IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1061-d1435889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in Peri-Urban Landscapes: Drivers, Governance Obstacles and Improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Spyra

    (Department of Sustainable Landscape Development, Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
    Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Opole University of Technology, Katowicka 48, 46-020 Opole, Poland)

  • Nica Claudia Caló

    (Department of Sustainable Landscape Development, Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, 06120 Halle, Germany)

  • Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur

    (Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, Tierra del Fuego, Ushuaia 9410, Argentina)

  • María Vanessa Lencinas

    (Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, Tierra del Fuego, Ushuaia 9410, Argentina)

  • Daniele La Rosa

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESs) manifest when the enhancement of one service leads to the diminishment of another. These trade-offs pose a notable challenge, impacting the sustainability of particular socioecological system peri-urban landscapes (PULs). This issue arises from the dynamic processes associated with peri-urbanization, which threaten natural ecosystems and their services in peri-urban areas. Additionally, the escalating demand for ecosystem services in PULs contributes to these trade-offs. Policymaking and planning concerning ES trade-offs in PULs should prioritize promoting a balance between conflicting services and fostering synergies among them. However, it is noteworthy that ES trade-offs in PULs are not given high priority in policy and planning agendas. Knowledge regarding policy development and planning for ES trade-offs in PULs often remains concealed within specific country and regional case studies. Consequently, this research seeks to characterize the ES trade-offs in selected PUL case studies, with the objective of identifying potential commonalities among them. Furthermore, this study aims to identify (i) the factors driving ES trade-offs, (ii) challenges related to how policymaking and planning address ES trade-offs in PULs, and (iii) recommendations for enhancing governance practices to better manage peri-urban ES trade-offs. We designed a semi-quantitative survey and collected information about 24 case studies located across the world. The answers from this survey were analyzed using principal component analysis. The results showed that the most common trade-offs occurred between “cultural and provisioning” and “regulating and provisioning” ESs. It was found that urban development is the primary driver behind the emergence of the examined trade-offs. To address this issue at the governance level, this study recommends establishing mechanisms to facilitate collaboration among stakeholders. This should be accompanied by robust dissemination efforts and the promotion of awareness among actors regarding the fundamental concepts of ESs and PULs.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Spyra & Nica Claudia Caló & Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur & María Vanessa Lencinas & Daniele La Rosa, 2024. "Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in Peri-Urban Landscapes: Drivers, Governance Obstacles and Improvements," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1061-:d:1435889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1061-:d:1435889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.