IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p141-d1021940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Transition and Its Ecosystem Resilience Response in China during 1990–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Liuwen Liao

    (College of Economics and Management, Changsha University, Changsha 410022, China)

  • Enpu Ma

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Hualou Long

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xiaojun Peng

    (College of Geography and Tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China)

Abstract

Land use transition and its eco-environmental effects are important research topics. Its essence is the process that human activities exert interference to the ecological environment in the process of social and economic development, and the ecosystem resists interference and recovers and adapts to interference. The article starts from the transition of land use dominant morphology and takes ecological resilience as the breakthrough point. Based on four periods of land use data, this article studied the spatio-temporal evolution of land use and ecological resilience and the response of ecological resilience to land use transition in China from 1990 to 2020. The results showed as follows: (1) During the study period, the construction land in China continued to increase, and the forest land, grassland, and farmland showed a fluctuating trend. (2) The spatial distribution pattern of ecological resilience showed the characteristics of “high in the southeast and low in the northwest”. The mean value and total value of ecological resilience in the region decreased first and then increased, taking 2010 as the dividing line. The difference in ecological resilience increased first and then decreased. (3) Ecological land and construction land are the main types of land that affect the changes in ecological resilience. The higher the proportion of ecological lands such as forest land, grassland, and waters, the smaller the variable coefficient of ecological resilience. The higher the proportion of construction land, the greater the difference in ecosystem elasticity among different types of areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Liuwen Liao & Enpu Ma & Hualou Long & Xiaojun Peng, 2022. "Land Use Transition and Its Ecosystem Resilience Response in China during 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:141-:d:1021940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Wenfang Pu & Anlu Zhang & Lanjiao Wen, 2021. "Can China’s Resource-Saving and Environmentally Friendly Society Really Improve the Efficiency of Industrial Land Use?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Jian Tian & Suiping Zeng & Jian Zeng & Sen Wang, 2022. "How Urban Expansion Triggers Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Systemic Risk in Suburban Rural Areas: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Zhenhua Dong & Ah Rong & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Aru Han & Feng Zhi, 2022. "Study on the Evolutionary Features and Driving Factors of Land-Use System in Xilingol, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Xinqing Wang & Tao Pan & Ruoyi Pan & Wenfeng Chi & Chen Ma & Letian Ning & Xiaoyu Wang & Jiacheng Zhang, 2022. "Impact of Land Transition on Landscape and Ecosystem Service Value in Northeast Region of China from 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Cao, Jianjun & Li, Mengtian & Deo, Ravinesh C. & Adamowski, Jan F. & Cerdà, Artemi & Feng, Qi & Liu, Minxia & Zhang, Jian & Zhu, Guofeng & Zhang, Xuebin & Xu, Xueyun & Yang, Shurong & Gong, Yifan, 2018. "Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 88-96.
    7. Janssen, Marco A. & Anderies, John M. & Walker, Brian H., 2004. "Robust strategies for managing rangelands with multiple stable attractors," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 140-162, January.
    8. Hualou Long & Xiangbin Kong & Shougeng Hu & Yurui Li, 2021. "Land Use Transitions under Rapid Urbanization: A Perspective from Developing China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-9, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanru Yang & Enpu Ma & Liuwen Liao & Man Wu, 2024. "Land Use Change in a Typical Transect in Northern China and Its Impact on the Ecological Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Yibo Xu & Xiaohuang Liu & Lianrong Zhao & Hongyu Li & Ping Zhu & Run Liu & Chao Wang & Bo Wang, 2025. "Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Basin Based on Land-Use Transition and Its Driving Forces," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
    2. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin F., 2009. "Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2008-2020, May.
    3. Pingxing Li & Chonggang Liu & Hui Cao, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Stress Caused by Land Use Transitions Considering the Location of Incremental Construction Lands: The Case of Southern Jiangsu in Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Yanan Liu & Wei Zou & Kening Wu & Xiao Li & Xiaoliang Li & Rui Zhao, 2025. "The Implementation Path for a Policy Balancing Cultivated Land Occupation and Reclamation Based on Land-Type Classification—A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Xinhai Lu & Zhenxing Shi & Jia Li & Junhao Dong & Mingjie Song & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Factor Flow on Urban Land Use Efficiency from the Perspective of Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Kobayashi, Mimako & Harris, Thomas R. & Rollins, Kimberly S., 2009. "Invasive Weeds, Wildfire, and Rancher Decision Making in the Great Basin," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49365, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Domptail, Stéphanie & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2010. "The role of uncertainty and expectations in modeling (range)land use strategies: An application of dynamic optimization modeling with recursion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2475-2485, October.
    9. Ping Wang & Zhibao Wang, 2024. "New Interpretation of Human–Land Relations: Evidence from the Impact of Population Aging on Resource Utilization Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. B Kelsey Jack & Carolyn Kousky & Katharine R E Sims, 2007. "Lessons Relearned: Can Previous Research on Incentive-Based Mechanisms Point the Way for Payments for Ecosystem Services?," CID Working Papers 15, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    11. Polasky, Stephen & de Zeeuw, Aart & Wagener, Florian, 2011. "Optimal management with potential regime shifts," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 229-240, September.
    12. Börner, Jan & Higgins, Steven I. & Scheiter, Simon & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2013. "Approximating Optimal Numerical Solutions to Bio-economic Systems: How Useful is Simulation-optimization?," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 52(3), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Johannus Janmaat, 2012. "Fishing in a Shallow Lake: Exploring a Classic Fishery Model in a Habitat with Shallow Lake Dynamics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 215-239, February.
    14. Engler, John-Oliver & von Wehrden, Henrik & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2019. "Determinants of farm size and stocking rate in Namibian commercial cattle farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 232-246.
    15. Yan Yu & Ya Wu & Pan Wang & Yili Zhang & Liang Emlyn Yang & Xian Cheng & Jianzhong Yan, 2021. "Grassland Subsidies Increase the Number of Livestock on the Tibetan Plateau: Why Does the “Payment for Ecosystem Services” Policy Have the Opposite Outcome?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Nannen, Volker & van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M., 2008. "Evolutionary Analysis of Climate Policy and Renewable Energy: Heterogeneous Agents, Relative Welfare and Social Network," MPRA Paper 25881, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lingling Hou & Pengfei Liu & Xiaohui Tian, 2023. "Grassland tenure reform and grassland quality in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1388-1404, October.
    18. Wei Jiang & Ke-Liang Wang & Zhuang Miao, 2024. "How does internet development affect urban eco-resilience: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-40, April.
    19. Xinyu Shi & Xiaoqing Zhao & Pei Huang & Zexian Gu & Junwei Pu & Shijie Zhou & Guoxun Qu & Qiaoqiao Zhao & Yan Feng & Yanjun Chen & Aimeng Xiang, 2023. "Rural Development under Poverty Governance: The Relationship between Rural Income and Land Use Transformation in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Albert Sanghoon Park, 2024. "Understanding resilience in sustainable development: Rallying call or siren song?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 260-274, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:141-:d:1021940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.