IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5748-d1684980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • Bander Fahad Alkrides

    (Riyadh Region Municipality, P.O. Box 2770, Riyadh 11146, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tracy Washington

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Mark Limb

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Debra Cushing

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

Abstract

Urban sustainability is closely linked to walkability, as it impacts social interaction, public health, and economic development. In megacities like Riyadh, where automobiles dominate mobility, the development of pedestrian infrastructure remains inadequate. An online survey was conducted through public sampling to evaluate walking conditions in central Riyadh’s commercial districts. The 302 participants evaluated 49 critical walkability indicators to determine their significance and satisfaction with the current conditions. Gap analysis and a displeasure measurement framework identified pedestrian challenges. Participants acknowledged the importance of walkability aspects but expressed strong dissatisfaction with existing conditions. Key barriers to pedestrian comfort included inadequate facilities, environmental discomfort, weak safety measures, and cultural driving preferences. The study highlighted crucial walkability issues requiring improvement, such as public toilets, shaded pathways, air quality, and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure. The findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions in Riyadh’s commercial districts to enhance pedestrian accessibility and comfort, to promote urban sustainability through improved walkability. This study offers a methodological advancement by combining Relative Importance Index, gap analysis, and a novel disgruntlement measurement framework to assess walkability. The use of 49 Delphi-derived indicators contextualized within a GCC megacity adds a unique perspective to urban sustainability research. The findings inform both local policy and global urban studies by demonstrating how culturally and climatically adaptive walkability metrics can guide equitable, data-driven interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bander Fahad Alkrides & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb & Debra Cushing, 2025. "Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5748-:d:1684980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bander Fahad Alkrides, 2025. "Promoting Sustainable Urban Walkability: A Modified Delphi Study on Key Indicators for Urban Walkability in Gulf Cooperation Council Urban Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.
    3. Mohammed Aloshan & Moustafa Gharieb & Khaled Mahmoud Heba & Ragab Khalil & Mohammed Humaid Alhumaid & Mohamed Salah Ezz, 2024. "Promoting Urban Corridors in Saudi City Center to Enhance Walkability Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Eun Jung Kim & Jiyeong Kim & Hyunjung Kim, 2020. "Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation: A Correlation Study in Leisure and Shopping Purposes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Majd Homoud & Ola M. Jarrar, 2024. "Walkability in Riyadh: A Comprehensive Assessment and Implications for Sustainable Community—Al-Falah Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Daniela D’Alessandro & Andrea Rebecchi & Letizia Appolloni & Andrea Brambilla & Silvio Brusaferro & Maddalena Buffoli & Maurizio Carta & Alessandra Casuccio & Liliana Coppola & Maria Vittoria Corazza , 2023. "Re-Thinking the Environment, Cities, and Living Spaces for Public Health Purposes, According with the COVID-19 Lesson: The LVII Erice Charter," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Beatrice Maria Bellè & Alessandro Deserti, 2024. "Urban Greening Plans: A Potential Device towards a Sustainable and Co-Produced Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    5. Xu Lu & Mengqin Zhu & Zeting Li & Qingyu Li & Shan Huang, 2025. "Urban Renewal Strategy Guided by Rail Transit Development Based on the “Node–Place–Revenue” Model: Case Study of Shenyang Metro Line 1," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Benassai-Dalmau, Robert & Borge-Holthoefer, Javier & Solé-Ribalta, Albert, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian permeability in urban sidewalk networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    8. Patrícia C. Melo, 2022. "Will COVID‐19 hinder or aid the transition to sustainable urban mobility? Spotlight on Portugal's largest urban agglomeration," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S1), pages 80-106, November.
    9. Hadi Alizadeh & Abolfazl Meshkini, 2025. "On the road to urban sustainability: identifying major barriers to urban sustainability in Iran," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(2), pages 351-376, June.
    10. Przemysław Śleszyński & Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Maciej Nowak & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Mohammad Hajian Hossein Abadi & Noura Al Nasiri, 2023. "COVID-19 Spatial Policy: A Comparative Review of Urban Policies in the European Union and the Middle East," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Cui, Pengfei & Abdel-Aty, Mohamed & Wang, Chenzhu & Yang, Xiaobao & Song, Dongdong, 2025. "Examining the impact of spatial inequality in socio-demographic and commute patterns on traffic crash rates: Insights from interpretable machine learning and spatial statistical models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 222-245.
    12. Riepl, Tobias & Schaffartzik, Anke & Grabow, Simon & Banabak, Selim, 2025. "Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Md Faisal Kabir & Mahnoor Fatima Sohail & Caroline Hachem-Vermette, 2025. "Adapting the 15-Minute City to North America: A Framework for Neighborhood Clusters with Urban Agriculture and Green Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Zhu, Yalei & Wang, Yuankai & Li, Junxuan & Song, Qiwei & Chen, Da & Qiu, Waishan, 2025. "BikeshareGAN: Predicting dockless bike-sharing demand based on satellite image," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Paulina Brożek & Olena Pakhnenko & Tetyana Vasylieva & Serhiy Lyeonov, 2022. "Resilience of Smart Cities to the Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Jules Pretty & Dennis Garrity & Hemant Kumar Badola & Mike Barrett & Cornelia Butler Flora & Catherine Cameron & Natasha Grist & Leanne Hepburn & Heather Hilburn & Amy Isham & Erik Jacobi & Rattan Lal, 2025. "How the Concept of “Regenerative Good Growth” Could Help Increase Public and Policy Engagement and Speed Transitions to Net Zero and Nature Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Kwon, Kihyun, 2025. "Investigating the characteristics of public electric vehicle charging station: A case study of California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 101-107.
    18. Bruno Trapanese & Ilaria Mariotti, 2022. "Socio-Cultural Hybrid Spaces in Milan Coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 39-59, DECEMBER.
    19. Sigit D. Arifwidodo & Orana Chandrasiri & Putthipanya Rueangsom, 2025. "Is Proximity to Parks Associated with Physical Activity and Well-Being? Insights from 15-Minute Parks Policy Initiative in Bangkok, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Rui Colaço & Gracielle Gonçalves Ferreira de Araújo & João de Abreu e Silva, 2025. "The Role of Walkability in Shaping Shopping and Delivery Services: Insights into E-Consumer Behavior," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5748-:d:1684980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.