IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2045-d1770284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Potential Demand for Urban Parks Using Long-Term Population Projections

Author

Listed:
  • Daeho Kim

    (Department of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Yoonji Kim

    (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun Chan Sung

    (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Seongwoo Jeon

    (Department of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In the Republic of Korea, the problems of low birth rate and population aging are accelerating population decline at the regional level, leading to the phenomena of local extinction and urban shrinkage. These phenomena, coupled with the projected nationwide population decline, pose a fundamental threat to the sustainability of essential infrastructure such as urban parks. The conventional growth-oriented paradigm of urban planning has shown clear limitations in quantitatively forecasting future demand, constraining proactive management strategies for the era of population decline. To address this gap, this study develops a policy-decision-support framework that integrates long-term population projections, grid-based population data, the DEGURBA urban classification system—a global standard for delineating urban and rural areas— and network-based accessibility analysis. For the entire Republic of Korea, we (1) constructed a 1 km resolution time-series population dataset for 2022–2072; (2) applied DEGURBA to quantify transitions among urban, semi-urban, and rural types; and (3) assessed changes in potential user populations within the defined service catchments. The results indicate that while population concentration in the Seoul Capital Area persists, under the low-variant scenario, a projected average decline of 40% in potential user populations by 2072 will lead to significant functional changes, with 53.6% of municipalities nationwide transitioning to “semi-urban” or “rural” areas. This spatial shift is projected to decrease the proportion of urban parks located in “urban” areas from 83.3% to 75.0%, while the total potential user population is expected to plummet from approximately 44.4 million to 25.8 million, a 42.0% reduction. This study underscores the need for urban park policy to move beyond quantitative expansion and toward quality-oriented management based on selection and concentration. By uniquely integrating long-term demographic scenarios, the Degree of Urbanization (DEGURBA), and spatial accessibility analysis, this study provides a foundational scientific basis for forecasting future demand and supports the formulation of sustainable, data-driven strategies for urban park restructuring under conditions of demographic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Daeho Kim & Yoonji Kim & Hyun Chan Sung & Seongwoo Jeon, 2025. "A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Potential Demand for Urban Parks Using Long-Term Population Projections," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-33, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2045-:d:1770284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxwell Hartt, 2018. "The diversity of North American shrinking cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2946-2959, October.
    2. Leiting Cen & Yang Xiao, 2025. "Assessing Urban Park Accessibility via Population Projections: Planning for Green Equity in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Sungdon Kim & Youngmi Lee & Haejune Oh, 2025. "Estimation of Gridded Population with Spatial Downscaling in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Rupprecht, Christoph, 2017. "Informal urban green space: Residents’ perception, use, and management preferences across four major Japanese shrinking cities," SocArXiv ug86b, Center for Open Science.
    5. Gianni Carbonaro & Eugenio Leanza & Philip McCann & Francesca Medda, 2018. "Demographic Decline, Population Aging, and Modern Financial Approaches to Urban Policy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 210-232, March.
    6. Moreno-Monroy, Ana I. & Schiavina, Marcello & Veneri, Paolo, 2021. "Metropolitan areas in the world. Delineation and population trends," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.
    8. Thorsten Wiechmann & Karina M. Pallagst, 2012. "Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A Comparison of Transformation Patterns and Local Strategies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 261-280, March.
    9. M. Francisca Lima & Catharine Ward Thompson & Peter Aspinall, 2020. "Friendly Communities and Outdoor Spaces in Contexts of Urban Population Decline," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Youngmee Jeon & Saehoon Kim, 2020. "Housing abandonment in shrinking cities of East Asia: Case study in Incheon, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1749-1767, June.
    3. Zezhou Wu & Danting Zhang & Shenghan Li & Jianbo Fei & Changhong Chen & Bin Tian & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari, 2022. "Visualizing and Understanding Shrinking Cities and Towns (SCT) Research: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Tingting Chen & Zhoutong Wu & Wei Lang, 2025. "Understanding Urban Growth and Shrinkage: A Study of the Modern Manufacturing City of Dongguan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Xiaoming Ding & Shangkun Yu & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang & Zhenxing Jin, 2022. "Types, Modes and Influencing Factors of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Andrea Sarzynski & Thomas J. Vicino, 2019. "Shrinking Suburbs: Analyzing the Decline of American Suburban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Weijun Yu & Siyu Zhang & Entao Pang & Huihui Wang & Yunsong Yang & Yuhao Zhong & Tian Jing & Hongguang Zou, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution Mechanism and Spatial Correlation Network Effect of Resilience in Different Shrinking Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Chin, Jae Teuk, 2021. "The shifting role of public–private partnerships in vacant property redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Wenshi Yang & Fan Chen & Qianqian Wei & Zhenwei Peng, 2024. "Relationships between Resident Activities and Physical Space in Shrinking Cities in China—The Case of Chaoyang City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Daniela D’Alessandro & Andrea Rebecchi & Letizia Appolloni & Andrea Brambilla & Silvio Brusaferro & Maddalena Buffoli & Maurizio Carta & Alessandra Casuccio & Liliana Coppola & Maria Vittoria Corazza , 2023. "Re-Thinking the Environment, Cities, and Living Spaces for Public Health Purposes, According with the COVID-19 Lesson: The LVII Erice Charter," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Xiaochun Zhao & Xiaodan Nie, 2025. "The Impact of Urban Shrinkage on Carbon Emission Intensity and Its Spatial Spillover Effects," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Liu, Xingjian & Wang, Mingshu & Qiang, Wei & Wu, Kang & Wang, Xiaomi, 2020. "Urban form, shrinking cities, and residential carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese city-regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Maria Pacheco & Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2024. "Examining Post-Pandemic Urban Transformations: A Literature Review on COVID-19’s Influence on Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    15. Bander Fahad Alkrides & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb & Debra Cushing, 2025. "Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Neil Lee & Cornelius Lipp, 2021. "Golfing with Trump. Social capital, decline, inequality, and the rise of populism in the US," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 457-481.
    18. Guo, Shan & Tian, Tian & Gong, Bei & Wan, Yaohua & Zhou, Jason Xin & Wu, Xiaofang, 2025. "Urban shrinkage and carbon emissions: Demand-side accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    19. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Patrizia Sulis & Paola Proietti, 2024. "Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1650-1665, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2045-:d:1770284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.