IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i24p3931-d1543410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy and Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Author

Listed:
  • James J. H. Liou

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Bruce H. T. Guo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Sun-Weng Huang

    (Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 112303, Taiwan
    Institute of Urban Planning, College of Public Affairs, National Taipei University, New Taipei City 23741, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Tien Yang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

Abstract

In recent years, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has become an essential preventive tool widely applied across various fields. As a structured system analysis method, FMEA aids in identifying potential failure modes in product or process design, allowing for preventive measures to be taken in advance. However, traditional FMEA has certain limitations, as it does not comprehensively consider all potential failure factors. This study proposes an improved FMEA method that addresses these shortcomings by integrating it with a Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model, thereby enhancing the comprehensiveness of the assessment framework. Notably, this research introduces an economic risk factor—Expected Cost (EC)—to make the analysis results more aligned with real-world conditions. Additionally, to manage the uncertainty in expert opinions, this study applies Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers (IT2TFNs) and combines them with the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to calculate the weights of risk factors. Furthermore, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method is employed to explore the interrelationships between failure modes. Finally, the Multi-Attribute Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) method is used to rank risk factors, determining the priorities for improvement. This paper uses an air purifier as a case study to validate the effectiveness of the improved FMEA method, successfully addressing the shortcomings of traditional FMEA regarding uncertainty in expert opinions and the calculation of Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs). It provides a more practical and accurate risk assessment framework.

Suggested Citation

  • James J. H. Liou & Bruce H. T. Guo & Sun-Weng Huang & Yi-Tien Yang, 2024. "Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy and Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3931-:d:1543410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braga, Irina F.B. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Ferreira, João J.M. & Correia, Ricardo J.C. & Pereira, Leandro F. & Falcão, Pedro F., 2021. "A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Sheng-Li Si & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Ping Zhang, 2018. "DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-33, January.
    3. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Tavana, Madjid & Mina, Hassan & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2023. "A general Best-Worst method considering interdependency with application to innovation and technology assessment at NASA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Mahlet Demere Tadesse & Helen Zewdie Kine & Girma Gebresenbet & Lóránt Tavasszy & David Ljungberg, 2022. "Key Logistics Performance Indicators in Low-Income Countries: The Case of the Import–Export Chain in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Milena Lakicevic & Bojan Srdjevic, 2022. "An Approach to Developing the Multicriteria Optimal Forest Management Plan: The “Fruska Gora” National Park Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Witold Torbacki, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Mobility in the Szczecin Metropolitan Area in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The DEMATEL and PROMETHEE II Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Hui Zhao & Yuanyuan Ge & Jingqi Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation on the implementation effect of public participation in the decision-making of NIMBY facilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Nien-Ping Chen & Kao-Yi Shen & Chiung-Ju Liang, 2021. "Hybrid Decision Model for Evaluating Blockchain Business Strategy: A Bank’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhang, Hejie & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Ye, Cheng-Zhou & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi, 2022. "Evaluating smart office buildings from a sustainability perspective: A model of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Correia, Inês C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Zopounidis, Constantin & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F., 2024. "Urban expansion effects on real estate ecosystems: Identification and neutrosophic analysis of causal dynamics," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    11. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    16. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Juuso Pajasmaa & Kaisa Miettinen & Johanna Silvennoinen, 2025. "Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 329-371, April.
    19. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    20. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FMEA; IT2TFNs; BWM; DEMATEL; MAIRCA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3931-:d:1543410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.