IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p729-d1399881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Chaobo Zhou

    (College of International Economics and Trade, Ningbo University of Finance and Economics, Ningbo 315175, China
    Climate Change and Energy Economics Study Center, Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jingchan Wang

    (College of Journalism and Grammar, Wuchang Shouyi University, Wuhan 430064, China)

  • Zhiwei Wu

    (College of International Economics and Trade, Ningbo University of Finance and Economics, Ningbo 315175, China)

Abstract

China is facing development challenges, such as the red line of arable land, resource shortage, and tightening ecological and environmental constraints. In this context, improving land green utilization efficiency (LGUE) is not only an important undertaking to optimize the spatial layout of the country and improve resource carrying capacity but also an inevitable choice for the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development. China’s energy-consuming right trading (ECRT) is an important energy transition demonstration policy; however, its effect on LGUE has yet to be scientifically evaluated in academic research. Using panel data of 260 prefecture-level cities in China from 2009 to 2021, this study first uses a difference-in-difference model to test the effect of ECRT on LGUE, analyze its transmission mechanism, and further examine the impact of urban characteristic heterogeneity on policy effects from multiple perspectives. Results show the following: (1) The pilot policy of ECRT significantly improves urban LGUE, as confirmed by robustness tests. (2) The ECRT pilot policy enhances urban technological innovation, promotes the upgrading of industrial structure, and thereby improves LGUE. (3) The ECRT has a more significant enhancement effect on the central and western cities, large-scale cities, and resource-based cities. (4) Government environmental protection assessment can have a positive moderating effect, that is, further amplifying the effect of ECRT on improving urban LGUE. In conclusion, we should solidly promote the construction of a unified national ECRT market, formulate policy implementation plans tailored to local conditions, and steadily improve LGUE. To a certain extent, this paper reveals the inherent logic of how ECRT affects LGUE, which provides opportunities for cities to improve LGUE through ECRT, and provides reference for promoting the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaobo Zhou & Jingchan Wang & Zhiwei Wu, 2024. "Impact of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:729-:d:1399881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Weilong & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The impact of energy-consuming rights trading on green total factor productivity in the context of digital economy: Evidence from listed firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Aiping Wang & Weifen Lin & Bei Liu & Hui Wang & Hong Xu, 2021. "Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Yang, Mian & Hou, Yaru & Fang, Chao & Duan, Hongbo, 2020. "Constructing energy-consuming right trading system for China's manufacturing industry in 2025," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Pan, Yuling & Dong, Feng, 2022. "Design of energy use rights trading policy from the perspective of energy vulnerability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Wang, Kaike & Su, Xuewei & Wang, Shuhong, 2023. "How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Olivier Deschênes & Michael Greenstone & Joseph S. Shapiro, 2017. "Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(10), pages 2958-2989, October.
    7. Yuan Wang & Anlu Zhang & Min Min & Ke Zhao & Weiyan Hu & Fude Qin, 2023. "Research on the Effect of Manufacturing Agglomeration on Green Use Efficiency of Industrial Land," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Ning & Mengqiu Wang & Ning Wang & Yu Sun & Haozhi Ma, 2025. "Assessment, Evolutionary Trends, and Convergence of Land Green Utilization Efficiency in Three Northeastern Provinces of China Undergoing Population Shrinkage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Xinyue Wang & Kegao Yan & Yang Shi & Han Hu & Shanjun Mao, 2025. "The Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Pressure on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency—Empirical Research from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Yifei Wang & Sijia Li, 2025. "Green Fiscal Policy and Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Zhen & Ding, Chante Jian & Zhao, Kunqian, 2025. "Energy use rights trading and carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    2. Zheng, Qingying & Hu, Haoyang & Li, Jianglong, 2024. "Enterprise decision-making in energy use rights trading market: A theoretical and simulation study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Li, Xingwei & Yang, Jie & Yao, Yuhong & Ding, Zuoyi & Hao, Jiekuo & Yin, Wenjun & Shen, Qiong, 2024. "Boosting green technology innovation in China's construction industry: The power of energy-consuming rights trading policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 410-423.
    4. Zhang, Weijie & Yu, Yanni & Liu, Qingjun, 2024. "Is single or synergistic environmental permit trading system more effective? A study based on Chinese industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Wu, Xueping & Qiu, Wenhai, 2024. "Carbon decoupling effects of energy consumption permit trading schemes: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Zhang, Yanfang & Gao, Qi & Wei, Jinpeng & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Can China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme achieve the “Porter” effect? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Xinyu Yang & Siqi Yu & Xinling Jiang & Zhongyao Cai & Ping Jiang, 2025. "The Impact of Different Types of Energy Transition Policies in China on Household Energy Poverty and Health Vulnerability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Zhang, Yanfang & Wei, Jinpeng & Gao, Qi & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Coordination between the energy-consumption permit trading scheme and carbon emissions trading: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Qiuyan Yan & Kai Wan, 2024. "Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy and Corporate ESG Performance: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Li, Ge & Wang, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Energy quota trading policy and energy efficiency: The role of government supervision and public participation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Wang, Juan & Li, Ziming & Wang, Yanan, 2024. "How does China's energy-consumption trading policy affect the carbon abatement costs? An analysis based on spatial difference-in-differences method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    12. Wang, Kaike & Yin, Ru & He, Qiang & Wang, Shuhong, 2024. "Transfer payments and carbon reduction in China: The effect of the national comprehensive demonstration city of energy saving and emission reduction fiscal policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    13. Bingnan Guo & Peiji Hu, 2024. "Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3248-3270, August.
    14. Liu, Li & Sheng, Jichuan, 2024. "Energy quota trading and energy vulnerability: China's energy quota trading pilot," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Alexander C. Abajian & Tamma Carleton & Kyle C. Meng & Olivier Deschênes, 2025. "Quantifying the global climate feedback from energy-based adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Stephen Jarvis & Olivier Deschenes & Akshaya Jha, 2022. "The Private and External Costs of Germany’s Nuclear Phase-Out," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(3), pages 1311-1346.
    17. Ju, Heng & Tang, Yao & Zhang, Meilan, 2024. "Air Pollution's Grip: Drug Cost and Its Heterogeneity in China," MPRA Paper 121154, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Brown, David P. & Muehlenbachs, Lucija, 2024. "The value of electricity reliability: Evidence from battery adoption," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Aline Bütikofer & Deirdre Coy & Orla Doyle & Rita Ginja, 2024. "The Consequences of Miscarriage on Parental Investments," CESifo Working Paper Series 11003, CESifo.
    20. Liu, Haoming & Salvo, Alberto, 2017. "Severe Air Pollution and School Absences: Longitudinal Data on Expatriates in North China," IZA Discussion Papers 11134, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:729-:d:1399881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.