IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p571-d1608216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Forest Carbon Sequestration in China Under Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Mingli Qiu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yuxin Zhao

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Dianfeng Liu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Digital Cartography and Land Information Application Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430079, China
    Hubei Luojia Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Understanding how climate policies impact forest carbon sequestration is crucial for optimizing mitigation strategies. This study evaluated forest carbon sequestration in China from 2020 to 2060 under three climate scenarios: SSP1-2.6 (high mitigation), SSP3-7.0 (limited mitigation), and SSP5-8.5 (no mitigation). We integrated the land-use harmonization (LUH2) and patch-generating land-use simulation (PLUS) models to project forest cover change, and the Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed land (LPJmL) model to simulate carbon dynamics. The results showed stronger mitigation efforts led to higher sequestration, with annual rates of 0.49, 0.48, and 0.20 Pg yr −1 across the scenarios. SSP1-2.6 achieved the highest carbon density (17.75 kg m −2 ) and sequestration (56.95 Pg), driven by the greatest increases in the carbon density of existing forests (+41.56%) and soil carbon (+39.94%). SSP3-7.0, despite the highest forest cover (34.74%), had a lower carbon density (17.19 kg m −2 ) and sequestration (56.84 Pg). SSP5-8.5 recorded the lowest forest cover (27.12%) and sequestration (45.62 Pg). Increasing carbon density, rather than expanding forest area, could be more effective for carbon sequestration in China. The carbon density and annual sequestration in existing forests were 2.36 and 2.89 times higher than in new forests. We recommend prioritizing SSP1-2.6 to maximize sequestration, focusing on protecting southwest forests and soil carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingli Qiu & Yuxin Zhao & Dianfeng Liu, 2025. "Assessing Forest Carbon Sequestration in China Under Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:571-:d:1608216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/571/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/571/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William R.L. Anderegg & Anna T. Trugman & Grayson Badgley & Christa M. Anderson & Ann M. Bartuska & Philippe Ciais & Danny Cullenward & Christopher B. Field & Jeremy Freeman & Scott J. Goetz & Jeffrey, 2020. "Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests," Post-Print hal-02883164, HAL.
    2. Liu, Dianfeng & Li, Fuxiang & Qiu, Mingli & Zhang, Yang & Zhao, Xiang & He, Jianhua, 2024. "An integrated framework for measuring sustainable rural development towards the SDGs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Bernardo B. N. Strassburg & Alvaro Iribarrem & Hawthorne L. Beyer & Carlos Leandro Cordeiro & Renato Crouzeilles & Catarina C. Jakovac & André Braga Junqueira & Eduardo Lacerda & Agnieszka E. Latawiec, 2020. "Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7831), pages 724-729, October.
    4. Hideo Shiogama & Shinichiro Fujimori & Tomoko Hasegawa & Michiya Hayashi & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Tomoo Ogura & Toshichika Iizumi & Kiyoshi Takahashi & Toshihiko Takemura, 2023. "Important distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 for use in impact assessments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(12), pages 1276-1278, December.
    5. Alexander Koch & Jed O. Kaplan, 2022. "Tropical forest restoration under future climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(3), pages 279-283, March.
