IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i15p2431-d1711877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory Constraints in Uncertainty Misestimation: A Computational Model of Working Memory and Environmental Change Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Li Xin Lim

    (Center of Advance Human Brain Imaging Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)

  • Rei Akaishi

    (Center for Brain Science, RIKEN, Wako 351-0106, Saitama, Japan)

  • Sébastien Hélie

    (Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

Reinforcement learning models often rely on uncertainty estimation to guide decision-making in dynamic environments. However, the role of memory limitations in representing statistical regularities in the environment is less understood. This study investigated how limited memory capacity influence uncertainty estimation, potentially leading to misestimations of outcomes and environmental statistics. We developed a computational model incorporating active working memory processes and lateral inhibition to demonstrate how relevant information is selected, stored, and used to estimate uncertainty. The model allows for the detection of contextual changes by estimating expected uncertainty and perceived volatility. Two experiments were conducted to investigate limitations in information availability and uncertainty estimation. The first experiment explored the effect of cognitive load on memory reliance for uncertainty estimation. The results show that cognitive load diminished reliance on memory, lowered expected uncertainty, and increased perceptions of environmental volatility. The second experiment assessed how outcome exposure conditions affect the ability to detect environmental changes, revealing differences in the mechanisms used for environmental change detection. The findings emphasize the importance of memory constraints in uncertainty estimation, highlighting how misestimation of uncertainties is influenced by individual experiences and the capacity of working memory (WM) to store relevant information. These insights contribute to understanding the role of WM in decision-making under uncertainty and provide a framework for exploring the dynamics of reinforcement learning in memory-limited systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Xin Lim & Rei Akaishi & Sébastien Hélie, 2025. "Memory Constraints in Uncertainty Misestimation: A Computational Model of Working Memory and Environmental Change Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2431-:d:1711877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/15/2431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/15/2431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. Robert C Wilson & Matthew R Nassar & Joshua I Gold, 2013. "A Mixture of Delta-Rules Approximation to Bayesian Inference in Change-Point Problems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D Daw, 2020. "A simple model for learning in volatile environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Nathaniel D. Daw & John P. O'Doherty & Peter Dayan & Ben Seymour & Raymond J. Dolan, 2006. "Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 876-879, June.
    5. Imen Bouhlel & Michela Chessa & Agnès Festré & Eric Guerci, 2019. "When to Stop? A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of an Individual Search Task," GREDEG Working Papers 2019-40, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    6. Elise Payzan-LeNestour & Peter Bossaerts, 2011. "Risk, Unexpected Uncertainty, and Estimation Uncertainty: Bayesian Learning in Unstable Settings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Jonas Simoens & Tom Verguts & Senne Braem, 2024. "Learning environment-specific learning rates," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D. Daw, 2021. "A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    3. Hu, Yingyao & Kayaba, Yutaka & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it!," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 215-231.
    4. John A Clithero & Dharol Tankersley & Scott A Huettel, 2008. "Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-6, November.
    5. Crystal Reeck & Xue Guo & Angelika Dimoka & Paul A. Pavlou, 2024. "Uncovering the Neural Processes of Privacy: A Neurally Informed Behavioral Intervention to Protect Information Privacy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 727-746, June.
    6. Robert C Wilson & Yael Niv, 2015. "Is Model Fitting Necessary for Model-Based fMRI?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Nazanin Mohammadi Sepahvand & Elisabeth Stöttinger & James Danckert & Britt Anderson, 2014. "Sequential Decisions: A Computational Comparison of Observational and Reinforcement Accounts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
    8. Bruno B Averbeck, 2015. "Theory of Choice in Bandit, Information Sampling and Foraging Tasks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2007. "With or Against the People? The Impact of a Bottom-Up Approach on Tax Morale and the Shadow Economy," CREMA Working Paper Series 2007-04, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    11. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    12. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    13. Giovanni Calice & Levent Kutlu & Ming Zeng, 2021. "Understanding US firm efficiency and its asset pricing implications," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 803-827, February.
    14. Westerhoff, Frank H. & Dieci, Roberto, 2006. "The effectiveness of Keynes-Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: A behavioral finance approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 293-322, February.
    15. José Castro Caldas & Helder Coelho, 1999. "The Origin of Institutions: Socio-Economic Processes, Choice, Norms and Conventions," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2(2), pages 1-1.
    16. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Ranganathan, Kavitha & Lejarraga, Tomás, 2021. "Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    18. Westerhoff Frank H., 2008. "The Use of Agent-Based Financial Market Models to Test the Effectiveness of Regulatory Policies," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 228(2-3), pages 195-227, April.
    19. Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & Daniel Martin, 2011. "Search and Satisficing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2899-2922, December.
    20. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2431-:d:1711877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.