IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i1p38-d304033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristic Function and Time Consistency for Two-Stage Games with Network Externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Artem Sedakov

    (Department of Mathematical Game Theory and Statistical Decisions, Saint Petersburg State University,7/9 Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
    School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
    Institute of Applied Mathematics of Shandong, Qingdao 266071, China)

Abstract

Time consistency is a property of the solution to a cooperative dynamic game which guarantees that this solution remains stable with respect to its revision by players over time. The fulfillment of this property is directly related to the characteristic function and its behavior with the course of the game as any solution is based on this function. In this paper, we will examine the characteristic functions for two economic models with network externalities represented by a two-stage network game using the theory developed for this class of games. For a network game with positive externalities represented by a public goods provision model, we demonstrate a sufficient condition for time consistency. For a network game with negative externalities represented by a market competition model, we show that the cooperative solution is always time consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Artem Sedakov, 2020. "Characteristic Function and Time Consistency for Two-Stage Games with Network Externalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:38-:d:304033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/1/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/1/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Driessen, Theo S.H. & Meinhardt, Holger I., 2005. "Convexity of oligopoly games without transferable technologies," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 102-126, July.
    2. Goyal, Sanjeev & Joshi, Sumit, 2003. "Networks of collaboration in oligopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 57-85, April.
    3. Pascal Billand & Christophe Bravard & Jacques Durieu & Sudipta Sarangi, 2019. "Firm Heterogeneity And The Pattern Of R&D Collaborations," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(4), pages 1896-1914, October.
    4. Andrea Galeotti & Sanjeev Goyal, 2010. "The Law of the Few," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1468-1492, September.
    5. Nizar Allouch & Maia King, 2019. "Constrained public goods in networks," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(5), pages 895-902, October.
    6. Pandit, Parthe & Kulkarni, Ankur A., 2018. "Refinement of the equilibrium of public goods games over networks: Efficiency and effort of specialized equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 125-139.
    7. Aymeric Lardon, 2012. "The γ-core in Cournot oligopoly TU-games with capacity constraints," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 387-411, March.
    8. Rajan, Roby, 1989. "Endogenous Coalition Formation in Cooperative Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 30(4), pages 863-876, November.
    9. Zhao, Jingang, 1999. "A necessary and sufficient condition for the convexity in oligopoly games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 189-204, March.
    10. Bramoulle, Yann & Kranton, Rachel, 2007. "Public goods in networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 478-494, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Artem Sedakov & Hao Sun, 2020. "The Relationship between the Core and the Modified Cores of a Dynamic Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Daniel Gómez & Javier Castro & Inmaculada Gutiérrez & Rosa Espínola, 2021. "A New Edge Betweenness Measure Using a Game Theoretical Approach: An Application to Hierarchical Community Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takeda, Kohei & Hosoe, Toyoki & Watanabe, Takayuki & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2018. "Stability analysis of horizontal mergers in a market with asymmetric substitutability," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 73-84.
    2. Jackson, Matthew O. & Zenou, Yves, 2015. "Games on Networks," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    3. Dongshuang Hou & Aymeric Lardon & T. S. H. Driessen, 2017. "Stackelberg Oligopoly TU-Games: Characterization and Nonemptiness of the Core," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Allouch, Nizar & King, Maia, 2021. "Welfare targeting in networks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. , D. & Tessone, Claudio J. & ,, 2014. "Nestedness in networks: A theoretical model and some applications," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), September.
    6. Hiller, Timo, 2022. "A simple model of network formation with competition effects," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Aymeric Lardon, 2014. "A Partial Characterization of the Core in Bertrand Oligopoly TU-games with Transferable Technologies," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-33, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    8. M. Koenig & Claudio J. Tessone & Yves Zenou, "undated". "A Dynamic Model of Network Formation with Strategic Interactions," Working Papers CCSS-09-006, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    9. Bervoets, Sebastian & Faure, Mathieu, 2020. "Convergence in games with continua of equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 25-30.
    10. Karan N. Chadha & Ankur A. Kulkarni, 2022. "On independent cliques and linear complementarity problems," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1036-1057, December.
    11. Arthur Schram & Boris Van Leeuwen & Theo Offerman, 2013. "Superstars Need Social Benefits: An Experiment on Network Formation," Working Papers 1306, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Jul 2013.
    12. Allouch, Nizar, 2017. "The cost of segregation in (social) networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 329-342.
    13. Liu, Xiaodong & Patacchini, Eleonora & Zenou, Yves & Lee, Lung-Fei, 2011. "Criminal Networks: Who is the Key Player?," Research Papers in Economics 2011:7, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    14. Joshi, Sumit & Mahmud, Ahmed Saber, 2018. "Unilateral and multilateral sanctions: A network approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 52-65.
    15. Gaudeul, Alexia & Giannetti, Caterina, 2011. "The role of reciprocation in social network formation, with an application to blogging," MPRA Paper 34094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Nora, Vladyslav & Winter, Eyal, 2024. "Exploiting social influence in networks," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(1), January.
    17. Péter Bayer & Ani Guerdjikova, 2020. "Optimism leads to optimality: Ambiguity in network formation," Working Papers hal-03005107, HAL.
    18. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Optimal deterrence of cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(1), pages 207-227, March.
    19. Ying Chen & Tom Lane & Stuart McDonald, 2023. "Endogenous Network Formation in Local Public Goods: An Experimental Analysis," Discussion Papers 2023-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    20. Bayer, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peeters, Ronald, 2021. "Farsighted manipulation and exploitation in networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:38-:d:304033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.