    6. Qin Nie & Wang Man & Zongmei Li & Xuewen Wu, 2025. "From Policy to Practice: Assessing Carbon Storage in Fujian Province Using Patch-Generating Land Use Simulation and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gyumin Lee & Hyunjung Kim & Kyoungwon Min & Taemun Hwang & Eunju Kim & Juwon Lee & Doosun Kang, 2025. "Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Urban Water Sectors: A Case Study in Incheon Metropolitan City, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Kobayashi, Yuta & Sato, Masayuki & Uchida, Kei & Mori, Akira S., 2025. "Misalignment between ecologically rapid and economically optimal forest restoration designs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Latinovic, Zoran & Chatterjee, Sharmila C., 2024. "Value co-creation: Balancing B2B platform value and potential reverse-value effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Vera, Ivan & Wicke, Birka & Lamers, Patrick & Cowie, Annette & Repo, Anna & Heukels, Bas & Zumpf, Colleen & Styles, David & Parish, Esther & Cherubini, Francesco & Berndes, Göran & Jager, Henriette & , 2022. "Land use for bioenergy: Synergies and trade-offs between sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Rana, Pushpendra & Fleischman, Forrest & Ramprasad, Vijay & Lee, Kangjae, 2022. "Predicting wasteful spending in tree planting programs in Indian Himalaya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. D. P. Costa, Micheli & Wartman, Melissa & Macreadie, Peter I. & Ferns, Lawrance W. & Holden, Rhiannon L. & Ierodiaconou, Daniel & MacDonald, Kimberley J. & Mazor, Tessa K. & Morris, Rebecca & Nicholso, 2024. "Spatially explicit ecosystem accounts for coastal wetland restoration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Cristina Martínez-Garza & Eliane Ceccon & Moisés Méndez-Toribio, 2022. "Ecological and Social Limitations for Mexican Dry Forest Restoration: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Grubert, E. & Zacarias, M., 2022. "Paradigm shifts for environmental assessment of decarbonizing energy systems: Emerging dominance of embodied impacts and design-oriented decision support needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Callesen, I. & Magnussen, A., 2021. "TransparC2U–A two-pool, pedology oriented forest soil carbon simulation model aimed at user investigations of multiple uncertainties," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 453(C).
    10. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Cerasela Pîrvu & Ramona Pîrvu & Cristian Mihai Cismaș & Melinda Petronela Costin, 2024. "The Road to 2030: Evaluating Europe’s Progress on Sustainable Ecosystem Protection and Restoration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Yanping Zhao & Jing Luo & Tao Li & Jian Chen & Yi Mi & Kuan Wang, 2023. "A Framework to Identify Priority Areas for Restoration: Integrating Human Demand and Ecosystem Services in Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Sarah M. Anderson & Linda S. Heath & Marla R. Emery & Jeffrey A. Hicke & Jeremy S. Littell & Alan Lucier & Jeffrey G. Masek & David L. Peterson & Richard Pouyat & Kevin M. Potter & Guy Robertson & Jin, 2021. "Developing a set of indicators to identify, monitor, and track impacts and change in forests of the United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Andrea Duane & Marc Castellnou & Lluís Brotons, 2021. "Towards a comprehensive look at global drivers of novel extreme wildfire events," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Pan, Quan & Wen, Zhi & Wu, Tong & Zheng, Tianchen & Yang, Yanzheng & Li, Ruonan & Zheng, Hua, 2022. "Trade-offs and synergies of forest ecosystem services from the perspective of plant functional traits: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Xiaojuan Xu & Fusheng Jiao & Dayi Lin & Jing Liu & Kun Zhang & Ruozhu Yang & Naifeng Lin & Changxin Zou, 2023. "Carbon Sink Trends in the Karst Regions of Southwest China: Impacts of Ecological Restoration and Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Pinnschmidt, Arne & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Nölte, Anja & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2023. "Tropical mixed-species plantations can outperform monocultures in terms of carbon sequestration and economic return," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    17. Li, Bingbing & Yang, Yi & Li, Zhi, 2021. "Combined effects of multiple factors on spatiotemporally varied soil moisture in China’s Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    18. Martin, Tess & Hervias, Alexandra & Armoiry, Xavier & Martelli, Nicolas, 2024. "Early access programs for medical devices in France: Overview of recent reforms and outcomes (2015-2022)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Shuangfei Zhao & Wei Zeng & Qian Yang & Rong Zheng, 2025. "Research on the Driving Factors and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Woodland Ecosystem Services in Zhangjiajie City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Shen, Jiake & Zhu, Wenjia & Peng, Zhenwei & Wang, Yuncai, 2023. "Improving landscape ecological network connectivity in urbanizing areas from dual dimensions of structure and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:571-:d:1608216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.