IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v12y2024i2p15-d1390378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Open Data Practices in Research-Performing Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Jean-Quartier

    (Research Data Management, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Harald Kleinberger-Pierer

    (Research Management and Service, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Barbara Zach

    (IDea_Lab, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Ilire Hasani-Mavriqi

    (Research Data Management, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Lea Pešec

    (IDea_Lab, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Clara Schmikl-Reiter

    (Research Organization and Services, FH JOANNEUM, 8020 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

Open data provide the scientific community and other stakeholders with unrestricted access to data. Open data serve as a foundation for reproducing research findings, while also facilitating collaboration and enabling novel discoveries. However, open data practices are still not commonly applied. To contribute to the implementation of open data strategy in academia in Austria and beyond, a collection of local strategies from regional universities and higher education institutions in the Austrian provinces of Styria and Carinthia was compiled through workshop-based discussions between participants from research support service units at research-performing organizations. The collection was further organized into categories based on application time scenarios, target groups, and involved parties, as well as corresponding thematic focus. A strategic guide consisting of various measures has been developed to encourage the adoption of open data practices from an organizational standpoint. Designed for adaptability, it aims to be applicable and modifiable by all interested research and higher education institutions, regardless of their priorities and resources. Our guideline aids research organizations in crafting a tailored strategy to enhance their data dissemination practices, thereby increasing their research visibility and impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Jean-Quartier & Harald Kleinberger-Pierer & Barbara Zach & Ilire Hasani-Mavriqi & Lea Pešec & Clara Schmikl-Reiter, 2024. "Fostering Open Data Practices in Research-Performing Organizations," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:15-:d:1390378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/2/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/2/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nosek, Brian A. & Ebersole, Charles R. & DeHaven, Alexander Carl & Mellor, David Thomas, 2018. "The Preregistration Revolution," OSF Preprints 2dxu5, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vigren, Andreas & Pyddoke, Roger, 2020. "The impact on bus ridership of passenger incentive contracts in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 144-159.
    2. Jasper Brinkerink, 2023. "When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P-Hacking in Family Business Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 304-343, March.
    3. Colin F. Camerer & Anna Dreber & Felix Holzmeister & Teck-Hua Ho & Jürgen Huber & Magnus Johannesson & Michael Kirchler & Gideon Nave & Brian A. Nosek & Thomas Pfeiffer & Adam Altmejd & Nick Buttrick , 2018. "Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 637-644, September.
    4. Nathalie Percie du Sert & Viki Hurst & Amrita Ahluwalia & Sabina Alam & Marc T Avey & Monya Baker & William J Browne & Alejandra Clark & Innes C Cuthill & Ulrich Dirnagl & Michael Emerson & Paul Garne, 2020. "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Reed, W. Robert, 2019. "Takeaways from the special issue on The Practice of Replication," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-11.
    6. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    7. Shuaijun Guo & Xiaoming Yu & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Moving Health Literacy Research and Practice towards a Vision of Equity, Precision and Transparency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Rubin, Mark, 2020. "Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?," MetaArXiv vgr89, Center for Open Science.
    9. Ivan Berlin, 2022. "Potential Bias in Assessing the Tobacco/Nicotine—COVID-19 Association—How to Improve Our Level of Understanding," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-6, October.
    10. Rik Peels & Lex Bouter, 2018. "The possibility and desirability of replication in the humanities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, December.
    11. Dominika Ehrenbergerova & Josef Bajzik & Tomas Havranek, 2023. "When Does Monetary Policy Sway House Prices? A Meta-Analysis," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(2), pages 538-573, June.
    12. Christopher Allen & David M A Mehler, 2019. "Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Wallander, Steven & Paul, Laura A. & Ferraro, Paul J. & Messer, Kent D. & Iovanna, Richard, 2023. "Informational nudges in conservation auctions: A field experiment with U.S. farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Marjan Bakker & Coosje L S Veldkamp & Marcel A L M van Assen & Elise A V Crompvoets & How Hwee Ong & Brian A Nosek & Courtney K Soderberg & David Mellor & Jelte M Wicherts, 2020. "Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Mattia Prosperi & Jiang Bian & Iain E. Buchan & James S. Koopman & Matthew Sperrin & Mo Wang, 2019. "Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    17. Chris H. J. Hartgerink & Marino Van Zelst, 2018. "“As-You-Go” Instead of “After-the-Fact”: A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication and Evaluation," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Alexander Ugarov, 2023. "Peer Prediction for Peer Review: Designing a Marketplace for Ideas," Papers 2303.16855, arXiv.org.
    19. Chin, Jason & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2021. "Replicability in Empirical Legal Research," LawArXiv 2b5k4, Center for Open Science.
    20. Brinkerink, Jasper & De Massis, Alfredo & Kellermanns, Franz, 2022. "One finding is no finding: Toward a replication culture in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:15-:d:1390378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.