IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i2p338-d1322808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposal of a Framework for Evaluating the Importance of Production and Maintenance Integration Supported by the Use of Ordinal Linguistic Fuzzy Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Díaz Cazañas

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Central University “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, 5 1/2 Km Camajuaní Road, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba)

  • Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino

    (Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Production Technologies, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 917 24 Trnava, Slovakia)

  • Estrella María De La Paz Martínez

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Central University “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, 5 1/2 Km Camajuaní Road, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba)

  • Jana Petru

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Carlos Daniel Díaz Tejeda

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Central University “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, 5 1/2 Km Camajuaní Road, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba)

Abstract

Over the years, the integration of Production Management and Maintenance Management has gained significant attention from the scientific community due to its benefits for the company. When searching through the states of the art and practice, it is possible to understand that one of the main challenges for the integration is the lack of systematic, methodological, and scientific approaches and evaluation systems that lead companies into a successful implementation and a clear understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the process. This paper introduces an original framework that conducts the processes of evaluation, weighting, and aggregation of set of novel indicators proposed by the authors. The main output of the proposal is an integral index that allows us to qualify, in a linguistic domain, the importance of the Production and Maintenance Management integration. At the same time, the proposed framework includes a methodology to evaluate the consensus of the experts, based on the use of linguistic terms with a membership function of the triangular type, which attempts to overcome some deficiencies of previous models identified by the authors in a detailed and complex analysis of the scientific literature. The proposed framework is applied in a plant of the Cuban mechanical industry. The results of this application are clearly presented and discussed, allowing us to verify and validate the proposal while also contributing to its ease of understanding and ultimately to the successful integration of the production and maintenance tasks in the given company.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Díaz Cazañas & Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino & Estrella María De La Paz Martínez & Jana Petru & Carlos Daniel Díaz Tejeda, 2024. "Proposal of a Framework for Evaluating the Importance of Production and Maintenance Integration Supported by the Use of Ordinal Linguistic Fuzzy Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:338-:d:1322808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swanson, Laura, 1997. "An empirical study of the relationship between production technology and maintenance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 191-207, November.
    2. Pinjala, Srinivas Kumar & Pintelon, Liliane & Vereecke, Ann, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 214-229, November.
    3. Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Gupta, Jatinder N.D., 2006. "Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 313-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    2. Janak Priyantha, 2021. "Literature Review: The Role of Organizational Factors in Maintenance Organizations Affecting Their Manufacturing Performance, From Sri Lankan Cultural Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(4), pages 353-366, April.
    3. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Auditing model for the introduction of computerised maintenance management system," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41.
    4. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    6. Faccio, M. & Persona, A. & Sgarbossa, F. & Zanin, G., 2014. "Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 85-93.
    7. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    8. Leppinen, Jussi & Punkka, Antti & Ekholm, Tommi & Salo, Ahti, 2025. "An optimization model for determining cost-efficient maintenance policies for multi-component systems with economic and structural dependencies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Dmitry BANNIKOV & Nina SIRINA & Alexander SMOLYANINOV, 2018. "Model Of The Maintenance And Repair System In Service Maintenance Management," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(3), pages 5-14, September.
    10. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    11. Delgado Sobrino Daynier Rolando & Díaz Cazañas Ronald & Ružarovský Roman & Holubek Radovan, 2018. "Integrative Programming of Production and Preventive Maintenance Tasks in an Environment of Identical Parallel Machines: Proposal of a Construction Heuristic," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 26(42), pages 127-134, June.
    12. Barberá, Luis & Crespo, Adolfo & Viveros, Pablo & Stegmaier, Raúl, 2014. "A case study of GAMM (graphical analysis for maintenance management) in the mining industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-120.
    13. Cipollini, Francesca & Oneto, Luca & Coraddu, Andrea & Murphy, Alan John & Anguita, Davide, 2018. "Condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion systems: Data analysis with minimal feedback," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 12-23.
    14. A. K. Muchiri & B. W. Ikua & P. N. Muchiri & P. K. Irungu & K. Kibicho, 2017. "An evaluation of maintenance practices in Kenya: preliminary results," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 990-1007, November.
    15. Berthaut, F. & Gharbi, A. & Dhouib, K., 2011. "Joint modified block replacement and production/inventory control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing cell," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 642-654, December.
    16. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    17. García Alcaraz Jorge Luis & Romero González Jaime & Noriega Morales Salvador, 2012. "El éxito del mantenimiento productivo total y su relación con los factores administrativos," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(4), pages 173-196, octubre-d.
    18. Traore, M. & Chammas, A. & Duviella, E., 2015. "Supervision and prognosis architecture based on dynamical classification method for the predictive maintenance of dynamical evolving systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-131.
    19. Chiara Franciosi & Yasamin Eslami & Mario Lezoche & Alexandre Voisin, 2025. "Ontologies for prognostics and health management of production systems: overview and research challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2223-2253, April.
    20. Ahmet Erkoyuncu, John & Khan, Samir & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal & Roy, Rajkumar, 2016. "A framework to estimate the cost of No-Fault Found events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 207-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:338-:d:1322808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.