IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i3p584-d1083751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Change Net Removals Associated with Sugarcane in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Marjorie M. Guarenghi

    (Agroicone, Avenida Angélica, 2447 Higienópolis, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil)

  • Danilo F. T. Garofalo

    (Agroicone, Avenida Angélica, 2447 Higienópolis, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil)

  • Joaquim E. A. Seabra

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, 200 Mendeleyev, Campinas 13083-860, Brazil)

  • Marcelo M. R. Moreira

    (Agroicone, Avenida Angélica, 2447 Higienópolis, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil)

  • Renan M. L. Novaes

    (Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Rodovia SP-340, Km 127.5, Jaguariuna 13918-110, Brazil)

  • Nilza Patrícia Ramos

    (Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Rodovia SP-340, Km 127.5, Jaguariuna 13918-110, Brazil)

  • Sandra F. Nogueira

    (Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Rodovia SP-340, Km 127.5, Jaguariuna 13918-110, Brazil)

  • Cristiano A. de Andrade

    (Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Rodovia SP-340, Km 127.5, Jaguariuna 13918-110, Brazil)

Abstract

This work brings a refined estimation of the land use change and derived CO 2 emissions associated with sugarcane cultivation, including changes in management practices and refined land-use carbon stocks, over the last two decades for Brazil’s center–south and north regions. The analysis was carried out at the rural property level, considering spatially explicit land conversion data. With the refinements, we found a net carbon removal of 9.8 TgCO 2 ∙yr −1 in sugarcane cultivation areas in the 2000–2020 period, which was due to the expansion of sugarcane over poor quality pastures (55% of the gross removals), croplands (15%) and mosaic (14%) areas, and the transition from the conventional burned harvesting to unburned (16%). Moreover, 98.4% of expansion was over existent agricultural areas. Considering all the land use changes within sugarcane-producing rural properties, the net removal is even larger, of 17 TgCO 2 ∙yr −1 , which is due to vegetation recovery. This suggests that public policies and private control mechanisms might have been effective not only to control deforestation but also to induce carbon removals associated with sugarcane cultivation. These results indicate sugarcane production system and derived products as contributors to net carbon removals in the land sector in Brazil and should be considered for both bioenergy and agricultural sustainability evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjorie M. Guarenghi & Danilo F. T. Garofalo & Joaquim E. A. Seabra & Marcelo M. R. Moreira & Renan M. L. Novaes & Nilza Patrícia Ramos & Sandra F. Nogueira & Cristiano A. de Andrade, 2023. "Land Use Change Net Removals Associated with Sugarcane in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:584-:d:1083751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sparovek, Gerd & Reydon, Bastiaan Philip & Guedes Pinto, Luís Fernando & Faria, Vinicius & de Freitas, Flavio Luiz Mazzaro & Azevedo-Ramos, Claudia & Gardner, Toby & Hamamura, Caio & Rajão, Raoni & Ce, 2019. "Who owns Brazilian lands?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Marcos Adami & Bernardo Friedrich Theodor Rudorff & Ramon Morais Freitas & Daniel Alves Aguiar & Luciana Miura Sugawara & Marcio Pupin Mello, 2012. "Remote Sensing Time Series to Evaluate Direct Land Use Change of Recent Expanded Sugarcane Crop in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. de Andrade Junior, Milton Aurelio Uba & Valin, Hugo & Soterroni, Aline C. & Ramos, Fernando M. & Halog, Anthony, 2019. "Exploring future scenarios of ethanol demand in Brazil and their land-use implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoping Li & Sai Hu & Lifu Jiang & Bing Han & Jie Li & Xuan Wei, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and the Development Path of Land-Use Carbon Emissions from a Low-Carbon Perspective: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercure, J.-F. & Paim, M.A. & Bocquillon, P. & Lindner, S. & Salas, P. & Martinelli, P. & Berchin, I.I. & de Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O & Derani, C. & de Albuquerque Junior, C.L. & Ribeiro, J.M.P. & Knob, 2019. "System complexity and policy integration challenges: The Brazilian Energy- Water-Food Nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 230-243.
