing CCA’s mechanism of operation and its relationship to elements of automated search software. Furthermore, we outline the limiting factors of the developed algorithm. The algorithm was tested on data from the Russian social network VKontakte. Two experimental data sets were formed: 259 far-right communities and the 49 most popular (not far-right) communities. In both cases, we calculated the type II error for two mutually exclusive hypotheses—far-right affiliation and no affiliation. Accordingly, for the first sample, β = 0.81. For the second sample, β = 0.02. The presented CCA algorithm was more effective at identifying far-right communities belonging to the alt-right and Nazi ideologies compared to the neo-pagan or manosphere communities. We expect that the CCA algorithm can be effectively used to identify other movements within far-right extremist communities when an appropriate foundation of expert knowledge is provided to the algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Karpova & Aleksei Savelev & Alexander Vilnin & Sergey Kuznetsov, 2022. "Method for Detecting Far-Right Extremist Communities on Social Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:200-:d:807637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/5/200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/5/200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iyad Rahwan & Jacob W. Crandall & Jean-François Bonnefon, 2020. "Intelligent machines as social catalysts," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(14), pages 7555-7557, April.
    2. Reuter, Ora John & Szakonyi, David, 2015. "Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 29-51, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas F. Remington & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Elena Ovchinnikova & Alexander Chasovsky, 2020. "Career Trajectories Of Regional Officials: Russia And China Before And After 2012," HSE Working papers WP BRP 754/PS/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Bharati, Tushar & Jetter, Michael & Malik, Muhammad Nauman, 2022. "Types of Communications Technology and Civil Conflict," IZA Discussion Papers 15311, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Hojun Choi, 2020. "The Modern Online Democracy: An Evaluation of Social Media's Ability to Facilitate Political Discourse," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 12(1), pages 277-289, October.
    4. Nora A. Kirkizh & Olessia Y. Koltsova, 2018. "Online News and Protest Participation in a Political Context: Evidence from Self-Reported Cross-Sectional Data," HSE Working papers WP BRP 58/PS/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Lian Tang & Siti Zobidah Omar & Jusang Bolong & Julia Wirza Mohd Zawawi, 2021. "Social Media Use Among Young People in China: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    6. Ruben Enikolopov & Alexey Makarin & Maria Petrova, 2020. "Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1479-1514, July.
    7. Chugunova, Marina & Sele, Daniela, 2022. "We and It: An interdisciplinary review of the experimental evidence on how humans interact with machines," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Sendhil Mullainathan & Andrei Shleifer, 2005. "The Market for News," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1031-1053, September.
    9. Zhou, Yonghong, 2023. "Influence of political movement on fields of study: Evidence from Hong Kong," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Frye, Timothy & Borisova, Ekaterina, 2016. "Elections, protest and trust in government: A natural experiment from Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2016, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    11. repec:thr:techub:10012:y:2020:i:1:p:277-289 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. David Szakonyi & Ora John Reuter, 2020. "Electoral Manipulation and Regime Support: Survey Evidence from Russia," Working Papers 2020-19, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    13. Scott Williamson & Mashail Malik, 2021. "Contesting narratives of repression: Experimental evidence from Sisi’s Egypt," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1018-1033, September.
    14. David Szakonyi, 2020. "Candidate Filtering: The Strategic Use of Electoral Fraud in Russia," Working Papers 2020-23, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:200-:d:807637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.