IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v6y2017i3p49-d105866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenarios of Vegetable Demand vs. Production in Brazil: The Links between Nutritional Security and Small Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Camille L. Nolasco

    (Earth System Science Centre (CCST), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227, Brazil)

  • Luciana S. Soler

    (Earth System Science Centre (CCST), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227, Brazil)

  • Marcos W. D. Freitas

    (Department of Geography, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 4314902, Brazil)

  • Myanna Lahsen

    (Earth System Science Centre (CCST), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227, Brazil)

  • Jean P. H. B. Ometto

    (Earth System Science Centre (CCST), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227, Brazil)

Abstract

Dietary guidelines urge Brazilians to increase their consumption of raw vegetables. Yet key issues must be tackled by the government and civil society, not only to foster consumers’ appetite for healthier food, but more importantly to diminish the gaps between local demand and production, determined by food and land accessibility. We examine whether vegetable production in Brazil meets the demand to provide Brazilians the daily amount of fresh food recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). We developed demand scenarios in Brazil for 2008 and 2030, based on demand density maps built at the district level using production census surveys, household acquisition data, and population growth estimates. Results reveal an inherent inequality in vegetable consumption between the southern and central northern regions of Brazil that follows food insecurity regional indicators. Even in more urbanized regions and metropolitan areas, where the best balance between vegetable production and acquisition is found, simulated demand is far from WHO recommendations. A complementary discussion regarding land distribution and fresh food production supports our outlook on the weaknesses of existing rural policies for land reform and sustainable local fresh food production that directly affect demand and nutritional security. This work was the foundation to the Delivering Food Security on Limited Land (DEVIL) project in Brazil supported by Belmont Forum consortium.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille L. Nolasco & Luciana S. Soler & Marcos W. D. Freitas & Myanna Lahsen & Jean P. H. B. Ometto, 2017. "Scenarios of Vegetable Demand vs. Production in Brazil: The Links between Nutritional Security and Small Farming," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:49-:d:105866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/3/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/3/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Geni Satiko & Martins, Sonia Santana & De Carvalho, Yara Maria Chagas & Milani, Aline A. & Cunha, Rodrigo Pinheiro, 2006. "Fluxo De Comercialização De Hortaliças Produzidas Na Região Alto Cabeceiras Do Tietê," 44th Congress, July 23-27, 2006, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil 148149, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    2. Elizabeth Alice Clements & Bernardo Mançano Fernandes, 2013. "Land Grabbing, Agribusiness and the Peasantry in Brazil and Mozambique," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 2(1), pages 41-69, April.
    3. Matuschke, Ira, 2009. "Rapid Urbanization and Food Security: Using Food Density Maps to Identify Future Food Security Hotspots," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51643, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William J. McConnell & Andrés Viña, 2018. "Interactions between Food Security and Land Use in the Context of Global Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-3, April.
    2. Felix Haifeng Liao & Brendan Gordon & Colette DePhelps & Darin Saul & Chao Fan & Wenlong Feng, 2019. "A Land-Based and Spatial Assessment of Local Food Capacity in Northern Idaho, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shazia Kousar & Farhan Ahmed & Amber Pervaiz & Štefan Bojnec, 2021. "Food Insecurity, Population Growth, Urbanization and Water Availability: The Role of Government Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Greenhalgh, S. & Samarasinghe, O. & Curran-Cournane, F. & Wright, W. & Brown, P., 2017. "Using ecosystem services to underpin cost–benefit analysis: Is it a way to protect finite soil resources?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 1-14.
    3. Stavros Afionis & Lindsay C. Stringer & Nicola Favretto & Julia Tomei & Marcos S. Buckeridge, 2016. "Unpacking Brazil’s Leadership in the Global Biofuels Arena: Brazilian Ethanol Diplomacy in Africa," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 127-150, August.
    4. Sara M. Torres & Emilio F. Moran & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva, 2017. "Property Rights and the Soybean Revolution: Shaping How China and Brazil Are Telecoupled," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    6. Sylvia Szabo, 2016. "Urbanisation and Food Insecurity Risks: Assessing the Role of Human Development," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 28-48, January.
    7. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zeng, Mingli & Luo, Kang, 2023. "Food security and digital economy in China: A pathway towards sustainable development," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1106-1125.
    8. Abass, Kabila & Adanu, Selase Kofi & Agyemang, Seth, 2018. "Peri-urbanisation and loss of arable land in Kumasi Metropolis in three decades: Evidence from remote sensing image analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 470-479.
    9. Helen & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2020. "Ecosystem Services Provision from Urban Farms in a Secondary City of Myanmar, Pyin Oo Lwin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Mastewal Yami & Shiferaw Feleke & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Arega D. Alene & Zoumana Bamba & Victor Manyong, 2019. "African Rural Youth Engagement in Agribusiness: Achievements, Limitations, and Lessons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Besfat Dejen Engdaw & Melaku Debas Kebede, 2018. "The Impact of urbanization on Food in Security in Amhara Regional State Metropolitan cities," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 2(3), pages 39-49, December.
    12. Camacho, Rodrigo Simão & Sobreiro Filho, José & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Mariano, Enzo Barberio, 2016. "Evaluation of the relationship between education and sustainability in peasant movements: The experience of the National Education Program in Agrarian Reform," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 152-161.
    13. Sophie de Bruin & Just Denerink & Pritpal Randhawa & Idrissa Wade & Hester Biemans & Christian Siderius, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 71: Urbanizing food systems: exploring opportunities for rural transformation," IFAD Research Series 320721, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    14. Eduardo Gomes, 2020. "Sustainable Population Growth in Low-Density Areas in a New Technological Era: Prospective Thinking on How to Support Planning Policies Using Complex Spatial Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Carolina Milhorance & Marcel Bursztyn, 2017. "South-South civil society partnerships: renewed ties of political contention and policy building," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 80-95, October.
    16. Bonaiti, Gabriele & Fipps, Guy, 2016. "Methodology for quantifying impacts of urbanization on the water distribution networks of irrigation districts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 270-279.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:49-:d:105866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.