IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i3p127-d1744334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

App-Based Logistics for Residual Biomass Recovery: Economic Feasibility in Fire Risk Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Bastos

    (DEGEIT, Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Laboratório Associado de Sistemas Inteligentes (LASI), Instituto de Engenharia Eletrónica e Informática de Aveiro (IEETA), Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Leonor Teixeira

    (DEGEIT, Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Laboratório Associado de Sistemas Inteligentes (LASI), Instituto de Engenharia Eletrónica e Informática de Aveiro (IEETA), Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Leonel J. R. Nunes

    (DEGEIT, Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    ESCE, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua da Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’ Alvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    PROMETHEUS, Unidade de Investigação em Materiais, Energia, Ambiente para a Sustentabilidade, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua da Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Alvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    CISAS, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua da Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Alvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

Abstract

Background : Rural fires, worsened by climate factors such as drought, biomass buildup, and ignition sources, threaten sustainability. Recovering residual biomass (RB) presents a promising way to lower fire risk by reducing fuel loads and generating renewable energy; however, logistical costs in the RB supply chain—due to poor stakeholder coordination—limit its feasibility. App-based models can help solve these issues by improving information sharing, but their economic viability remains largely unexplored. This study suggests that such models work well when large amounts of biomass are involved and moisture content is low. Still, they might need external incentives for widespread use and fire risk reduction. Methods : The study modeled recovery scenarios by comparing costs (harvesting, retrieval, transport, and pre-processing) with biomass market value, using expert inputs and sensitivity analysis on variables like fuel prices and wages. Results : The economic feasibility is possible for large volumes (e.g., 10-ton loads) with low moisture (<30%), allowing transportation distances up to 459 km; however, small-scale or high-moisture situations often are not viable without support. Conclusions : App-based models need external support, like subsidies, to overcome owner and RB challenges, ensuring effective fire mitigation and sustainability benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Bastos & Leonor Teixeira & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2025. "App-Based Logistics for Residual Biomass Recovery: Economic Feasibility in Fire Risk Mitigation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:127-:d:1744334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Sandim & Dalila Araújo & Teresa Fonseca & Maria Emília Silva, 2024. "Influence of Forest Management on the Sustainability of Community Areas in Northern Inland Portugal: A Simulated Case Study Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Petros Xepapadeas & Kostas Douvis & Ioannis Kapsomenakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Christos Zerefos, 2024. "Assessing the Link between Wildfires, Vulnerability, and Climate Change: Insights from the Regions of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.
    4. André Sandim & Maria Emília Silva & Paulo Fernandes & Teresa Fonseca, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainability and Yield in Maritime Pine Forests: Evaluating Silvicultural Models for Natural Regeneration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Moretti, Luca & Milani, Mario & Lozza, Giovanni Gustavo & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2021. "A detailed MILP formulation for the optimal design of advanced biofuel supply chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 159-175.
    6. Tiago Bastos & Leonor C. Teixeira & João C. O. Matias & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Agroforestry Biomass Recovery Supply Chain Management: A More Efficient Information Flow Model Based on a Web Platform," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Gérard, Maxence & Jayet, Pierre-Alain, 2023. "European farmers’ response to crop residue prices and implications for bioenergy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Giulio Raimondi & Gianluca Greco & Michele Ongis & Gabriele D’Antuono & Davide Lanni & Giuseppe Spazzafumo, 2024. "Techno-Economical Assessment for Combined Production of Hydrogen, Heat, and Power from Residual Lignocellulosic Agricultural Biomass in Huesca Province (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Giada La Scalia & Luca Adelfio & Concetta Manuela La Fata & Rosa Micale, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Power Plants in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Basile, Flavia & Pilotti, Lorenzo & Ugolini, Marco & Lozza, Giovanni & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2022. "Supply chain optimization and GHG emissions in biofuel production from forestry residues in Sweden," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 405-421.
