IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1359-d1688400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revalorization of Vinasse as a Farmland Improver Through Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms: A Circular Economy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Aarón Montiel-Rosales

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Misantla, Km 1.8 Carretera a Loma del Cojolite, Misantla 93850, Veracruz, Mexico
    Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Teziutlán, Fracción l y ll S/N Aire Libre, Teziutlan 73960, Puebla, Mexico)

  • Nayeli Montalvo-Romero

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Misantla, Km 1.8 Carretera a Loma del Cojolite, Misantla 93850, Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Gregorio Fernández-Lambert

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Misantla, Km 1.8 Carretera a Loma del Cojolite, Misantla 93850, Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Horacio Bautista-Santos

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Tantoyuca, Camino Lindero Tametate S/N Col. La Morita, Tantoyuca 92100, Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Yair Romero-Romero

    (Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI)/Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. (CIATEJ), Av. Normalistas 800 Colinas de La Normal, Guadalajara 44270, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Juan Manuel Carrión-Delgado

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Xalapa Campus Xalapa, División de Ingeniería Industrial, Sección 5A Reserva Territorial S/N Santa Bárbara Col. Santa Bárbara, Xalapa 91096, Veracruz, Mexico
    El Colegio de Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto 26 Zona Centro, Xalapa-Enríquez 91000, Veracruz, Mexico)

Abstract

Vinasse is a waste generated from the sugarcane ethanol production process. It is an effluent that, when discharged into the environment, causes serious damage. This study evaluated the potential of vinasse as a regenerator of agricultural soil through Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms (MOGAs). This study focused on optimizing the amount of vinasse that should be applied, depending on its composition and the needs of the agricultural land. The methodology included five phases where the properties of the cultivated land with and without vinasse were evaluated; with the experimental data, MOGAs were constructed to evaluate soil: (a) fertility, (b) quality, and (c) health. The vinasse was characterized; meanwhile, to understand how the soil behaves depending on the incorporation of vinasse, a factorial experiment was designed in soils where sugarcane is grown in Mexico. The models were built and optimized using MATLAB ® and evaluated using Pareto Front. This study showed that vinasse improved soil fertility, quality, and health, with an optimal ratio of mixture formed by 40% vinasse and 60% irrigation water. This ratio allows the development of appropriate soil conditions for the growth of the crop—this is achieved after the application of the vinasse during the preparation of the land for cultivation, which is reached at approximately 20 cm depth—(a) fertility with K of 150 to 230 mg/kg, P of 25 to 35 mg/kg, and N of 17 to 19 mg/kg; (b) quality with MC of 90 to 95%, OM of 3.5 to 4%, and pH of 6.5 to 7.5 UpH; and (c) health with equity of 78% to 80%, abundance of 75% to 80%, and diversity of 80% to 95%. A comparative analysis between an experimental field with and without vinasse showed a 24% increase (ton/ha) in sugarcane yield. The value of vinasse is highlighted, not only as a waste to be treated, but as a regenerative input aligned with the Circular Economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aarón Montiel-Rosales & Nayeli Montalvo-Romero & Gregorio Fernández-Lambert & Horacio Bautista-Santos & Yair Romero-Romero & Juan Manuel Carrión-Delgado, 2025. "Revalorization of Vinasse as a Farmland Improver Through Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms: A Circular Economy Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1359-:d:1688400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cortes-Rodríguez, Edgar Fernando & Fukushima, Nilton Asao & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A., 2018. "Vinasse concentration and juice evaporation system integrated to the conventional ethanol production process from sugarcane – Heat integration and impacts in cogeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 474-488.
    2. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu, 2021. "Soil Health Evaluation of Farmland Based on Functional Soil Management—A Case Study of Yixing City, Jiangsu Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Zakir Hussain & Limei Deng & Xuan Wang & Rongyang Cui & Gangcai Liu, 2022. "A Review of Farmland Soil Health Assessment Methods: Current Status and a Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Domenico Prisa & Roberto Fresco & Damiano Spagnuolo, 2023. "Microbial Biofertilisers in Plant Production and Resistance: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xigui Li & Qing Wu & Yujie Liu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Cultivated Land System Health Based on PSR-VOR Model—A Case Study of the Two Lake Plains, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Cong Xu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Min Xia, 2021. "Potential Ecological Risks of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soil Alongside Highways and Their Relationship with Landscape," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Long Kang & Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Zhe Feng & Huafu Zhao & Sicheng Zhang, 2023. "Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Biological Indicators in Typical Farmland Soils," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Botshekan, Maryam & Moheb, Ahmad & Vatankhah, Fatemeh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Shafiei, Marzieh, 2022. "Energy saving alternatives for renewable ethanol production with the focus on separation/purification units: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    5. Kun Zeng & Xiong Duan & Bin Chen & Lanxi Jia, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Eco-Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use and Its Influencing Factors: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Aarón Montiel-Rosales & Nayeli Montalvo-Romero & Luis Enrique García-Santamaría & Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo & Horacio Bautista-Santos & Gregorio Fernández-Lambert, 2022. "Post-Industrial Use of Sugarcane Ethanol Vinasse: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Abdul Munaf Mohamed Irfeey & Mohamed M. M. Najim & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Abou Traore, 2023. "Groundwater Pollution Impact on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Hidalgo, D. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M. & Corona, F., 2019. "A multi-waste management concept as a basis towards a circular economy model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 481-489.
    9. Yinghua Lin & Fengjun Jin & Li Ma & Jianwei Meng, 2023. "Measurements and Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    10. David D. J. Antia, 2023. "Desalination of Saline Irrigation Water Using Hydrophobic, Metal–Polymer Hydrogels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Jacek Pranagal & Sławomir Ligęza & Joanna Gmitrowicz-Iwan, 2023. "The Impact of Mining Waste and Biogas Digestate Addition on the Durability of Soil Aggregates," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Sara Marinari & Emanuele Radicetti & Roberto Mancinelli, 2022. "Soil Quality and Health to Assess Agro-Ecosystems Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-4, May.
    13. Feng Xu & Guangqing Chi & Yongheng Rao & Jianjun Zhang, 2022. "Editorial for Special Issue “Land Use Change and Anthropogenic Disturbances: Relationships, Interactions, and Management”," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-6, September.
    14. Palacios-Bereche, Milagros Cecilia & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Nebra, Silvia Azucena, 2020. "Comparison through energy, exergy and economic analyses of two alternatives for the energy exploitation of vinasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Zhang, Han & Zheng, Jinhui & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhao, Shikuan & Bouri, Elie, 2024. "How does urban land use efficiency improve resource and environment carrying capacity?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Nakashima, R.N. & de Oliveira Junior, S., 2020. "Comparative exergy assessment of vinasse disposal alternatives: Concentration, anaerobic digestion and fertirrigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1969-1978.
    17. Dong Li, 2024. "Sustainable Ecosystems and the Economics of State Ownership: A Three-Stage Structural Framework and Innovative Insights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11090-11127, September.
    18. Kristia Kristia & Sándor Kovács & Zoltán Bács & Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    19. José Manuel Mirás-Avalos & Pedro Marco & Sergio Sánchez & Beatriz Bielsa & María José Rubio Cabetas & Vicente González, 2022. "Soil Quality Index of Young and Differently Managed Almond Orchards under Mediterranean Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Huanyu Chang & Yong Zhao & Yongqiang Cao & He Ren & Jiaqi Yao & Rong Liu & Wei Li, 2025. "Evaluating Coupling Security and Joint Risks in Northeast China Agricultural Systems Based on Copula Functions and the Rel–Cor–Res Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1359-:d:1688400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.