IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1144-d1159007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial and Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessments: Implications for Spatial Planning Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Kimmo Lylykangas

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
    Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland)

  • Rebecca Cachia

    (Dublin’s Energy Agency CODEMA, D02 TK74 Dublin 2, Ireland)

  • Damiano Cerrone

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
    School of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland)

  • Kaie Kriiska

    (Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, 10416 Tallinn, Estonia
    AS SEB Pank, 15010 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Ulrich Norbisrath

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
    Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Peter R. Walke

    (Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, 10416 Tallinn, Estonia
    Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, Department of Materials and Environmental Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Anssi Joutsiniemi

    (Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, 00076 Espoo, Finland)

  • Jukka Heinonen

    (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland)

Abstract

The quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is increasingly important in spatial planning for regions, cities, and areas. The combination of territorial and consumption-based accounting (CBA) approaches can currently be considered best practice for calculating GHG emissions at sub-national levels, in terms of informing local decision-making about the different climate impacts of spatial planning policies, both within the boundaries of a given region and for the inhabitants of that region. This study introduces four European case studies that were conducted using the two quantification approaches to assess the climate impacts of locally relevant planning policies. The case studies represent different scales of spatial planning, different European planning systems, and different situations in terms of data availability. Territorial results are not suitable for inter-regional comparison, but rather for internal monitoring, while CBA allows for comparison and provides a comprehensive picture of the global carbon footprint of residents, however, with indications that are more difficult to link to spatial planning decisions. Assessing impacts, and in particular interpreting results, requires both methodological understanding and knowledge of the local context. The results of the case studies show that setting climate targets and monitoring the success of climate action through a single net emissions figure can give false indications. The study shows that the two approaches to quantifying GHG emissions provide complementary perspectives on GHG emissions at the sub-national level and thus provide a more thorough understanding of the GHG emission patterns associated with spatial planning policies. The identification of the regional differences in GHG emission sources and mitigation potentials are the main functions of sub-national GHG inventories and the impact assessment for spatial planning. Harmonization of the data collection for sub-national GHG inventories and the transparency of underlying assumptions would greatly support the coherence of climate action and the implications to spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimmo Lylykangas & Rebecca Cachia & Damiano Cerrone & Kaie Kriiska & Ulrich Norbisrath & Peter R. Walke & Anssi Joutsiniemi & Jukka Heinonen, 2023. "Territorial and Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessments: Implications for Spatial Planning Policies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1144-:d:1159007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Watts, 2017. "Cities spearhead climate action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 537-538, August.
    2. Clara Lenk & Rosalie Arendt & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Territorial-Based vs. Consumption-Based Carbon Footprint of an Urban District—A Case Study of Berlin-Wedding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Bunsen & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "An Introductory Review of Input-Output Analysis in Sustainability Sciences Including Potential Implications of Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Liang Liu & Lianshui Li, 2021. "The effect of directed technical change on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from China’s industrial sector at the provincial level," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2463-2486, July.
    3. Thomas Wiedmann & Guangwu Chen & Anne Owen & Manfred Lenzen & Michael Doust & John Barrett & Kristian Steele, 2021. "Three‐scope carbon emission inventories of global cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 735-750, June.
    4. Jacksohn, Anke & Tovar Reaños, Miguel Angel & Pothen, Frank & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2023. "Trends in household demand and greenhouse gas footprints in Germany: Evidence from microdata of the last 20 years," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Michele Acuto & Benjamin Leffel, 2021. "Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1758-1774, July.
    6. Cai, Bofeng & Liu, Helin & Zhang, Xiaoling & Pan, Haozhi & Zhao, Mengxue & Zheng, Tianming & Nie, Jingxin & Du, Mengbing & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2022. "High-resolution accounting of urban emissions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    7. Shuang Zhou & Chaobo Zhou, 2021. "Evaluation of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy: Evidence from 210 prefecture-level cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & Arild Angelsen & Andrea Baranzini & W.J. Wouter Botzen & Stefano Carattini & Stefan Drews & Tessa Dunlop & Eric Galbraith & Elisabeth Gsottbauer & Richard B. Howarth & Em, 2018. "Parallel tracks towards a global treaty on carbon pricing," Working Papers 2018/12, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    9. Gronen, Maria Elisabeth & Sudermann, Yannick, 2023. "Towards a seat at the table: How an initiative of cities got their voices heard during Germany's 2022 G7 presidency," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Shili Yang & Changxin Liu & Wenjie Dong & Jieming Chou & Di Tian & Ting Wei & Yuan Tian, 2018. "Quantifying the Climate Impact of the US Policy Choices Using an Economic and Earth System Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Liz Wachs & Shweta Singh, 2020. "Projecting the urban energy demand for Indiana, USA, in 2050 and 2080," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 1949-1966, December.
    12. Lukas Hermwille, 2018. "Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 447-466, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1144-:d:1159007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.