    2. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zhengjun Wan & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Marc A. Rosen, 2018. "Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Almut Schilling-Vacaflor, 2021. "Integrating Human Rights and the Environment in Supply Chain Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Conceição, Katyanne V. & Chaves, Michel E.D. & Picoli, Michelle C.A. & Sánchez, Alber H. & Soares, Anderson R. & Mataveli, Guilherme A.V. & Silva, Daniel E. & Costa, Joelma S. & Camara, Gilberto, 2021. "Government policies endanger the indigenous peoples of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Maurício Roberto Cherubin & João Luís Nunes Carvalho & Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri & Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira & Glaucia Mendes Souza & Heitor Cantarella, 2021. "Land Use and Management Effects on Sustainable Sugarcane-Derived Bioenergy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Bernardo F. T. Rudorff & Marcos Adami & Joel Risso & Daniel Alves De Aguiar & Bernardo Pires & Daniel Amaral & Leandro Fabiani & Izabel Cecarelli, 2012. "Remote Sensing Images to Detect Soy Plantations in the Amazon Biome—The Soy Moratorium Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Lin Zhang & Zhe Liu & Diyou Liu & Quan Xiong & Ning Yang & Tianwei Ren & Chao Zhang & Xiaodong Zhang & Shaoming Li, 2019. "Crop Mapping Based on Historical Samples and New Training Samples Generation in Heilongjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Keles, Derya & Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Nazindigouba Kéré, Eric, 2018. "Does the expansion of biofuels encroach on the forest?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 75-82.
    9. Anjinho, Phelipe da Silva & Barbosa, Mariana Abibi Guimarães Araujo & Costa, Carlos Wilmer & Mauad, Frederico Fábio, 2021. "Environmental fragility analysis in reservoir drainage basin land use planning: A Brazilian basin case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Benzeev, Rayna & Wiens, Ashton & Piotto, Daniel & Newton, Peter, 2023. "Property size and forest cover were key determinants of forest restoration in Southern Bahia in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Nilsa Duarte da Silva Lima & Irenilza de Alencar Nääs & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Raquel Baracat Tosi Rodrigues da Silva, 2020. "Classifying the Level of Energy-Environmental Efficiency Rating of Brazilian Ethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Quanlong Feng & Jianhua Gong & Jiantao Liu & Yi Li, 2015. "Monitoring Cropland Dynamics of the Yellow River Delta based on Multi-Temporal Landsat Imagery over 1986 to 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Bastiaan Reydon & Gabriel Pansani Siqueira & Delaide Silva Passos & Stephan Honer, 2022. "Unclear Land Rights and Deforestation: Pieces of Evidence from Brazilian Reality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Porro, Roberto & Porro, Noemi Sakiara Miyasaka, 2022. "State-led social and environmental policy failure in a Brazilian forest frontier: Sustainable Development Project in Anapu, Pará," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Fabio G. Santeramo & Monica Delsignore & Enrica Imbert & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2023. "The Future of the EU Bioenergy Sector: Economic, Environmental, Social, and Legislative Challenges," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 17(1), pages 1-1–52, April.
    16. Mathews, Mason Clay, 2021. "How village leaders in rural Amazonia create bonding, bridging, and linking social capital configurations to achieve development goals, and why they are so difficult to maintain over time," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Delaroche, Martin & Le Tourneau, François-Michel & Daugeard, Marion, 2022. "How vegetation classification and mapping may influence conservation: The example of Brazil’s Native Vegetation Protection Law," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. Reydon, Bastiaan Philip & Fernandes, Vitor Bukvar & Telles, Tiago Santos, 2020. "Land governance as a precondition for decreasing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. A.S. Duden & P.A. Verweij & A.P.C. Faaij & D. Baisero & C. Rondinini & F. van der Hilst, 2020. "Biodiversity Impacts of Increased Ethanol Production in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Chao Wang & Xi Chu & Jinyan Zhan & Pei Wang & Fan Zhang & Zhongling Xin, 2019. "Factors Contributing to Efficient Forest Production in the Region of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:584-:d:1083751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.