IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5748-d1684980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • Bander Fahad Alkrides

    (Riyadh Region Municipality, P.O. Box 2770, Riyadh 11146, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tracy Washington

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Mark Limb

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Debra Cushing

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

Abstract

Urban sustainability is closely linked to walkability, as it impacts social interaction, public health, and economic development. In megacities like Riyadh, where automobiles dominate mobility, the development of pedestrian infrastructure remains inadequate. An online survey was conducted through public sampling to evaluate walking conditions in central Riyadh’s commercial districts. The 302 participants evaluated 49 critical walkability indicators to determine their significance and satisfaction with the current conditions. Gap analysis and a displeasure measurement framework identified pedestrian challenges. Participants acknowledged the importance of walkability aspects but expressed strong dissatisfaction with existing conditions. Key barriers to pedestrian comfort included inadequate facilities, environmental discomfort, weak safety measures, and cultural driving preferences. The study highlighted crucial walkability issues requiring improvement, such as public toilets, shaded pathways, air quality, and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure. The findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions in Riyadh’s commercial districts to enhance pedestrian accessibility and comfort, to promote urban sustainability through improved walkability. This study offers a methodological advancement by combining Relative Importance Index, gap analysis, and a novel disgruntlement measurement framework to assess walkability. The use of 49 Delphi-derived indicators contextualized within a GCC megacity adds a unique perspective to urban sustainability research. The findings inform both local policy and global urban studies by demonstrating how culturally and climatically adaptive walkability metrics can guide equitable, data-driven interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bander Fahad Alkrides & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb & Debra Cushing, 2025. "Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5748-:d:1684980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eun Jung Kim & Jiyeong Kim & Hyunjung Kim, 2020. "Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation: A Correlation Study in Leisure and Shopping Purposes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.
    3. Bander Fahad Alkrides, 2025. "Promoting Sustainable Urban Walkability: A Modified Delphi Study on Key Indicators for Urban Walkability in Gulf Cooperation Council Urban Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-34, February.
    4. Mohammed Aloshan & Moustafa Gharieb & Khaled Mahmoud Heba & Ragab Khalil & Mohammed Humaid Alhumaid & Mohamed Salah Ezz, 2024. "Promoting Urban Corridors in Saudi City Center to Enhance Walkability Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Majd Homoud & Ola M. Jarrar, 2024. "Walkability in Riyadh: A Comprehensive Assessment and Implications for Sustainable Community—Al-Falah Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Daniela D’Alessandro & Andrea Rebecchi & Letizia Appolloni & Andrea Brambilla & Silvio Brusaferro & Maddalena Buffoli & Maurizio Carta & Alessandra Casuccio & Liliana Coppola & Maria Vittoria Corazza , 2023. "Re-Thinking the Environment, Cities, and Living Spaces for Public Health Purposes, According with the COVID-19 Lesson: The LVII Erice Charter," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Maria Pacheco & Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2024. "Examining Post-Pandemic Urban Transformations: A Literature Review on COVID-19’s Influence on Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    4. Patrizia Sulis & Paola Proietti, 2024. "Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1650-1665, September.
    5. Beatrice Maria Bellè & Alessandro Deserti, 2024. "Urban Greening Plans: A Potential Device towards a Sustainable and Co-Produced Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Saveria Olga Murielle Boulanger, 2024. "Smart City and Energy: A Bibliometric Review of the Smart City and Smart Energy Concept from the Perspective of the Bioclimatic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    8. Goyette, Jean-Olivier & Mendes, Poliana & Cimon-Morin, Jérôme & Dupras, Jérôme & Pellerin, Stéphanie & Rousseau, Alain N. & Poulin, Monique, 2024. "Using the ecosystem serviceshed concept in conservation planning for more equitable outcomes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Colaço, Rui & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2022. "Exploring the e-shopping geography of Lisbon: Assessing online shopping adoption for retail purchases and food deliveries using a 7-day shopping survey," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Xu Lu & Mengqin Zhu & Zeting Li & Qingyu Li & Shan Huang, 2025. "Urban Renewal Strategy Guided by Rail Transit Development Based on the “Node–Place–Revenue” Model: Case Study of Shenyang Metro Line 1," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Benassai-Dalmau, Robert & Borge-Holthoefer, Javier & Solé-Ribalta, Albert, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian permeability in urban sidewalk networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Chen, Lu & Liu, Xiuyan & Sun, Tianshi & Ma, Ning & Zhang, Ting, 2025. "Compact urban morphology and the 15-minute city: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    14. Patrícia C. Melo, 2022. "Will COVID‐19 hinder or aid the transition to sustainable urban mobility? Spotlight on Portugal's largest urban agglomeration," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S1), pages 80-106, November.
    15. Hadi Alizadeh & Abolfazl Meshkini, 2025. "On the road to urban sustainability: identifying major barriers to urban sustainability in Iran," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(2), pages 351-376, June.
    16. Przemysław Śleszyński & Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Maciej Nowak & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Mohammad Hajian Hossein Abadi & Noura Al Nasiri, 2023. "COVID-19 Spatial Policy: A Comparative Review of Urban Policies in the European Union and the Middle East," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    17. Cui, Pengfei & Abdel-Aty, Mohamed & Wang, Chenzhu & Yang, Xiaobao & Song, Dongdong, 2025. "Examining the impact of spatial inequality in socio-demographic and commute patterns on traffic crash rates: Insights from interpretable machine learning and spatial statistical models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 222-245.
    18. Riepl, Tobias & Schaffartzik, Anke & Grabow, Simon & Banabak, Selim, 2025. "Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. João Monteiro & Nuno Sousa & João Coutinho-Rodrigues & Eduardo Natividade-Jesus, 2024. "Challenges Ahead for Sustainable Cities: An Urban Form and Transport System Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Liu, Dong & Wei, Jiaomin & Kan, Zihan, 2025. "Integrated transit service status assessment using smart transit card big data under the x-minute city framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5748-:d:1684980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.