IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i21p4492-d1270889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Envelopment Analysis Approaches for Multiperiod Two-Level Production and Distribution Planning Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiro Hayashida

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ichiro Nishizaki

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shinya Sekizaki

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan)

  • Junya Okabe

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan)

Abstract

This paper deals with two-level production and distribution planning problems in supply chain management where the leader is a distributor and the follower is a manufacturer. Assuming that the distributor can observe the input–output data in the production process, we formulated the data envelopment analysis (DEA) production problem corresponding to the production planning problem of the manufacturer. This paper proposes a novel data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to solve a challenging multiperiod two-level production and distribution planning problem in supply chain management. The innovative idea behind the proposed approach is to allow the distributor to observe the input–output data regarding the production activities of the manufacturer, even if the distributor cannot fully comprehend all parameters of the manufacturer’s production cost minimization problem. This approach addresses the challenge of uncertain demands by employing a two-stage model with simple recourse and considering the usage of the input–output data. The paper demonstrates the validity of the proposed DEA approaches through computational experiments and discusses the accuracy, reliability, and importance of the input–output data. The proposed approach provides a practical and effective solution to the multiperiod two-level production and distribution planning problem in supply chain management, and can help decision-makers improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations. The innovative idea of allowing the distributor to observe the input–output data about the production activities of the manufacturer is a significant contribution to the field of supply chain management and has the potential to advance the state of the art in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiro Hayashida & Ichiro Nishizaki & Shinya Sekizaki & Junya Okabe, 2023. "Data Envelopment Analysis Approaches for Multiperiod Two-Level Production and Distribution Planning Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4492-:d:1270889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manish Jain & Jason Tsai & James Pita & Christopher Kiekintveld & Shyamsunder Rathi & Milind Tambe & Fernando Ordóñez, 2010. "Software Assistants for Randomized Patrol Planning for the LAX Airport Police and the Federal Air Marshal Service," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 267-290, August.
    2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    3. J. Jiang & X. Liu, 2021. "Bayesian Stackelberg game model for water supply networks against interdictions with mixed strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 2537-2557, April.
    4. John C. Harsanyi, 1967. "Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players, I-III Part I. The Basic Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 159-182, November.
    5. Page Jr., Frank H., 1998. "Existence of optimal auctions in general environments," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 389-418, May.
    6. John C. Harsanyi, 1968. "Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players Part II. Bayesian Equilibrium Points," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 320-334, January.
    7. Yao, Z. & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Lai, K.K., 2008. "Manufacturer's revenue-sharing contract and retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 637-651, April.
    8. Shin, Youngchul & Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "Robust multiperiod inventory model considering trade-in program and refurbishment service: Implications to emerging markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Sarkar, Sumit, 2019. "Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: Models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 633-642.
    10. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    11. John C. Harsanyi, 1968. "Games with Incomplete Information Played by `Bayesian' Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(7), pages 486-502, March.
    12. Yunjian Xu & Katrina Ligett, 2018. "Commitment in first-price auctions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(2), pages 449-489, August.
    13. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    14. Nana Wan & Xu Chen, 2018. "Multiperiod Production and Ordering Policies for a Retailer-Led Supply Chain through Option Contracts," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishizaki, Ichiro & Hayashida, Tomohiro & Sekizaki, Shinya & Okabe, Junya, 2022. "Data envelopment analysis approaches for two-level production and distribution planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 255-268.
    2. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2004. "Configuration of Detection Software: A Comparison of Decision and Game Theory Approaches," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 131-148, September.
    3. Giovanni Paolo Crespi & Davide Radi & Matteo Rocca, 2017. "Robust games: theory and application to a Cournot duopoly model," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 177-198, November.
    4. Matata Ponyo Mapon & Jean-Paul K. Tsasa, 2019. "The artefact of the Natural Resources Curse," Papers 1911.09681, arXiv.org.
    5. Karthik N. Kannan, 2012. "Effects of Information Revelation Policies Under Cost Uncertainty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 75-92, March.
    6. Robert J. Aumann, 2005. "Musings on Information and Knowledge," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 2(1), pages 88-96, April.
    7. Xie, Yinxi & Xie, Yang, 2017. "Machiavellian experimentation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 685-711.
    8. von Wangenheim, Georg & Müller, Stephan, 2014. "Evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas: signaling internalized norms," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100340, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Derbyshire, James & Giovannetti, Emanuele, 2017. "Understanding the failure to understand New Product Development failures: Mitigating the uncertainty associated with innovating new products by combining scenario planning and forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 334-344.
    10. Zonderland, Maartje E. & Timmer, Judith, 2012. "Optimal allocation of MRI scan capacity among competing hospital departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 630-637.
    11. David Rios Insua & David Banks & Jesus Rios, 2016. "Modeling Opponents in Adversarial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 742-755, April.
    12. Güth, Werner & Pezanis-Christou, Paul, 2015. "Believing in correlated types in spite of independence: An indirect evolutionary analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-3.
    13. Elselt, H. A., 1998. "Perception and information in a competitive location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 94-105, July.
    14. Michael Perry & Hadi El-Amine, 2019. "Computational Efficiency in Multivariate Adversarial Risk Analysis Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 314-332, December.
    15. Bin Xie & David M. Dilts & Mikhael Shor, 2006. "The physician–patient relationship: the impact of patient‐obtained medical information," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 813-833, August.
    16. Garrouste, Christelle & Loi, Massimo, 2009. "Applications De La Theorie Des Jeux A L'Education: Pour Quels Types Et Niveaux D'Education, Quels Modeles, Quels Resultats? [Applications of Game Theory in Education - What Types and At What Levels," MPRA Paper 31825, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Arnaud Wolff, 2019. "On the Function of Beliefs in Strategic Social Interactions," Working Papers of BETA 2019-41, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    18. Richard Makadok & Jay B. Barney, 2001. "Strategic Factor Market Intelligence: An Application of Information Economics to Strategy Formulation and Competitor Intelligence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1621-1638, December.
    19. Sarkar, Sumit, 2019. "Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: Models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 633-642.
    20. Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike & Duan, Zhe & Poor, H. Vincent & Garnaev, Andrey, 2014. "Infrastructure security games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 469-478.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4492-:d:1270889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.