IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i3p92-d1353608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Experience, Functionality and Aesthetics Evaluation in an Academic Multi-Site Web Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Giannakoulopoulos

    (Department of Audio and Visual Arts, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece)

  • Minas Pergantis

    (Department of Audio and Visual Arts, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece)

  • Aristeidis Lamprogeorgos

    (Department of Audio and Visual Arts, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece)

Abstract

The present study focuses on using qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate the functionality, user experience (UX), and aesthetic approach offered by an academic multi-site Web ecosystem consisting of multiple interconnected websites. Large entities in various industry fields often have the need for an elaborate Web presence. In an effort to address the challenges posed by this need specifically in the field of academia, the authors developed, over a period of many years, a multi-site ecosystem within the Ionian University, which focuses on interconnectivity and a collaborative approach to academic content management. This system, known as “Publish@Ionio”, uses a singular content management infrastructure to allow for the creation of content for different websites that share both information and resources while at the same time allowing for individual variations in both functionality and aesthetics. The ecosystem was evaluated through quantitative data from its operation and qualitative feedback from a focus-group interview with experts, including website editors and administrative staff. The collected data were used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the multi-site approach based on the actions and needs of the individuals in charge of generating content. The study led to conclusions on the advantages that interoperability offers in terms of digital and human resource management, the benefits of a unified aesthetic approach that allows for variability, and the necessity of collaborative content management tools that are tailored to the content’s nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Giannakoulopoulos & Minas Pergantis & Aristeidis Lamprogeorgos, 2024. "User Experience, Functionality and Aesthetics Evaluation in an Academic Multi-Site Web Ecosystem," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:92-:d:1353608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/3/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/3/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel MICAN & Nicolae TOMAI & Robert Ioan COROS, 2009. "Web Content Management Systems, a Collaborative Environment in the Information Society," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 20-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romeo Margea, 2017. "Content Management Systems For Institutional Academic Websites. The Feaa Timisoara Experience," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 43-51, April.
    2. Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:92-:d:1353608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.