IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/jisomg/v6y2012i2p378-388.html

Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Eugen Garais

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest)

Abstract

Maintenance processes are part of the life cycle of distributed applications, making it necessary to ensure their easy assistance after deployment of the application currently in use. On the basis of the recorded action is taken to assess the maintenance process and maintenance process as a whole. Record number of maintenance processes in the application management provides a basis for determining statistical study of the distribution and consumption of resources on the types of maintenance categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:jisomg:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:378-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/WI12/JISOM-WI12-A14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Gupta, Jatinder N.D., 2006. "Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 313-326, June.
    2. Daniel MICAN & Nicolae TOMAI & Robert Ioan COROS, 2009. "Web Content Management Systems, a Collaborative Environment in the Information Society," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 20-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:378-388 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    3. Leppinen, Jussi & Punkka, Antti & Ekholm, Tommi & Salo, Ahti, 2025. "An optimization model for determining cost-efficient maintenance policies for multi-component systems with economic and structural dependencies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    5. Barberá, Luis & Crespo, Adolfo & Viveros, Pablo & Stegmaier, Raúl, 2014. "A case study of GAMM (graphical analysis for maintenance management) in the mining industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-120.
    6. Berthaut, F. & Gharbi, A. & Dhouib, K., 2011. "Joint modified block replacement and production/inventory control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing cell," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 642-654, December.
    7. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Auditing model for the introduction of computerised maintenance management system," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41.
    8. Chiara Franciosi & Yasamin Eslami & Mario Lezoche & Alexandre Voisin, 2025. "Ontologies for prognostics and health management of production systems: overview and research challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2223-2253, April.
    9. Jamal Ahmed Hama Kareem & Kadhim Faraj Arif Saeed & Omar Mustafa Muhammad Faraj, 2019. "Maintenance Practices in Poor Uptime of Operating Equipment Toward Dynamic of Business Issues," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Maletič Damjan & Maletič Matjaž & Al-Najjar Basim & Gotzamani Katerina & Gianni Maria & Kalinowski T. Bartosz & Gomišček Boštjan, 2017. "Contingency Factors Influencing Implementation of Physical Asset Management Practices," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(1), pages 3-16, February.
    11. Ronald Díaz Cazañas & Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino & Estrella María De La Paz Martínez & Jana Petru & Carlos Daniel Díaz Tejeda, 2024. "Proposal of a Framework for Evaluating the Importance of Production and Maintenance Integration Supported by the Use of Ordinal Linguistic Fuzzy Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Romeo Margea, 2017. "Content Management Systems For Institutional Academic Websites. The Feaa Timisoara Experience," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 43-51, April.
    13. Hao Li & Shanghua Mi & Qifeng Li & Xiaoyu Wen & Dongping Qiao & Guofu Luo, 2020. "A scheduling optimization method for maintenance, repair and operations service resources of complex products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1673-1691, October.
    14. Pascual, R. & Godoy, D. & Louit, D.M., 2011. "Throughput centered prioritization of machines in transfer lines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1396-1401.
    15. Muller, Alexandre & Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Iung, Benoît, 2008. "On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1165-1187.
    16. Ishizaka, Alessio & Nemery, Philippe, 2014. "Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 45-59.
    17. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.
    18. Andreas Giannakoulopoulos & Minas Pergantis & Aristeidis Lamprogeorgos, 2024. "User Experience, Functionality and Aesthetics Evaluation in an Academic Multi-Site Web Ecosystem," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:jisomg:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:378-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.