IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i11p1764-d1409702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability Analysis of the Credit Market in Supply Chain Finance Based on Stochastic Evolutionary Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Chunsheng Wang

    (Digital Economy and Management School, Software Engineering Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510990, China
    Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Jiatong Weng

    (Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Jingshi He

    (Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Xiaopin Wang

    (Department of Electronics, Software Engineering Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510990, China)

  • Hong Ding

    (Digital Economy and Management School, Software Engineering Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510990, China)

  • Quanxin Zhu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of supply chain finance (SCF) has significantly alleviated the financing difficulties of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, it is important to recognize that within the accounts receivable financing segment of the SCF credit market, the credit risk associated with SMEs poses a serious challenge and potential threat to the stability, health, and sustainable development of the SCF system. This paper pays special attention to the stability of the two-party evolutionary game between SMEs and financial institutions (FIs) within the context of the Chinese SCF credit market. To identify a pathway to reduce credit risks for SMEs while simultaneously enhancing system stability, this paper adopts the stochastic evolutionary game (SEG) model and combines the fixed-point method to determine the conditions that satisfy the stability of the system’s index p mean square of the system. This study has made attempts in various aspects, such as the innovative construction and investigation of a nonlinear SEG model, the endeavor to study the stability of SEG systems using fixed-point methods, and the innovative construction of a more realistic two-player SEG system. The data and simulation results generated from hypothetical scenarios show that the conclusions of the article are credible and feasible. Through the study, we conclude that the higher credit ratio from FI and the higher penalty intensity from core enterprises (CEs) will accelerate the stability of the system. Based on solid data and modeling analysis, insights into the regulation of FI are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunsheng Wang & Jiatong Weng & Jingshi He & Xiaopin Wang & Hong Ding & Quanxin Zhu, 2024. "Stability Analysis of the Credit Market in Supply Chain Finance Based on Stochastic Evolutionary Game Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1764-:d:1409702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Du & Jiejie Li & Jiaxin Li & Weiduo Li, 2023. "Competition–cooperation mechanism of online supply chain finance based on a stochastic evolutionary game," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Igor V. Evstigneev & Thorsten Hens & Mohammad Javad Vanaei, 2022. "Evolutionary finance: A model with endogenous asset payoffs," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-96, Swiss Finance Institute, revised May 2023.
    3. Lee, Neil & Sameen, Hiba & Cowling, Marc, 2015. "Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the financial crisis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 370-380.
    4. Ferreira, Daniel & Li, Jin & Nikolowa, Radoslawa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 13493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    6. Wuttke, David A. & Blome, Constantin & Sebastian Heese, H. & Protopappa-Sieke, Margarita, 2016. "Supply chain finance: Optimal introduction and adoption decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 72-81.
    7. Indrajit Saha & Veeraruna Kavitha, 2023. "Systemic-Risk and Evolutionary Stable Strategies in a Financial Network," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 897-928, September.
    8. I. V. Evstigneev & T. Hens & M. J. Vanaei, 2023. "Evolutionary finance: a model with endogenous asset payoffs," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 117-143, August.
    9. Chakuu, Sumeer & Masi, Donato & Godsell, Janet, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between mechanisms, actors and instruments in supply chain finance: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 35-53.
    10. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaotong Zhou & Jianjun She & Cong Lu & Yuting Xie, 2025. "The Evolutionary Path of Value Co-Creation Behavior in Construction Projects Under the Construction Supply Chain Finance Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhiqiang & Wang, Qiang & Lai, Yin & Liang, Chaojie, 2020. "Drivers and outcomes of supply chain finance adoption: An empirical investigation in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Marak Zericho R. & Pillai Deepa, 2021. "Supply Chain Finance Factors: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 88-111, March.
    3. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Md Lutfur Rahman & Sudipta Bose, 2025. "Firm-level Climate Vulnerability and Corporate Risk-taking: International Evidence," Working Papers DP-2024-36, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    5. Jain, Richa & Reindorp, Matthew & Chockalingam, Arun, 2023. "Buyer-backed purchase-order financing for SME supplier with uncertain yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 758-772.
    6. Wei Zhong & Ling Jin, 2025. "The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Longjin Yu & Man Ji & Fazli Haleem & Yilong Gong & Yang Shen & Shaolong Zeng, 2024. "A Case Study on the Innovative Development of Digital Supply Chain Finance Based on MYbank in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    9. Nyakumwa, Blessing & Wadesango, Newman & Sitsha, Lovemore, 2023. "The Impact of Internal Audit Function on Corporate Governance: A Case of NSSA, Zimbabwe (2018-2022)," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 10(02), pages 01-09, September.
    10. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Mutee Ur Rahman & Faisal Abbas, 2025. "Exploring bank diversification and performance: evidence from South Asia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Weining Li & Ningyu Bei & Liebing Cao, 2025. "Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1860-1886, March.
    13. Li Mingqian, 2024. "Why Transaction Cost Economics Failed and How to Fix It," Papers 2405.09087, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    14. Angelo de Sousa Santarlacci & Humberto Angelo & Álvaro Nogueira de Souza & Maria de Fátima de Brito Lima & Maísa Santos Joaquim & Eder Pereira Miguel & Júlia de Oliveira Carneiro, 2024. "Benefit Sharing Governance Framework: Pathways for Financial Benefit Sharing in Traditional Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao, 2025. "Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 636-651, February.
    16. Chen, Sihua & Du, Jiangze & He, Wei & Siponen, Mikko, 2022. "Supply chain finance platform evaluation based on acceptability analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Sameer Al Johani & Adnan Atm, 2022. "Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm performance: Evidence from British Manufacturing Firms," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-32.
    18. Thong, Lik Hong, 2019. "A discussion on performance risk of Dunkin's Brand," MPRA Paper 97266, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Nov 2019.
    19. Dongshu Jiang & ZhiXing Ni & Yuxiu Chen & Xue Chen & Chaohong Na, 2022. "Influence of Financial Shared Services on the Corporate Debt Cost under Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Hyunah Lee, 2025. "Does ESG Performance Drive Firm-Level Innovation? Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1764-:d:1409702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.