IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i20p3762-d940522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of CSR Practices for a Development Supply Chain in Alleviating Farmers’ Poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Qingyu Zhang

    (Research Institute of Business Analytics and Supply Chain Management, College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Tianlong Luo

    (Research Institute of Business Analytics and Supply Chain Management, College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

To alleviate farmer poverty, this paper investigates the effect of a retailer’s different socially responsible practices on a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one rural (poor) farmer, one suburban farmer, and one common retailer. Different from a commercial supply chain (whose members’ objectives are to maximize their profits) and a humanitarian supply chain (whose objective is to save more people, rather than to prioritize profits), the paper aims to study a development supply chain where the CSR-conscious retailer aims to lift the poor farmer out of poverty through cost sharing, altruistic practices, or fairness practices. Can the CSR-conscious retailer (and the development supply chain) do well by doing good? To answer the above question, four models of potential CSR investment are established and analyzed. Considering the different influences of the retailer’s CSR practices, this paper uses a Stackelberg game to analyze the decisions and profits of the farmers and the retailer in these four models. Our study finds that, first, the retailer’s CSR practices can improve the whole supply chain’s performance, which means that the supply chain has the potential to achieve the Pareto improvement for both the farmers and the retailer. Second, the retailer’s CSR practices yield benefits while implementing cost-sharing or fairness practices. Third, the rural farmer always benefits from the retailer’s CSR practices and may prefer the altruistic practice from which they can benefit the most. In addition, to benefit their profit more, the rural farmer should grow high- or low-value-added crops rather than medium-value-added ones. Fourth, from the suburban farmer’s perspective, the retailer’s CSR practices are not beneficial for their performance. However, the extent to which the suburban farmer’s performance decreases is much lower than the extent to which the rural farmer’s performance improves. The results of this paper might be used by stakeholders to alleviate poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingyu Zhang & Tianlong Luo, 2022. "Implications of CSR Practices for a Development Supply Chain in Alleviating Farmers’ Poverty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3762-:d:940522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2018. "Improving Consumer Welfare and Manufacturer Profit via Government Subsidy Programs: Subsidizing Consumers or Manufacturers?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 752-766, October.
    2. Yang, Jing & Xie, Jinxing & Deng, Xiaoxue & Xiong, Huachun, 2013. "Cooperative advertising in a distribution channel with fairness concerns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 401-407.
    3. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    4. Kolk, Ans & van Tulder, Rob, 2006. "Poverty alleviation as business strategy? Evaluating commitments of frontrunner Multinational Corporations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 789-801, May.
    5. Fei Xu & Honglei Wang, 2018. "Competitive–Cooperative Strategy Based on Altruistic Behavior for Dual-Channel Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    6. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Buttressing Supply Chains against Floods in Asia for Humanitarian Relief and Economic Recovery," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 938-950, June.
    7. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    8. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & Yuyan Wang & Xin Su & Hua Li & Rui Zhou, 2022. "Advertising Decisions of Platform Supply Chains Considering Network Externalities and Fairness Concerns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Puggioni, Daniela & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2019. "The value of being socially responsible: A primal-dual approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1090-1103.
    10. H. Holly Wang & Yanbing Wang & Michael S. Delgado, 2014. "The Transition to Modern Agriculture: Contract Farming in Developing Economies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1257-1271.
    11. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Supply-Chain Research Opportunities with the Poor as Suppliers or Distributors in Developing Countries," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(9), pages 1483-1494, September.
    12. Jaehyung An & Soo-Haeng Cho & Christopher S. Tang, 2015. "Aggregating Smallholder Farmers in Emerging Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1414-1429, September.
    13. Tang, Christopher S. & Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Formentini, Marco, 2016. "An analysis of partially-guaranteed-price contracts between farmers and agri-food companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1063-1073.
    14. Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Li, Jianbin, 2010. "Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1321-1326, December.
    15. Guan, Zhimin & Ye, Tong & Yin, Rui, 2020. "Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 916-930.
    16. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & ManMohan S. Sodhi & James Knuckles, 2020. "Optimal Subsidies for Development Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1131-1147, November.
    17. Xi Jiang & Jinsheng Zhou, 2021. "The Impact of Rebate Distribution on Fairness Concerns in Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    19. Christopher S. Tang & Yulan Wang & Ming Zhao, 2015. "The Implications of Utilizing Market Information and Adopting Agricultural Advice for Farmers in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1197-1215, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    2. Xiaolong Guo & Lihong Cheng & Yugang Yu, 2022. "Government subsidy policy for green and efficient raw materials considering farmer heterogeneity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4095-4112, November.
    3. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Tarun Jain & Jishnu Hazra & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Analysis of upstream pricing regulation and contract structure in an agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 85-122, January.
    5. Ni Du & Qinglan Han, 2018. "Pricing and Service Quality Guarantee Decisions in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Fairness Concern," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-41, October.
    6. Fang, Lei & Zhao, Sai, 2023. "On the green subsidies in a differentiated market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. Guo, Qiaozhen & He, Qiao-Chu & Chen, Ying-Ju & Huang, Wei, 2021. "Poverty mitigation via solar panel adoption: Smart contracts and targeted subsidy design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Jiguang Chen & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2021. "The Impact of Contract Farming on Agricultural Product Supply in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2395-2419, August.
    9. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & ManMohan S. Sodhi & James Knuckles, 2020. "Optimal Subsidies for Development Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1131-1147, November.
    10. Guo, Yan & Yu, Xinning & Zhou, Caifeng & Lyu, Gaoyan, 2021. "Government subsidies for preventing supply disruption when the supplier has an outside option under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Sushil Gupta & Hossein Rikhtehgar Berenji & Manish Shukla & Nagesh N. Murthy, 2023. "Opportunities in farming research from an operations management perspective," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1577-1596, June.
    12. Nilanjan Dutta & Arshinder Kaur, 2023. "Enabling socially responsible operations: A decision-making model for a firm contracting with decision-biased smallholders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 509-533, January.
    13. Liu, Zhi & Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liao, Chen-Nan & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "A novel cooperative game-based method to coordinate a sustainable supply chain under psychological uncertainty in fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Du, Shaofu & Nie, Tengfei & Chu, Chengbin & Yu, Yugang, 2014. "Reciprocal supply chain with intention," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 389-402.
    15. Wei Guangxing & Yao Yanling & Qin Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 283-294, June.
    16. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun & Perera, Sandun & Shi, Jim (Junmin), 2022. "Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Yoshihara, Rikuo & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2021. "Channel coordination between manufacturers and competing retailers with fairness concerns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 546-555.
    18. Luyi Gui & Christopher S. Tang & Shuya Yin, 2019. "Improving Microretailer and Consumer Welfare in Developing Economies: Replenishment Strategies and Market Entries," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 231-250, January.
    19. Guan, Zhimin & Ye, Tong & Yin, Rui, 2020. "Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 916-930.
    20. Sarkar, Sumit, 2019. "Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: Models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 633-642.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3762-:d:940522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.