IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v3y2023i2p17-317d1134036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peeling Away the Layers of Workplace Gossip: A Framework, Review, and Future Research Agenda to Study Workplace Gossip as a Dynamic and Complex Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Begemann

    (Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock

    (Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Maie Stein

    (Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Workplace gossip, a ubiquitous organizational behavior broadly defined as talking about an absent target in an evaluative way, has received increasing scientific attention over the past few years. The complexity and dynamism of the workplace gossip phenomenon create challenging research conditions such that studies focusing on the allegedly same type of workplace gossip can produce differential findings. To address this problem and better align theory and methodology, our manuscript first proposes a framework of workplace gossip that accounts for the interdependencies of the context-embeddedness and dynamism of workplace gossip. Guided by this framework, we systematically evaluate extant workplace gossip research, spanning a total of N = 104 empirical research articles. Highlighting current methodological challenges that indicate a neglect of the dynamic nuances and contexts of workplace gossip, we argue that previous organizational research painted an overly simplistic picture of workplace gossip. By looking beyond traditional organizational research designs, we derive recommendations to advance research on workplace gossip and, ultimately, to establish it as a complex and dynamic social interaction behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Begemann & Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock & Maie Stein, 2023. "Peeling Away the Layers of Workplace Gossip: A Framework, Review, and Future Research Agenda to Study Workplace Gossip as a Dynamic and Complex Behavior," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:17-317:d:1134036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Kirk & Kuo, Chien-Chih, 2021. "Can subordinates benefit from Manager’s gossip?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 497-507.
    2. Svea Luebstorf & Joseph A. Allen & Emilee Eden & William S. Kramer & Roni Reiter-Palmon & Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2023. "Digging into “Zoom Fatigue”: A Qualitative Exploration of Remote Work Challenges and Virtual Meeting Stressors," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Rafael Wittek & Rudi Wielers, 1998. "Gossip in Organizations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 189-204, June.
    4. Martinescu, Elena & Janssen, Onne & Nijstad, Bernard A., 2019. "Gossip as a resource: How and why power relationships shape gossip behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 89-102.
    5. Tassiello, Vito & Lombardi, Sara & Costabile, Michele, 2018. "Are we truly wicked when gossiping at work? The role of valence, interpersonal closeness and social awareness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 141-149.
    6. Stijn Decoster & Jeroen Camps & Jeroen Stouten & Lore Vandevyvere & Thomas Tripp, 2013. "Standing by Your Organization: The Impact of Organizational Identification and Abusive Supervision on Followers’ Perceived Cohesion and Tendency to Gossip," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 623-634, December.
    7. Xiao-Yu Liu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2020. "Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 325-344, March.
    8. Xing Zhou & Lele Fan & Cong Cheng & Yancheng Fan, 2021. "When and Why Do Good People Not Do Good Deeds? Third-Party Observers’ Unfavorable Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 599-617, July.
    9. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Xiangfan Wu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Long-Zeng Wu & Jie Ma, 2018. "The Effect of Workplace Negative Gossip on Employee Proactive Behavior in China: The Moderating Role of Traditionality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 801-815, April.
    11. Batia Ben-Hador, 2019. "Social capital levels, gossip and employee performance in aviation and shipping companies in Israel," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(6), pages 1036-1055, June.
    12. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    13. Lixin Jiang & Xiaohong Xu & Xiaowen Hu, 2019. "Can Gossip Buffer the Effect of Job Insecurity on Workplace Friendships?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezwan Ullah & Muhammad Zada & Imran Saeed & Jawad Khan & Muhammad Shahbaz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2021. "Have You Heard That—“GOSSIP”? Gossip Spreads Rapidly and Influences Broadly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    3. Boqiang Zong & Elena Martinescu & Bianca Beersma & Shiyong Xu & Lihua Zhang, 2024. "How Multi-Source Gossip Affects Targets’ Emotions and Strategic Behavioral Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 385-402, January.
    4. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Bao Cheng & Yan Peng & Ahmed Shaalan & Marwa Tourky, 2023. "The Hidden Costs of Negative Workplace Gossip: Its Effect on Targets’ Behaviors, the Mediating Role of Guanxi Closeness, and the Moderating Effect of Need for Affiliation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 287-302, January.
    6. Xiao-Yu Liu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2020. "Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 325-344, March.
    7. Bao Cheng & Yun Dong & Zhenduo Zhang & Ahmed Shaalan & Gongxing Guo & Yan Peng, 2022. "When Targets Strike Back: How Negative Workplace Gossip Triggers Political Acts by Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 289-302, January.
    8. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Devalle, Alain & Pellicelli, Anna Claudia, 2022. "Somebody is hiding something: Disentangling interpersonal level drivers and consequences of knowledge hiding in international entrepreneurial firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 383-396.
    9. Xing Zhou & Lele Fan & Cong Cheng & Yancheng Fan, 2021. "When and Why Do Good People Not Do Good Deeds? Third-Party Observers’ Unfavorable Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 599-617, July.
    10. Nasser Saad Alkahtani & M. M. Sulphey & Kevin Delany & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "A Conceptual Examination about the Correlates of Psychological Capital (PsyCap) among the Saudi Arabian Workforce," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Jeremy D. Mackey & Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander, 2021. "Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 755-775, February.
    12. Alamzeb Aamir & Sharif Ullah Jan & Abdul Qadus & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar, 2021. "Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Mung Khie Tsen & Manli Gu & Chee Meng Tan & See Kwong Goh, 2023. "Homeworking and Employee Job Stress and Work Engagement: A Multilevel Analysis from 34 European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 511-538, August.
    14. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    15. Felipe Muñoz Medina & Sergio López Bohle & Lixin Jiang & Maria José Chambel & Sebastian M Ugarte, 2023. "Qualitative job insecurity and voice behavior: Evaluation of the mediating effect of affective organizational commitment," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 986-1006, November.
    16. Martinescu, Elena & Janssen, Onne & Nijstad, Bernard A., 2019. "Gossip as a resource: How and why power relationships shape gossip behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 89-102.
    17. Budhi Haryanto & Edi Cahyono, 2019. "Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Performance: The Role of Gender," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 305-311.
    18. Yijiao Ye & Hong Zhu & Yuanyi Chen & Ho Kwong Kwan & Yijing Lyu, 2021. "Family ostracism and proactive customer service performance: An explanation from conservation of resources theory," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 645-667, June.
    19. Ponmythili Muppidathi & Venkat R. Krishnan, 2021. "Transformational Leadership and Follower’s Perceived Group Cohesiveness: Mediating Role of Follower’s Karma-yoga," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 269-285, May.
    20. K. Michele Kacmar & Reginald Tucker, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Supervisor’s Behavioral Integrity on the Relationship between Regulatory Focus and Impression Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 87-98, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:17-317:d:1134036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.