IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i5p98-d1150550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Gain Confidence in the Results of Internal Risk Models? Approaches and Techniques for Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Dacorogna

    (Prime RE Solutions, 6300 Zug, Switzerland)

Abstract

The development of risk models for managing portfolios of financial institutions and insurance companies requires, both from the regulatory and management points of view, a strong validation of the quality of the results provided by internal risk models. In Solvency II, for instance, regulators ask for independent validation reports from companies who apply for the approval of their internal models. We analyze here various ways to enable management and regulators to gain confidence in the quality of models. It all starts by ensuring a good calibration of the risk models and the dependencies between the various risk drivers. Then, by applying stress tests to the model and various empirical analyses, in particular the probability integral transform, we can build a full and credible framework to validate risk models.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Dacorogna, 2023. "How to Gain Confidence in the Results of Internal Risk Models? Approaches and Techniques for Validation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:98-:d:1150550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/98/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/98/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valeria Bignozzi & Andreas Tsanakas, 2016. "Parameter Uncertainty and Residual Estimation Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(4), pages 949-978, December.
    2. Mack, Thomas, 1993. "Distribution-free Calculation of the Standard Error of Chain Ladder Reserve Estimates," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 213-225, November.
    3. Busse, Marc & Müller, Ulrich & Dacorogna, Michel, 2010. "Robust Estimation of Reserve Risk," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 453-489, November.
    4. Jean-Philippe Bruneton, 2011. "Copula-based Hierarchical Aggregation of Correlated Risks. The behaviour of the diversification benefit in Gaussian and Lognormal Trees," Papers 1111.1113, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2011.
    5. Dacorogna, Michel & Elbahtouri, Laila & Kratz, Marie, 2018. "Validation of aggregated risks models," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 433-454, September.
    6. Fröhlich, Andreas & Weng, Annegret, 2018. "Parameter uncertainty and reserve risk under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-141.
    7. Kratz, Marie & Lok, Yen H. & McNeil, Alexander J., 2018. "Multinomial VaR backtests: A simple implicit approach to backtesting expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 393-407.
    8. Meese, Richard A. & Rogoff, Kenneth, 1983. "Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies : Do they fit out of sample?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 3-24, February.
    9. Arbenz, Philipp & Canestraro, Davide, 2012. "Estimating Copulas for Insurance from Scarce Observations, Expert Opinion and Prior Information: A Bayesian Approach," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 271-290, May.
    10. Michel Dacorogna & Alessandro Ferriero & David Krief, 2018. "One-Year Change Methodologies for Fixed-Sum Insurance Contracts," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dacorogna, Michel M, 2017. "Approaches and Techniques to Validate Internal Model Results," MPRA Paper 79632, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Michel Dacorogna & Alessandro Ferriero & David Krief, 2018. "One-Year Change Methodologies for Fixed-Sum Insurance Contracts," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    4. Soren Bettels & Sojung Kim & Stefan Weber, 2022. "Multinomial Backtesting of Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2201.06319, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    5. Fröhlich, Andreas & Weng, Annegret, 2018. "Parameter uncertainty and reserve risk under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-141.
    6. Carnevale Giulio Ercole & Clemente Gian Paolo, 2020. "A Bayesian Internal Model for Reserve Risk: An Extension of the Correlated Chain Ladder," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Stefan Mittnik & Nikolay Robinzonov & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2013. "The Micro Dynamics of Macro Announcements," CESifo Working Paper Series 4421, CESifo.
    8. Lucio Sarno & Giorgio Valente, 2009. "Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: Footloose or Evolving Relationship?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(4), pages 786-830, June.
    9. Kelly Burns & Imad Moosa, 2017. "Demystifying the Meese–Rogoff puzzle: structural breaks or measures of forecasting accuracy?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(48), pages 4897-4910, October.
    10. Menzies Gordon Douglas & Zizzo Daniel John, 2009. "Inferential Expectations," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Gürkaynak, Refet S. & Kısacıkoğlu, Burçin & Lee, Sang Seok, 2022. "Exchange rate and inflation under weak monetary policy: Turkey verifies theory," CFS Working Paper Series 679, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    12. Coudert, Virginie & Mignon, Valérie, 2013. "The “forward premium puzzle” and the sovereign default risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 491-511.
    13. Agnès Bénassy‐Quéré & Lionel Fontagné & Horst Raff, 2011. "Exchange‐rate Misalignments in Duopoly: The Case of Airbus and Boeing," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 623-641, April.
    14. Rime, Dagfinn & Sarno, Lucio & Sojli, Elvira, 2010. "Exchange rate forecasting, order flow and macroeconomic information," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 72-88, January.
    15. Yamani, Ehab, 2019. "Diversification role of currency momentum for carry trade: Evidence from financial crises," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-19.
    16. Lothian, James R., 1997. "Multi-country evidence on the behavior of purchasing power parity under the current float," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 19-35, February.
    17. Marcos Álvarez-Díaz & Alberto Álvarez, 2002. "Predicción No-Lineal De Tipos De Cambio: Algoritmos Genéticos, Redes Neuronales Y Fusión De Datos," Working Papers 0205, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    18. Carlo Altavilla & Paul De Grauwe, 2010. "Forecasting and combining competing models of exchange rate determination," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(27), pages 3455-3480.
    19. Alberto Fuertes & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2019. "“Forecasting emerging market currencies: Are inflation expectations useful?”," IREA Working Papers 201918, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2019.
    20. Hillebrand, Eric & Lukas, Manuel & Wei, Wei, 2021. "Bagging weak predictors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 237-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:98-:d:1150550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.