    12. Tiago Florindo & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Residual Biomass Recovery in the Wine Sector: Creation of Value Chains for Vine Pruning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Isabel Malico & Ana Cristina Gonçalves, 2021. "Eucalyptus globulus Coppices in Portugal: Influence of Site and Percentage of Residues Collected for Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiago Bastos & João Matias & Leonel Nunes & Leonor Teixeira, 2025. "Technology for Boosting Sustainability: A Web App-Based Information Model for Boosting Residual Biomass Recovery," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Tiago Bastos & Leonel J. R. Nunes & Leonor Teixeira, 2025. "Smart Residual Biomass Supply Chain: A Digital Tool to Boost Energy Potential Recovery and Mitigate Rural Fire Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Wang, Guotao & Liao, Qi & Wang, Chang & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Multiperiod optimal planning of biofuel refueling stations: A bi-level game-theoretic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1152-1165.
    5. Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Pierre-Alain Jayet & Athanasios Petsakos & Raja Chakir & Anna Lungarska & Stéphane De Cara & Elvire Petel & Pierre Humblot & Caroline Godard & David Leclère & Pierre Cantelaube & Cyril Bourgeois & Mél, 2025. "The European agro-economic model AROPAj," Working Papers hal-04109872, HAL.
    7. Li, Zhengbing & Liang, Yongtu & Ni, Weilong & Liao, Qi & Xu, Ning & Li, Lichao & Zheng, Jianqin & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Pipesharing: economic-environmental benefits from transporting biofuels through multiproduct pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    8. Dwi Iryaning Handayani & Ilyas Masudin & Ahmad Rusdiansyah & Judi Suharsono, 2021. "Production-Distribution Model Considering Traceability and Carbon Emission: A Case Study of the Indonesian Canned Fish Food Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Adrian Ibric, 2025. "Digital Humanities for Increasing Disaster Resilience in Art Nouveau and Modernist Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-37, February.
    11. Thomas Gasperini & Elena Leoni & Daniele Duca & Carmine De Francesco & Giuseppe Toscano, 2024. "Monitoring of Woody Biomass Quality in Italy over a Five-Year Period to Support Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Ollier, Maxime & De Cara, Stéphane, 2024. "Give and take: An analysis of the distributional consequences of emission tax-and-rebate schemes with an application to greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    13. Aristide Giuliano & Heinz Stichnothe & Nicola Pierro & Isabella De Bari, 2024. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Territorial Case Studies for the Integration of Biorefineries and Green Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Bahmani, Pardis & Dehghani Sadrabadi, Mohammad Hossein & Makui, Ahmad & Jafari-Nodoushan, Abbasali, 2024. "An optimization-based design methodology to manage the sustainable biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain under disruptions: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Salini Chandrasekharan Nair & Vineetha John & Renu Geetha Bai & Timo Kikas, 2025. "Torrefaction of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Pathway to Renewable Energy, Circular Economy, and Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Fragkoulis Psathas & Paraskevas N. Georgiou & Athanasios Rentizelas, 2022. "Optimizing the Design of a Biomass-to-Biofuel Supply Chain Network Using a Decentralized Processing Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Seyedeh Azadeh Alavi-Borazjani & Shahzada Adeel & Valentina Chkoniya & Luís A. C. Tarelho, 2025. "Sustainability-Oriented Port Management: Biomass Gasification as a Strategic Tool for Green and Circular Maritime Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-32, March.
    18. Díaz-Trujillo, Luis Alberto & González-Avilés, Mauricio & Fuentes-Cortés, Luis Fabián, 2024. "Soft-clustering for conflict management around the water-energy-carbon nexus and energy security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    19. Stefan Cristian Galusnyak & Letitia Petrescu & Dora Andreea Chisalita & Calin-Cristian Cormos & Marco Ugolini, 2023. "From Secondary Biomass to Bio-Methanol through CONVERGE Technology: An Environmental Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Savelii Kukharets & Gennadii Golub & Marek Wrobel & Olena Sukmaniuk & Krzysztof Mudryk & Taras Hutsol & Algirdas Jasinskas & Marcin Jewiarz & Jonas Cesna & Iryna Horetska, 2022. "A Theoretical Model of the Gasification Rate of Biomass and Its Experimental Confirmation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:127-:d:1744334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.