IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Copula-based Hierarchical Aggregation of Correlated Risks. The behaviour of the diversification benefit in Gaussian and Lognormal Trees

  • Jean-Philippe Bruneton

The benefits of diversifying risks are difficult to estimate quantitatively because of the uncertainties in the dependence structure between the risks. Also, the modelling of multidimensional dependencies is a non-trivial task. This paper focuses on one such technique for portfolio aggregation, namely the aggregation of risks within trees, where dependencies are set at each step of the aggregation with the help of some copulas. We define rigorously this procedure and then study extensively the Gaussian Tree of quite arbitrary size and shape, where individual risks are normal, and where the Gaussian copula is used. We derive exact analytical results for the diversification benefit of the Gaussian tree as a function of its shape and of the dependency parameters. Such a "toy-model" of an aggregation tree enables one to understand the basic phenomena's at play while aggregating risks in this way. In particular, it is shown that, for a fixed number of individual risks, "thin" trees diversify better than "fat" trees. Related to this, it is shown that hierarchical trees have the natural tendency to lower the overall dependency with respect to the dependency parameter chosen at each step of the aggregation. We also show that these results hold in more general cases outside the gaussian world, and apply notably to more realistic portfolios (LogNormal trees). We believe that any insurer or reinsurer using such a tool should be aware of these systematic effects, and that this awareness should strongly call for designing trees that adequately fit the business. We finally address the issue of specifying the full joint distribution between the risks. We show that the hierarchical mechanism does not require nor specify the joint distribution, but that the latter can be determined exactly (in the Gaussian case) by adding conditional independence hypotheses between the risks and their sums.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Latest version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by in its series Papers with number 1111.1113.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 2011
Date of revision: Nov 2011
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1111.1113
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1111.1113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.